Snarky
- peacock2121
- Posts: 18451
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am
Snarky
rudely sarcastic
snide
Sounds like someone I know.
snide
Sounds like someone I know.
- christie1111
- 11:11
- Posts: 11630
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:54 am
- Location: CT
- Rexer25
- It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
- Posts: 2899
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: Just this side of nowhere
Re: Snarky
Sounds like a bored I know...peacock2121 wrote:rudely sarcastic
snide
Sounds like someone I know.
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!
That'll be $10, please.
That'll be $10, please.
- peacock2121
- Posts: 18451
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am
Re: Snarky
LOL - sounds like BobJuch to me.Rexer25 wrote:Sounds like a bored I know...peacock2121 wrote:rudely sarcastic
snide
Sounds like someone I know.
I would not even put that on HoltDad - he doesn't do the sarcastic thing much or well.
- littlebeast13
- Dumbass
- Posts: 31538
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
- Contact:
- themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7634
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:littlebeast13 wrote:Three cheers for snarkyness!!!!!
lb13
That alone should encourage the crew.
Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
What I tell you three times is true.”
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
- andrewjackson
- Posts: 3945
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
- Location: Planet 10
Interesting. Much older usage than I realized and it comes from to find fault with or nag.
From the OED:
From the OED:
andsnark, v.
dial.
[Corresponds to MLG. and LG. snarken (NFris. snarke, Sw. and Norw. snarka), MHG. snarchen (G. schnarchen, {dag}schnarken), of imitative origin: cf. SNORK v.]
1. intr. To snore; to snort.
1866 N. & Q. 3rd Ser. X. 248/1, I will not quite compare it [a sound] to a certain kind of snarking or gnashing. 1907 Westm. Gaz. 9 Nov. 4/1 All of a sudden she (the mare, I suppose he meant) snarked an' begun to turn round.
2. intr. and trans. To find fault (with), to nag.
1882 Jamieson's Sc. Dict. IV. 314/2 To Snark,..to fret, grumble, or find fault with one. 1904 E. NESBIT Ph{oe}nix & Carpet x. 185 He remembered how Anthea had refrained from snarking him about tearing the carpet.
snarky, a.
colloq.
[f. SNARK v. + -Y1.]
Irritable, short-tempered, ‘narky’.
1906 E. NESBIT Railway Children ii. 49 Don't be snarky, Peter. It isn't our fault. 1913 J. VAIZEY College Girl xxiv. 326 ‘Why should you think I am “snarky”?’ ‘Because{em}you are! You're not a bit sociable and friendly.’ 1953 E. COXHEAD Midlanders x. 247 I've known you were the soul of kindness, under that snarky way. a1974 R. CROSSMAN Diaries (1976) II. 627 We also have to overcome something else{em}the stream of anti-government propaganda, smearing, snarky, derisive, which comes out of Fleet Street.
Hence {sm}snarkily adv.; {sm}snarkiness; {sm}snarkish a.
1912 R. FRY Let. 16 Mar. (1972) I. 355 So sorry I seem so snarkish just now. 1960 Economist 28 May 859/2 In some of his comments on bureaucracy there is a relapse into snarkiness. 1967 Listener 20 July 91/3 Viewers' letters are not just read out. They are commented upon by Kenneth Robinson (usually rather snarkily).
No matter where you go, there you are.
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22106
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
I think that Nate Silver has it exactly right. This was a speech that was designed to, and did, fire up the base. The problem is that it almost certainly fired up both bases, and in 2008, the Democratic base is bigger than the Republican base.
If the bases turn out equally, all Obama needs to do is split the independent vote, and he wins. And after that sarcastic, mean-spirited, mocking speech, I don't see how McCain can hope to do any better than a split. --Bob
If the bases turn out equally, all Obama needs to do is split the independent vote, and he wins. And after that sarcastic, mean-spirited, mocking speech, I don't see how McCain can hope to do any better than a split. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- andrewjackson
- Posts: 3945
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
- Location: Planet 10
I thought this was a non-political thread.Bob78164 wrote:I think that Nate Silver has it exactly right. This was a speech that was designed to, and did, fire up the base. The problem is that it almost certainly fired up both bases, and in 2008, the Democratic base is bigger than the Republican base.
If the bases turn out equally, all Obama needs to do is split the independent vote, and he wins. And after that sarcastic, mean-spirited, mocking speech, I don't see how McCain can hope to do any better than a split. --Bob
No matter where you go, there you are.