Today's election results

[flockofseagulls104]

Wow. So, you’d effectively condone the killing of babies (your characterization) by voting against a bill that would prohibit that.

That does surprise me.

I will try and accommodate you here.
This is a rhetorical situation, but if it ever happened, I would first try and put together a rhetorical coalition of rhetorical legislators who would push for a rhetorical special panel to look at permanent rhetorical solutions to this issue. Failing that, I would lobby and support whatever rhetorical amendments to the rhetorical bill to try and make it at least rhetorically acceptable to the other side.

This could be a Trump tweet. He knows all the best words, you know.

He just doesn't know what they mean, or how to use them in sentences.

You on TDS too? So sorry. Maybe you should drink some bleach. Fix you right up.

[wbtravis007]

I will try and accommodate you here.
This is a rhetorical situation, but if it ever happened, I would first try and put together a rhetorical coalition of rhetorical legislators who would push for a rhetorical special panel to look at permanent rhetorical solutions to this issue. Failing that, I would lobby and support whatever rhetorical amendments to the rhetorical bill to try and make it at least rhetorically acceptable to the other side.

This could be a Trump tweet. He knows all the best words, you know.

He just doesn't know what they mean, or how to use them in sentences.

You on TDS too? So sorry. Maybe you should drink some bleach. Fix you right up.

You probably missed my point.

[flockofseagulls104]

This could be a Trump tweet. He knows all the best words, you know.

He just doesn't know what they mean, or how to use them in sentences.

You on TDS too? So sorry. Maybe you should drink some bleach. Fix you right up.

You probably missed my point.

No, not really. Bringing in Trump where the subject has nothing to do with him is a symptom of TDS. Everything, to you TDS suffers, is about Trump. Obsessed, you are..... SSSSS Yesssss my Precious....!

Happy (trump) Thanksgiving! GOOLLLLUM!

[wbtravis007]

You on TDS too? So sorry. Maybe you should drink some bleach. Fix you right up.

You probably missed my point.

No, not really. Bringing in Trump where the subject has nothing to do with him is a symptom of TDS. Everything, to you TDS suffers, is about Trump. Obsessed, you are..... SSSSS Yesssss my Precious....!

Happy (trump) Thanksgiving! GOOLLLLUM!

Need a translation here if anybody’s interested enough and willing.

I mean, I know what is behind some of it, but he kind of lost me there towards the end.

[flockofseagulls104]

You probably missed my point.

No, not really. Bringing in Trump where the subject has nothing to do with him is a symptom of TDS. Everything, to you TDS suffers, is about Trump. Obsessed, you are..... SSSSS Yesssss my Precious....!

Happy (trump) Thanksgiving! GOOLLLLUM!

Need a translation here if anybody’s interested enough and willing.

I mean, I know what is behind some of it, but he kind of lost me there towards the end.

It means it is pretty obvious you have Trump Derangement Syndrome. I thought I'd phrase it in a way you might understand.

[wbtravis007]

No, not really. Bringing in Trump where the subject has nothing to do with him is a symptom of TDS. Everything, to you TDS suffers, is about Trump. Obsessed, you are..... SSSSS Yesssss my Precious....!

Happy (trump) Thanksgiving! GOOLLLLUM!

Need a translation here if anybody’s interested enough and willing.

I mean, I know what is behind some of it, but he kind of lost me there towards the end.

It means it is pretty obvious you have Trump Derangement Syndrome. I thought I'd phrase it in a way you might understand.

What, I can’t make fun of you by comparing you to another loser?

What kind of person would mention a name that has nothing to do with the subject of the thread in a post that was criticizing someone for doing that?

(That’s a rhetorical question.)

[flockofseagulls104]

Need a translation here if anybody’s interested enough and willing.

I mean, I know what is behind some of it, but he kind of lost me there towards the end.

It means it is pretty obvious you have Trump Derangement Syndrome. I thought I'd phrase it in a way you might understand.

What, I can’t make fun of you by comparing you to another loser?

What kind of person would mention a name that has nothing to do with the subject of the thread in a post that was criticizing someone for doing that?

(That’s a rhetorical question.)

Well, you for one. So I phrased my response in a format you'd be familiar with. And thanks for admitting, once again, that the only reason you're here is to make fun of me. If that's your purpose, why don't you pick one of the lefties? They'd be a lot more interesting for you to go after. None of them seems to have a sense of humor, and they would probably take your bait. (I'll bet you could really get under doc's skin.) Potentially a lot more chortles for you. Or why don't you just go play on the wwtbam forum, and stop being a PIA here, please.

[wbtravis007]

It means it is pretty obvious you have Trump Derangement Syndrome. I thought I'd phrase it in a way you might understand.

What, I can’t make fun of you by comparing you to another loser?

What kind of person would mention a name that has nothing to do with the subject of the thread in a post that was criticizing someone for doing that?

(That’s a rhetorical question.)

Well, you for one. So I phrased my response in a format you'd be familiar with. And thanks for admitting, once again, that the only reason you're here is to make fun of me. If that's your purpose, why don't you pick one of the lefties? They'd be a lot more interesting for you to go after. None of them seems to have a sense of humor, and they would probably take your bait. (I'll bet you could really get under doc's skin.) Potentially a lot more chortles for you. Or why don't you just go play on the wwtbam forum, and stop being a PIA here, please.

I think you must have missed my point again.

IC.