What just happened in Venezuela is happening here

[flockofseagulls104]

Maduro is stealing the election. Because he controls who counts the votes. The votes don't count. It's who counts the votes.

Won't happen here? It's already happening.

Google is erasing trump. Try googling 'assassination attempt on tru' . No mention of trump in the predictive entries. Don't take my word for it. Do it yourself. Duck Duck Go returns trump entries. Google doesn't.

Google 'president donald'. No mention of trump in the predictive entries. Do it yourself. This random guy on twitter says it works right in Canada. Not here.

Many people reporting that Facebook is censoring the trump photo.

Ministry of Truth at work.

Don't let them win.

[silverscreenselect]

Google 'president donald'. No mention of trump in the predictive entries. Do it yourself. This random guy on twitter says it works right in Canada. Not here.

When I typed in "president," the first entry was "president's executive powers," the next was Trump, the next was "president donald duck" and the next was Biden. When I added "president d," Trump came up on top (followed by "president donald duck").

President Donald Duck is a popular search right now because Elon Musk claimed it ranked on top when he tried the algorithm, leading to his claims. Considering that Trump has the CEO of one of the world's most popular social media sites shilling for him nonstop, he shouldn't complain too much about Google. Every time I log into Twitter (now X), the first thing I see is one of Musk's political posts.

[flockofseagulls104]

Google 'president donald'. No mention of trump in the predictive entries. Do it yourself. This random guy on twitter says it works right in Canada. Not here.

When I typed in "president," the first entry was "president's executive powers," the next was Trump, the next was "president donald duck" and the next was Biden. When I added "president d," Trump came up on top (followed by "president donald duck").

President Donald Duck is a popular search right now because Elon Musk claimed it ranked on top when he tried the algorithm, leading to his claims. Considering that Trump has the CEO of one of the world's most popular social media sites shilling for him nonstop, he shouldn't complain too much about Google. Every time I log into Twitter (now X), the first thing I see is one of Musk's political posts.

Just tried it now. Google adjusted it since they were caught. What else are they doing?

[silverscreenselect]

Many people reporting that Facebook is censoring the trump photo.

This one is more complicated. After the shooting, people started circulating a version of this photo showing the Secret Service agents grinning. This was apparently intended to "prove" that the shooting had been staged. You can see the the agent "smiling" in this shot.



Facebook quite properly issued a warning against the smiling version of the photo but apparently their algorithm also caught the real version as well. The company has since issued an apology: "This was an error. This fact check was initially applied to a doctored photo showing the secret service agents smiling, and in some cases our systems incorrectly applied that fact check to the real photo. This has been fixed and we apologize for the mistake."

https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world ... fact-check

[flockofseagulls104]

Many people reporting that Facebook is censoring the trump photo.

This one is more complicated. After the shooting, people started circulating a version of this photo showing the Secret Service agents grinning. This was apparently intended to "prove" that the shooting had been staged. You can see the the agent "smiling" in this shot.



Facebook quite properly issued a warning against the smiling version of the photo but apparently their algorithm also caught the real version as well. The company has since issued an apology: "This was an error. This fact check was initially applied to a doctored photo showing the secret service agents smiling, and in some cases our systems incorrectly applied that fact check to the real photo. This has been fixed and we apologize for the mistake."

https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world ... fact-check

When will they apologize for censoring Hunter's Laptop before the 2020 election? Or for censoring and canceling people who question the results of 2020? When will they admit there is justifiable and documented basis for questioning the results of 2020?

The patriotic people in Venezuela are fighting back against THEIR stolen election. Pray they have more success than their brothers and sisters in Brazil. We have one more chance to avoid Brazil's and Venezuela's fate. You don't have to vote for Trump if you don't want to. Just don't vote for democrats in November. Make them have to use every one of their fake registrations to try and steal it. Maybe they won't have enough. Thousands of us will be watching EVERYTHING about our election.

[BackInTex]

Many people reporting that Facebook is censoring the trump photo.

This one is more complicated. After the shooting, people started circulating a version of this photo showing the Secret Service agents grinning. This was apparently intended to "prove" that the shooting had been staged. You can see the the agent "smiling" in this shot.



Facebook quite properly issued a warning against the smiling version of the photo but apparently their algorithm also caught the real version as well. The company has since issued an apology: "This was an error. This fact check was initially applied to a doctored photo showing the secret service agents smiling, and in some cases our systems incorrectly applied that fact check to the real photo. This has been fixed and we apologize for the mistake."

https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world ... fact-check

When will they apologize for censoring Hunter's Laptop before the 2020 election? Or for censoring and canceling people who question the results of 2020? When will they admit there is justifiable and documented basis for questioning the results of 2020?

The patriotic people in Venezuela are fighting back against THEIR stolen election. Pray they have more success than their brothers and sisters in Brazil. We have one more chance to avoid Brazil's and Venezuela's fate. You don't have to vote for Trump if you don't want to. Just don't vote for democrats in November. Make them have to use every one of their fake registrations to try and steal it. Maybe they won't have enough. Thousands of us will be watching EVERYTHING about our election.

And what about all the unvacinated that haven't died yet. Something's wrong.

[silverscreenselect]

And what about all the unvacinated that haven't died yet. Something's wrong.

