Source?SOX404Guru wrote:Most women certainly have more females than males in their circle of friends.
Seriously dude, if this were a Freshman Comp Essay, it would have earned an "F"
That just might be the case.silvercamaro wrote:Let us consider the possibility that all of this is a masterful PR campaign by ABC, intended to get us to watch Cavemen.
Sting had me tape Caveman. I have yet to get to it in the ever expanding library. I did ask him today if we had to watch all of them in the can after seeing the first one.MarleysGh0st wrote:The Cavemen are actually urbane sophisticates. They just have an adversion to razors and scissors.silvercamaro wrote:Let us consider the possibility that all of this is a masterful PR campaign by ABC, intended to get us to watch Cavemen.
Thanks for your solicitous statement. As I said, it's been five years. The surgery appears to have been successful. One is never cured.SOX404Guru wrote:I sincerely hope that the BC surgery was successful Beebs52.
I feel it is accurate to state that some diseases are more deserving than others. BC research receives far more funding per death than any other disease. In fact, if all of the funding for colon cancer only benefited women, they would still receive less money per death. Even the federal government provides a quarter of a billion dollars more on researching BC than colon cancer.
But kudos to women for generating more money for BC. The biggest problem I have with it is that due to media bias women women significantly overstate their risk of BC. In fact, only 8% of women believe heart disease represents their greatest health risk. They believe BC is their top health risk, even though lung cancer kills 70% more women than BC.
BTW: Even women diagnosed with BC are much more likely to die of heart disease.
Wouldn't you agree that if one disease killed fewer people yet received a disproportionate amount of funding that that disease should be considered less deserving?
I would include outtakes of my book on the matter, but I've already upset too many people.
Godspeed on your recovery!
He does - but way off the chart.starfish1113 wrote:You must admit that it reads very HoltDaddian, though. Like HoltDad on steroids! Lots of faux concern for fellow posters followed by non-sensical statements designed to inflame.peacock2121 wrote:I apologize to HoltDad.
He is so not as bad as this guy.
Not even close.
Why, you, you generous open-book,you! I LIKE avarice. In fact, I like the red ones better than the black ones. And the twizzler ones.Rexer25 wrote:I agree entirely. There is not enough money spent to combat avarice and deceit.SOX404Guru wrote:
I feel it is accurate to state that some diseases are more deserving than others.
Thanks.christie1111 wrote:This made me laugh!TheCalvinator24 wrote: I infer that your misuse of the word "infers" implies that you are less intelligent than all of the women on this Bored.
Boy did he come to the wrong message Bored!