Re: 2000 Mules

[flockofseagulls104]

Apparently, the original thread is stuck in the other forum. So I have to resurrect it here, as I want to add to it.

There is uncharacteristic optimism among the Election Integrity community, of which I am a part, in Georgia recently. However, I remain skeptical, as many of us do, until someone is actually held accountable for the election crimes that we all KNOW have been committed here in GA related to the 2020 and the 2022 elections.

This is arguably the incident that started the ball rolling. This represents INDISPUTABLE and ADMITTED proof that the Georgia 2020 election should not have been certified according to LAW. That, combined with the conclusions submitted by Skandalakis in dropping the Fani Willis case have finally gotten the DOJ to step in and join us in trying to, at long last, get to the truth. Fani's testimony and melt down at last week's committee hearing just added to it. All the State of Georgia has done for 5 years is try and HIDE the truth.

So, I know that the evidence that the 2020 election in Georgia was rigged is valid and voluminous. I have seen and examined much of it. I know and trust some of the people who have conducted the research and tried to get it recognised and acted upon, only to be stifled by corrupt and conflicted lawyers, judges and elected officials. I, in a small way, am one of them. There are tons of other evidence that because of judicial tricks and finagling, have not been considered. Curling v Raffensperger. DeKalb GOP v Raffensperger. SEB 2022-25. etc, etc....

I am cautiously optimistic that we will begin to see some action on this front relatively soon. Whether something happens relative to accountability is anyone's guess, as for me, I would not hold my breath. But I hope something does, for all our sakes. Because if we cannot trust our elections, we do not have a country.

And to be at long last proven right.

[tlynn78]

Apparently, the original thread is stuck in the other forum. So I have to resurrect it here, as I want to add to it.

There is uncharacteristic optimism among the Election Integrity community, of which I am a part, in Georgia recently. However, I remain skeptical, as many of us do, until someone is actually held accountable for the election crimes that we all KNOW have been committed here in GA related to the 2020 and the 2022 elections.

This is arguably the incident that started the ball rolling. This represents INDISPUTABLE and ADMITTED proof that the Georgia 2020 election should not have been certified according to LAW. That, combined with the conclusions submitted by Skandalakis in dropping the Fani Willis case have finally gotten the DOJ to step in and join us in trying to, at long last, get to the truth. Fani's testimony and melt down at last week's committee hearing just added to it. All the State of Georgia has done for 5 years is try and HIDE the truth.

So, I know that the evidence that the 2020 election in Georgia was rigged is valid and voluminous. I have seen and examined much of it. I know and trust some of the people who have conducted the research and tried to get it recognised and acted upon, only to be stifled by corrupt and conflicted lawyers, judges and elected officials. I, in a small way, am one of them. There are tons of other evidence that because of judicial tricks and finagling, have not been considered. Curling v Raffensperger. DeKalb GOP v Raffensperger. SEB 2022-25. etc, etc....

I am cautiously optimistic that we will begin to see some action on this front relatively soon. Whether something happens relative to accountability is anyone's guess, as for me, I would not hold my breath. But I hope something does, for all our sakes. Because if we cannot trust our elections, we do not have a country.

And to be at long last proven right.

Same. Im sure the usual suspects are composing their "you were right all along" posts as I type.

[flockofseagulls104]

Here's another example of how to sweep evidence under the rug. Read the thread and comments. Especially the one by RJ LAUGHLIN, SSS.

Bob Coovert has produced several judges.

[silverscreenselect]

Flock:

Wake me when someone besides your little bunch of Twitter cronies decide there's any actual proof of election fraud.

[flockofseagulls104]

Flock:

Wake me when someone besides your little bunch of Twitter cronies decide there's any actual proof of election fraud.

Sorry to interrupt your wet dream about fat rednecks with assault weapons, but the proof was posted for you. In just this one instance, (there are many more complaints the SOS has been sitting on for years) the attorney for Fulton County was forced to admit they broke the law and that 315,000 votes from Fulton County did not have a legal chain of custody and should NOT have been certified. I know you are sleeping, but let me ask you: what are laws for? Are we supposed to follow them, or do we get dispensation if we find them inconvenient?

Wake up SSS.

[silverscreenselect]

[the attorney for Fulton County was forced to admit they broke the law and that 315,000 votes from Fulton County did not have a legal chain of custody and should NOT have been certified.

Not quite right Flock. I read the rules, and they state that the poll manager and witnesses shall sign the tapes. However, they do not specify what happens if the signatures are missing. Not every error requires invalidating the results. Instead, the rules say:

If the poll manager or the witnesses have reason to believe that printed tapes are not a true and correct tabulation of the ballots scanned by that ballot scanner, the poll manager or witness shall document the reasons and evidence for that belief and inform the election superintendent, who shall take appropriate action, in his or her discretion, so that the ballots in the ballot box associated with the ballot scanner are accurately tabulated.

I'm sure Flock would have informed me if one of the witnesses had objected to the count in any precinct. But none did, and none has come forward in five years. There is a strong presumption in Georgia for the validity of tabulated votes. Further, certification of the results is an administrative function, and court cases have required boards to certify results despite suspicions of errors or fraud. If someone had objected on Election Day, it would have been investigated. You can't claim five years later that the election shouldn't have been certified.