Here's Fanny! wrote:I can remember all that, but not the outcome. Ha! Seems like she had to pay him for the apartment lease, but not the $700 for the LSAT she never took because she used it for books. Whoever kept the bed was responsible for the taxes. Dad also got a little chastisement for being a Bad Dad.
I still had it on DVR. This is pretty close, but the issue was a mattress that never arrived, not the taxes. He bought the "$5,000 bed" for $2,500; she had it redelivered without ever accepting it, and claimed she never saw the mattress. JJ ruled that he bought what she had, and basically it was his problem to put a mattress on it.
The LSAT prep course she wanted was $1,400 and he put up $700 for it. Since that wasn't enough, she bought about $500 worth of prep books instead. She said that her trip to TPIR was already funded (from other scholarship money ?!) and didn't come out of the $700. JJ didn't give him anything back on this.
JJ gave him $2400 back on the apt lease he co-signed on and she broke, sticking him with same, but only because she said the law was very clear on that and not because she really wanted to give him anything at all.
Both in court and in the exit interview, he said he wanted to "teach her a lesson". Seems to me you're supposed to do that before they turn 18.