Snarky

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

Snarky

#1 Post by peacock2121 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:19 am

rudely sarcastic

snide

Sounds like someone I know.

User avatar
christie1111
11:11
Posts: 11630
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:54 am
Location: CT

#2 Post by christie1111 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:20 am

Sounds like a lot of people we know!

:P
"A bed without a quilt is like the sky without stars"

User avatar
Rexer25
It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
Posts: 2899
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Just this side of nowhere

Re: Snarky

#3 Post by Rexer25 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:21 am

peacock2121 wrote:rudely sarcastic

snide

Sounds like someone I know.
Sounds like a bored I know...
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!

That'll be $10, please.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

Re: Snarky

#4 Post by peacock2121 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:23 am

Rexer25 wrote:
peacock2121 wrote:rudely sarcastic

snide

Sounds like someone I know.
Sounds like a bored I know...
LOL - sounds like BobJuch to me.

I would not even put that on HoltDad - he doesn't do the sarcastic thing much or well.

User avatar
littlebeast13
Dumbass
Posts: 31538
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
Contact:

#5 Post by littlebeast13 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:23 am

Three cheers for snarkyness!!!!!

lb13

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7634
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

#6 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:27 am

littlebeast13 wrote:Three cheers for snarkyness!!!!!

lb13
Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:
 That alone should encourage the crew.
Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
 What I tell you three times is true.”
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
andrewjackson
Posts: 3945
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
Location: Planet 10

#7 Post by andrewjackson » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:33 am

Interesting. Much older usage than I realized and it comes from to find fault with or nag.

From the OED:
snark, v.

dial.

[Corresponds to MLG. and LG. snarken (NFris. snarke, Sw. and Norw. snarka), MHG. snarchen (G. schnarchen, {dag}schnarken), of imitative origin: cf. SNORK v.]

1. intr. To snore; to snort.
1866 N. & Q. 3rd Ser. X. 248/1, I will not quite compare it [a sound] to a certain kind of snarking or gnashing. 1907 Westm. Gaz. 9 Nov. 4/1 All of a sudden she (the mare, I suppose he meant) snarked an' begun to turn round.

2. intr. and trans. To find fault (with), to nag.
1882 Jamieson's Sc. Dict. IV. 314/2 To Snark,..to fret, grumble, or find fault with one. 1904 E. NESBIT Ph{oe}nix & Carpet x. 185 He remembered how Anthea had refrained from snarking him about tearing the carpet.
and
snarky, a.
colloq.


[f. SNARK v. + -Y1.]

Irritable, short-tempered, ‘narky’.
1906 E. NESBIT Railway Children ii. 49 Don't be snarky, Peter. It isn't our fault. 1913 J. VAIZEY College Girl xxiv. 326 ‘Why should you think I am “snarky”?’ ‘Because{em}you are! You're not a bit sociable and friendly.’ 1953 E. COXHEAD Midlanders x. 247 I've known you were the soul of kindness, under that snarky way. a1974 R. CROSSMAN Diaries (1976) II. 627 We also have to overcome something else{em}the stream of anti-government propaganda, smearing, snarky, derisive, which comes out of Fleet Street.

Hence {sm}snarkily adv.; {sm}snarkiness; {sm}snarkish a.
1912 R. FRY Let. 16 Mar. (1972) I. 355 So sorry I seem so snarkish just now. 1960 Economist 28 May 859/2 In some of his comments on bureaucracy there is a relapse into snarkiness. 1967 Listener 20 July 91/3 Viewers' letters are not just read out. They are commented upon by Kenneth Robinson (usually rather snarkily).
No matter where you go, there you are.

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 22106
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

#8 Post by Bob78164 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:39 pm

I think that Nate Silver has it exactly right. This was a speech that was designed to, and did, fire up the base. The problem is that it almost certainly fired up both bases, and in 2008, the Democratic base is bigger than the Republican base.

If the bases turn out equally, all Obama needs to do is split the independent vote, and he wins. And after that sarcastic, mean-spirited, mocking speech, I don't see how McCain can hope to do any better than a split. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
andrewjackson
Posts: 3945
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
Location: Planet 10

#9 Post by andrewjackson » Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:07 pm

Bob78164 wrote:I think that Nate Silver has it exactly right. This was a speech that was designed to, and did, fire up the base. The problem is that it almost certainly fired up both bases, and in 2008, the Democratic base is bigger than the Republican base.

If the bases turn out equally, all Obama needs to do is split the independent vote, and he wins. And after that sarcastic, mean-spirited, mocking speech, I don't see how McCain can hope to do any better than a split. --Bob
I thought this was a non-political thread.
No matter where you go, there you are.

Post Reply