Trump endorses Paxton

[earendel]

Paxton is the nominee.

Trump is 9 for 9 in senate endorsements. The RINOs in the Senate are a disgrace and they need to go. They are assisting the TDS of the democrats and blocking the President's agenda. I think they may be getting the message.

So finally I understand what RINO means - it means that anyone who doesn't agree with Trump is not a true Republican. Perhaps the party should change its name to Trumpublican.

[flockofseagulls104]

Paxton is the nominee.

Trump is 9 for 9 in senate endorsements. The RINOs in the Senate are a disgrace and they need to go. They are assisting the TDS of the democrats and blocking the President's agenda. I think they may be getting the message.

So finally I understand what RINO means - it means that anyone who doesn't agree with Trump is not a true Republican. Perhaps the party should change its name to Trumpublican.

No you don't understand. It's someone who tells us ( and lies about) what they're going to do when they're elected in order to get our vote, then goes along with the dems and the swamp when they get there.

What you don't get is that Trump earns our trust, to a point, because he has not done that. He told us what he would do and he has pretty much kept his word. And he has done that through the incredible pressure, harassment, sabotage and lawfare manufactured by the swamp, the dems, their lapdog press, and the millions of ignorant, useful idiots they import and breed.

[Weyoun]

Paxton is the nominee.

Trump is 9 for 9 in senate endorsements. The RINOs in the Senate are a disgrace and they need to go. They are assisting the TDS of the democrats and blocking the President's agenda. I think they may be getting the message.

So finally I understand what RINO means - it means that anyone who doesn't agree with Trump is not a true Republican. Perhaps the party should change its name to Trumpublican.

No you don't understand. It's someone who tells us ( and lies about) what they're going to do when they're elected in order to get our vote, then goes along with the dems and the swamp when they get there.

What you don't get is that Trump earns our trust, to a point, because he has not done that. He told us what he would do and he has pretty much kept his word. And he has done that through the incredible pressure, harassment and lawfare manufactured by the swamp, the dems, their lapdog press, and the millions of ignorant, useful idiots they import and breed.

Oh really. He said he would avoid wars and (looks around). You guys change your logic when events change

[Weyoun]

That is the mistake your ilk has made right from the beginning. We don't blindly follow what Trump wants. He is the only politician who actually represents what WE WANT. Cornyn (and Massie) are out because they were blocking the Save Act and standing with McConnell and Thune against trump's agenda, appointments and priorities.

Once again you show your hypocrisy by completely ignoring the fact that EVERY DEMOCRAT votes exactly how they are told to vote the vast majority of the time no matter how insane their position is. Is there not even one democrat who thinks letting men or boys into women's or girl's bathrooms is a bad idea? Neither Ossoff nor Warnock would ever vote for the Save Act even though GA supposedly already has Voter ID and Raffy swears no illegals are able to vote and we have record turn out.

We are the ones with minds of our own. You are the lemmings.

PS: I'm sure you heard the part of Paxtons speech that was put together especially by the "fake news" to feed your outrage.

I agree with your assessment of the Democratic party. It seems Fetterman may be the only free thinker in the party, and as a result he is being targeted, much as the Republican Tea Party and Trump were and continue to be because they don't toe the line with the insanity of the uni-party.

Guess y’all don’t really care about the corruption as long as they love the whities and hate the gays and them.

It is pretty wild. Paxton by all accounts is a huge piece of shit. Cornyn was very plausibly about to become the seniormost Republican in the Senate and they tossed him for a total dirtbag.

[silverscreenselect]

It's someone who tells us ( and lies about) what they're going to do when they're elected in order to get our vote, then goes along with the dems and the swamp when they get there.

Cornyn voted with Trump's positions 99.2% of the time. It's hard to find someone more loyal than that.

Of course, if your source, like Flock's, is random twitter posts from anonymous users, then actual facts and statistics don't matter if they get in the way of the story you desperately want to hear.

I can guarantee you that next year, James Talarico will vote with Trump a heck of a lot less than Cornyn would have. But you'll still feel good about purging a RINO. Even if you didn't realize he was a RINO until Trump told you so by endorsing the other guy. Life is easy for people like Flock who don't have to think for themselves; they just listen to Trump.

[BackInTex]

Cornyn voted with Trump's positions 99.2% of the time. It's hard to find someone more loyal than that.

John Cornyn (May 2023), "I think President Trump’s time has passed him by and what’s the most important thing to me is we have a candidate who can actually win.”

Cornyn didn't support Trump in the presidential primary. It's hard to find someone more disloyal than that.

Of course, if your source, like Flock's, is random twitter posts from anonymous users, then actual facts and statistics don't matter if they get in the way of the story you desperately want to hear.

And your sources are pristine.

[Beebs52]

Cornyn voted with Trump's positions 99.2% of the time. It's hard to find someone more loyal than that.

