More people tuned in to watch McCain's acceptance speech than Obama's.
EDIT: I looked at the article again. It doesn't say that there were more viewers. Just that it got a higher rating. I think that will translate to more viewers, but I believe it is possible to have a higher rating with fewer viewers.
Based on Overnights
- TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
- Contact:
Based on Overnights
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
- nitrah55
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:46 am
- Location: Section 239, Yankee Stadium
Re: Based on Overnights
Nielsen ratings are stated in terms of rating/share. "Rating" is the percentage of TVs in the US which are tuned to a particular program. "Share" is the percentage of TVs in use at that time which are tuned to a particular program.TheCalvinator24 wrote:More people tuned in to watch McCain's acceptance speech than Obama's.
EDIT: I looked at the article again. It doesn't say that there were more viewers. Just that it got a higher rating. I think that will translate to more viewers, but I believe it is possible to have a higher rating with fewer viewers.
This is, of course, an inexact science, since some people start to watch things, and then stop in the middle (notice the big lead-in for McCain's speech on NBC, then the lower overall number later).
Another source, just quoting total viewers said Obama got about 38 million, Palin got about 37.2 million, and I haven't seen that number for McCain yet.
Each of these are, by the way, better numbers than the opening ceremonies of the Olympics or the finale of American Idol. Which I find encouraging.
I am about 25% sure of this.
- sunflower
- Bored Hooligan
- Posts: 8010
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
- Location: East Hartford, CT
- themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7634
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
I wish I had been watching that instead of the Gamecocks embarrassing loss to Vanderbilt
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.