Senator Kennedy?

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 22147
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Senator Kennedy?

#1 Post by Bob78164 » Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:41 pm

Not that one. Another one. Maybe.

Multiple outlets are reporting that Caroline Kennedy has expressed interest in being appointed to the Senate seat soon to be vacated by Hillary Clinton. I haven't done the math myself, but I think it's the same seat that her late uncle once held. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
NellyLunatic1980
Posts: 7935
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:54 am
Contact:

Re: Senator Kennedy?

#2 Post by NellyLunatic1980 » Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:42 pm

Bob78164 wrote:Not that one. Another one. Maybe.

Multiple outlets are reporting that Caroline Kennedy has expressed interest in being appointed to the Senate seat soon to be vacated by Hillary Clinton. I haven't done the math myself, but I think it's the same seat that her late uncle once held. --Bob
Let's see:

Daniel Moynihan preceded Clinton.

James Buckley preceded Moynihan.

Charles Goodell preceded Buckley.

RFK preceded Goodell.

Your math is correct.

User avatar
etaoin22
FNGD Forum Moderator
Posts: 3655
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:09 pm

Re: Senator Kennedy?

#3 Post by etaoin22 » Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:28 pm

2006 - 1964 = 42 divisible by six, so it is the same seat. only one of the holders in between got their name on the cover of a Neil Young album, however.

User avatar
SportsFan68
No Scritches!!!
Posts: 21300
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: Senator Kennedy?

#4 Post by SportsFan68 » Sat Dec 06, 2008 12:35 pm

etaoin22 wrote:2006 - 1964 = 42 divisible by six, so it is the same seat. only one of the holders in between got their name on the cover of a Neil Young album, however.
Pea's new post about this reminded me to look up who the cover person was.

Couldn't find it -- anybody know offhand?
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

Re: Senator Kennedy?

#5 Post by peacock2121 » Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:11 pm

My apologies.

I saw this earlier in the day and assumed it was about Ted. I skipped over the thread. I then went to aol and saw the story about Caroline and didn't remember there was a post here about it.

I get a wee bit annoyed when another posts about something that has already been posted.

I am a wee bit annoyed at me.

User avatar
clem21
Nose Exploder
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: Got the New York City Rhythm

Re: Senator Kennedy?

#6 Post by clem21 » Sat Dec 06, 2008 5:22 pm

This would make me mad. :evil:

I'm a big fan of Andrew Cuomo as someone who has done plenty in his own right and not relying on his name. I trust him to do what's best for the state of New York because he's been working for us for years now.

I have no doubt that Caroline is a smart, well-educated attorney. New York's got plenty of those. She also has little to no government experience and if the rumors are correct, she wasn't asked about the job she called to ask for it. Sounds like a power grab that is reliant on her last name to me.
"Some people never go crazy, What truly horrible lives they must live..."
-Charles Bukowski

2011 [Bleep]house Rats Award Winner
2011 I've Been Everywhere New England Region Co-Champion

User avatar
nitrah55
Posts: 1613
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:46 am
Location: Section 239, Yankee Stadium

Re: Senator Kennedy?

#7 Post by nitrah55 » Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:56 pm

It has been suggested that Governor Paterson would name CK to the Senate, with the proviso that she not run for the seat in 2010.

The logic being that Paterson doesn't need to tick anyone off by choosing a "permanent" Senator (there will be 2 elections for this seat over the next 4 years) in the midst of a huge wrangle with the state legislature over cutting spending, and the people of New York would be better served by a good, old-fashioned primary and election event two years hence.
I am about 25% sure of this.

Post Reply