John Cornyn (May 2023), "I think President Trump’s time has passed him by and what’s the most important thing to me is we have a candidate who can actually win.”

Cornyn didn't support Trump in the presidential primary. It's hard to find someone more disloyal than that.

Of course, if your source, like Flock's, is random twitter posts from anonymous users, then actual facts and statistics don't matter if they get in the way of the story you desperately want to hear.

And your sources are pristine.

BiT, this will thrill the other side, but...warring quotes, RINO this RINO that...I find Paxton gross, with no actual value added. I mean, really.

[flockofseagulls104]

Cornyn voted with Trump's positions 99.2% of the time. It's hard to find someone more loyal than that.

John Cornyn (May 2023), "I think President Trump’s time has passed him by and what’s the most important thing to me is we have a candidate who can actually win.”

Cornyn didn't support Trump in the presidential primary. It's hard to find someone more disloyal than that.

Of course, if your source, like Flock's, is random twitter posts from anonymous users, then actual facts and statistics don't matter if they get in the way of the story you desperately want to hear.

And your sources are pristine.

BiT, this will thrill the other side, but...warring quotes, RINO this RINO that...I find Paxton gross, with no actual value added. I mean, really.

I guess you all never heard of this, since fair and honest elections are not of interest to any of you. The House has passed the Save America Act, not once, but twice. Thune has refused to even bring up the Save America Act in the Senate, which will require a valid ID to establish who the f**k you are in order to cast a vote, and will release and require citizen data to be verified before anyone is allowed to vote in a federal election. Just for your information, here's what Grok says about the Save America Act:

Surveys indicate that 92% to 95% of Republicans support the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. Nationwide, the legislation requires voters to provide documented proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections.

Broad Concept Polling (71% - 83% Support): When asked about general election integrity measures—such as requiring government-issued photo identification or documented proof of U.S. citizenship to vote—support ranges between 71% and 83% across various surveys, including majorities of both Republicans and Democrats.

Trump offered to endorse Cornyn if Thune would bring the Save America Act up for a vote. Paxton offered publicly to bow out of the race if Thune would bring the Save America Act up for a vote. DID YOU ALL KNOW THAT?

Neither of those things happened. In fact, Thune stuck his finger in Trump's eye, in 90% of republican's eyes, and in 80% of the American public's eyes. That's why Trump endorsed Paxton. To get ANOTHER RINO out of the Senate.

[BackInTex]

BiT, this will thrill the other side, but...warring quotes, RINO this RINO that...I find Paxton gross, with no actual value added. I mean, really.

I am not a Paxton fan. Far from it. Not a Cornyn fan, either. Cornyn presents well, but performs poorly. We needed to break the incumbancy. Paxton has 6 years, if some other scandal doesn't get him first. He'll be easier to primary than an entrenched Cornyn. Also, Cornyn would make the entire 6 years. Maybe Paxton won't and we get to elect his replacement mid-term (Hunt?). Who knows?

I've seen what a nice clean looking Cornyn does for 24 years, and it is not what I want. So trying something new (but not pretty).

[Beebs52]

BiT, this will thrill the other side, but...warring quotes, RINO this RINO that...I find Paxton gross, with no actual value added. I mean, really.

I am not a Paxton fan. Far from it. Not a Cornyn fan, either. Cornyn presents well, but performs poorly. We needed to break the incumbancy. Paxton has 6 years, if some other scandal doesn't get him first. He'll be easier to primary than an entrenched Cornyn. Also, Cornyn would make the entire 6 years. Maybe Paxton won't and we get to elect his replacement mid-term (Hunt?). Who knows?

I've seen what a nice clean looking Cornyn does for 24 years, and it is not what I want. So trying something new (but not pretty).

Brilliant

[silverscreenselect]

Just for your information, here's what Grok says about the Save America Act:

Grok is Twitter's AI. So Flock has now graduated from anonymous Twitter sources to Twitter's AI that relies on anonymous Twitter sources. And while there is support for the broad concepts SAVE is supposed to cover, once people know how the bill actually works, that support drops tremendously.

[wbtravis007]

John Cornyn (May 2023), "I think President Trump’s time has passed him by and what’s the most important thing to me is we have a candidate who can actually win.”

Cornyn didn't support Trump in the presidential primary. It's hard to find someone more disloyal than that.




And your sources are pristine.

BiT, this will thrill the other side, but...warring quotes, RINO this RINO that...I find Paxton gross, with no actual value added. I mean, really.

I guess you all never heard of this, since fair and honest elections are not of interest to any of you. The House has passed the Save America Act, not once, but twice. Thune has refused to even bring up the Save America Act in the Senate, which will require a valid ID to establish who the f**k you are in order to cast a vote, and will release and require citizen data to be verified before anyone is allowed to vote in a federal election. Just for your information, here's what Grok says about the Save America Act:

Surveys indicate that 92% to 95% of Republicans support the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. Nationwide, the legislation requires voters to provide documented proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections.

Broad Concept Polling (71% - 83% Support): When asked about general election integrity measures—such as requiring government-issued photo identification or documented proof of U.S. citizenship to vote—support ranges between 71% and 83% across various surveys, including majorities of both Republicans and Democrats.

Trump offered to endorse Cornyn if Thune would bring the Save America Act up for a vote. Paxton offered publicly to bow out of the race if Thune would bring the Save America Act up for a vote. DID YOU ALL KNOW THAT?

Neither of those things happened. In fact, Thune stuck his finger in Trump's eye, in 90% of republican's eyes, and in 80% of the American public's eyes. That's why Trump endorsed Paxton. To get ANOTHER RINO out of the Senate.

Wrong again, Maude. After the primary, where Paxton finished second to Cornyn, and Paxton was afraid that Trump would endorse Cornyn, he said he’d drop out if Thune could achieve the suspension of the filibuster rule in order to pass that bill. He knew, of course, that that was not going to happen. That was the smartest thing that I’ve ever seen Paxton do. He definitely knows how to ring Trump’s bell. It worked. After the primary, Trump had promised that he would endorse one of them “very soon,” and then he didn’t until the last minute when it was obvious to most knowledgeable observers that Paxton’s turnout was a lot higher than Cornyn’s. It wasn’t Trump’s endorsement that caused the outcome. The expected outcome is what caused the endorsement.

[flockofseagulls104]

BiT, this will thrill the other side, but...warring quotes, RINO this RINO that...I find Paxton gross, with no actual value added. I mean, really.

I guess you all never heard of this, since fair and honest elections are not of interest to any of you. The House has passed the Save America Act, not once, but twice. Thune has refused to even bring up the Save America Act in the Senate, which will require a valid ID to establish who the f**k you are in order to cast a vote, and will release and require citizen data to be verified before anyone is allowed to vote in a federal election. Just for your information, here's what Grok says about the Save America Act:

Surveys indicate that 92% to 95% of Republicans support the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. Nationwide, the legislation requires voters to provide documented proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections.

Broad Concept Polling (71% - 83% Support): When asked about general election integrity measures—such as requiring government-issued photo identification or documented proof of U.S. citizenship to vote—support ranges between 71% and 83% across various surveys, including majorities of both Republicans and Democrats.

Trump offered to endorse Cornyn if Thune would bring the Save America Act up for a vote. Paxton offered publicly to bow out of the race if Thune would bring the Save America Act up for a vote. DID YOU ALL KNOW THAT?

Neither of those things happened. In fact, Thune stuck his finger in Trump's eye, in 90% of republican's eyes, and in 80% of the American public's eyes. That's why Trump endorsed Paxton. To get ANOTHER RINO out of the Senate.

Wrong again, Maude. After the primary, where Paxton finished second to Cornyn, and Paxton was afraid that Trump would endorse Cornyn, he said he’d drop out if Thune could achieve the suspension of the filibuster rule in order to pass that bill. He knew, of course, that that was not going to happen. That was the smartest thing that I’ve ever seen Paxton do. He definitely knows how to ring Trump’s bell. It worked. After the primary, Trump had promised that he would endorse one of them “very soon,” and then he didn’t until the last minute when it was obvious to most knowledgeable observers that Paxton’s turnout was a lot higher than Cornyn’s. It wasn’t Trump’s endorsement that caused the outcome. The expected outcome is what caused the endorsement.

Thanks for the leftist spin. Saved SSS the trouble.

[Beebs52]

I guess you all never heard of this, since fair and honest elections are not of interest to any of you. The House has passed the Save America Act, not once, but twice. Thune has refused to even bring up the Save America Act in the Senate, which will require a valid ID to establish who the f**k you are in order to cast a vote, and will release and require citizen data to be verified before anyone is allowed to vote in a federal election. Just for your information, here's what Grok says about the Save America Act:



Trump offered to endorse Cornyn if Thune would bring the Save America Act up for a vote. Paxton offered publicly to bow out of the race if Thune would bring the Save America Act up for a vote. DID YOU ALL KNOW THAT?

Neither of those things happened. In fact, Thune stuck his finger in Trump's eye, in 90% of republican's eyes, and in 80% of the American public's eyes. That's why Trump endorsed Paxton. To get ANOTHER RINO out of the Senate.

Wrong again, Maude. After the primary, where Paxton finished second to Cornyn, and Paxton was afraid that Trump would endorse Cornyn, he said he’d drop out if Thune could achieve the suspension of the filibuster rule in order to pass that bill. He knew, of course, that that was not going to happen. That was the smartest thing that I’ve ever seen Paxton do. He definitely knows how to ring Trump’s bell. It worked. After the primary, Trump had promised that he would endorse one of them “very soon,” and then he didn’t until the last minute when it was obvious to most knowledgeable observers that Paxton’s turnout was a lot higher than Cornyn’s. It wasn’t Trump’s endorsement that caused the outcome. The expected outcome is what caused the endorsement.

Thanks for the leftist spin. Saved SSS the trouble.

Flock, he,'s probably correct.

[wbtravis007]

I guess you all never heard of this, since fair and honest elections are not of interest to any of you. The House has passed the Save America Act, not once, but twice. Thune has refused to even bring up the Save America Act in the Senate, which will require a valid ID to establish who the f**k you are in order to cast a vote, and will release and require citizen data to be verified before anyone is allowed to vote in a federal election. Just for your information, here's what Grok says about the Save America Act:



Trump offered to endorse Cornyn if Thune would bring the Save America Act up for a vote. Paxton offered publicly to bow out of the race if Thune would bring the Save America Act up for a vote. DID YOU ALL KNOW THAT?

Neither of those things happened. In fact, Thune stuck his finger in Trump's eye, in 90% of republican's eyes, and in 80% of the American public's eyes. That's why Trump endorsed Paxton. To get ANOTHER RINO out of the Senate.

Wrong again, Maude. After the primary, where Paxton finished second to Cornyn, and Paxton was afraid that Trump would endorse Cornyn, he said he’d drop out if Thune could achieve the suspension of the filibuster rule in order to pass that bill. He knew, of course, that that was not going to happen. That was the smartest thing that I’ve ever seen Paxton do. He definitely knows how to ring Trump’s bell. It worked. After the primary, Trump had promised that he would endorse one of them “very soon,” and then he didn’t until the last minute, when it was obvious to most knowledgeable observers that Paxton’s turnout was a lot higher than Cornyn’s. It wasn’t Trump’s endorsement that caused the outcome. The expected outcome is what caused the endorsement.

Thanks for the leftist spin. Saved SSS the trouble.

DID YOU KNOW THAT?

[flockofseagulls104]

How did he know it would never happen?

[wbtravis007]

How did he know it would never happen?

Paxton unselfishly falling on his sword as a matter of principle?
Usually people who are as naive as you are downright adorable.

[flockofseagulls104]

How did he know it would never happen?

Paxton unselfishly falling on his sword as a matter of principle?
Usually people who are as naive as you are downright adorable.

Cornyn? Paxton? Texas is not my state anymore, and I know that I don't know what I don't know. You can elect who you want. All I know is that some people I have given some trust to indicate Cornyn stood in the way of passing the Save Act. That is my interest in this. Why he would do this when it is a 90-10 issue in his party is troubling.

That is one reason why I would go with Paxton. The main reason is travis seems to like Cornyn.

[silverscreenselect]

Texas is not my state anymore, and I know that I don't know what I don't know. You can elect who you want.

Cheer up, Travis. Flock doesn't like to discuss Georgia politics either, and that's probably because he's embarrassed at his choices in the upcoming runoff election.

[flockofseagulls104]

Texas is not my state anymore, and I know that I don't know what I don't know. You can elect who you want.

Cheer up, Travis. Flock doesn't like to discuss Georgia politics either, and that's probably because he's embarrassed at his choices in the upcoming runoff election.

I would be glad to discuss GA politics with someone I could have a decent discussion with.

Just so your feelings aren't hurt too much: It is wonderful that the main RINOs got beat - Rattburger, Sterling and Carr. If any of them got the nomination I would have to seriously look at what garbage your side nominated. But just for a couple of seconds before I had to puke, I'm sure.

[wbtravis007]

How did he know it would never happen?

Paxton unselfishly falling on his sword as a matter of principle?
Usually people who are as naive as you are downright adorable.

Cornyn? Paxton? Texas is not my state anymore, and I know that I don't know what I don't know. You can elect who you want. All I know is that some people I have given some trust to indicate Cornyn stood in the way of passing the Save Act. That is my interest in this. Why he would do this when it is a 90-10 issue in his party is troubling.

That is one reason why I would go with Paxton. The main reason is travis seems to like Cornyn.

I already said I voted for Paxton.

[silverscreenselect]

I would be glad to discuss GA politics with someone I could have a decent discussion with.

I'm sure you could have what you consider a decent discussion with either Burt Jones or Rick Jackson.

The rest of us would consider it a Donald Trump suck-up-fest.

[jarnon]

The Democrats made history in Texas by nominating their first transgender senate candidate.

shut up you ugly fuck

Miller knows Talarico isn’t trans. He was trying to taunt the libs and he succeeded. As for the DNC, they responded as if calling Talarico trans is a horrible insult. Not a good look when you’re courting LGBT voters nationwide. Public opinion is nearly unanimous that the DNC is an embarrassment.