For thousands of years, most people in the world didn't die of smallpox or polio. It doesn't mean those vaccines weren't lifesavers.

[flockofseagulls104]

Another spectacular success by the biden puppet administration. We lifted sanctions on Venezuela in exchange for a promise of free and fair elections. I guess they were free and fair by 2020 standards. Put that on the list of biden accomplishments. Right up there with the Afghanistan withdrawal.

[flockofseagulls104]

And what about all the unvacinated that haven't died yet. Something's wrong.

For thousands of years, most people in the world didn't die of smallpox or polio. It doesn't mean those vaccines weren't lifesavers.

Your responses/excuses are getting more and more in the bobjuch range.

[kroxquo]

Maduro is stealing the election. Because he controls who counts the votes. The votes don't count. It's who counts the votes.

Won't happen here? It's already happening.

Google is erasing trump. Try googling 'assassination attempt on tru' . No mention of trump in the predictive entries. Don't take my word for it. Do it yourself. Duck Duck Go returns trump entries. Google doesn't.

Google 'president donald'. No mention of trump in the predictive entries. Do it yourself. This random guy on twitter says it works right in Canada. Not here.

Many people reporting that Facebook is censoring the trump photo.

Ministry of Truth at work.

Don't let them win.

Is there any scenario in which Trump loses the election that you would accept as valid?

[earendel]

Google is erasing trump. Try googling 'assassination attempt on tru' . No mention of trump in the predictive entries. Don't take my word for it. Do it yourself. Duck Duck Go returns trump entries. Google doesn't.

Google 'president donald'. No mention of trump in the predictive entries. Do it yourself. This random guy on twitter says it works right in Canada. Not here.

OK, I tried "assassination attempt on tru..." and before I completed the first "assas" the predictive text gave "assassination attempt on donald trump". Then I tried "president donald" and before I could complete the first word, "Donald Trump, 45th US preident" came up in the predictive text. And I'm not in Canada. (If I knew how to post screenshots I would do so.)

[flockofseagulls104]

Maduro is stealing the election. Because he controls who counts the votes. The votes don't count. It's who counts the votes.

Won't happen here? It's already happening.

Google is erasing trump. Try googling 'assassination attempt on tru' . No mention of trump in the predictive entries. Don't take my word for it. Do it yourself. Duck Duck Go returns trump entries. Google doesn't.

Google 'president donald'. No mention of trump in the predictive entries. Do it yourself. This random guy on twitter says it works right in Canada. Not here.

Many people reporting that Facebook is censoring the trump photo.

Ministry of Truth at work.

Don't let them win.

Is there any scenario in which Trump loses the election that you would accept as valid?

I will look at the data. I already have a list of thousands of invalid and illegal voter roll registrations that the election officials refuse to act upon. Just in my own county. In the state the number is in the hundreds of thousands. This doesn't include illegal aliens that are registered. TPTB have made it impossible to track them. A vote cast by any one of them invalidates my vote. That is a Constitutional Civil Rights violation. The people who count the votes know we are watching. And I am just watching the voter roll. There are more people watching the electronic manipulation. The main question is if they have the cajones to unleash the level of fraud they will need to steal it this time. Will people like you believe ANY democrat is popular enough to get 100 million votes? You believed biden got more votes than your messiah Obama ever got. So it's possible they can count on your gullibility.

How much proof will you have to ignore before you accept that the 2020 election was manipulated? Or do you just dismiss these things as 'spreadsheets' like trollboy does?

[silverscreenselect]

Will people like you believe ANY democrat is popular enough to get 100 million votes? You believed biden got more votes than your messiah Obama ever got. So it's possible they can count on your gullibility.

How much proof will you have to ignore before you accept that the 2020 election was manipulated? Or do you just dismiss these things as 'spreadsheets' like trollboy does?

2012 vote totals: Obama 65.9 million
Romney 60.9 million

2016 vote totals: Clinton 65.8 million
Trump 63.0 million

2020 vote totals: Biden 81.3 million
Trump 74.2 million

Percentage of voting age population that voted: 2012 - 53.8%; 2016 - 54.8%; 2020 - 62.0%. (The 2020 figure was the highest since 1964)

Biden's bump in votes was largely a direct result of the effort in many states (including Georgia) to facilitate mail-in voting during the pandemic, as well as public reaction, pro and con, to Trump's first term. Funny how you don't claim there was anything fraudulent about Trump receiving 11 million more votes in 2020 despite a lot of people souring on his presidency during those four years.

Again, I repeat, since it's obviously too complicated for your limited intellectual capacity, "proof" isn't proof unless and until it's verified. For now, it's just numbers on spreadsheets people like you play with that hasn't impressed a single court. I could come up with "proof" the moon is made of green cheese. I'd have about as much success in impressing the courts as your buddies have.

[flockofseagulls104]

Will people like you believe ANY democrat is popular enough to get 100 million votes? You believed biden got more votes than your messiah Obama ever got. So it's possible they can count on your gullibility.

How much proof will you have to ignore before you accept that the 2020 election was manipulated? Or do you just dismiss these things as 'spreadsheets' like trollboy does?

2012 vote totals: Obama 65.9 million
Romney 60.9 million

2016 vote totals: Clinton 65.8 million
Trump 63.0 million

2020 vote totals: Biden 81.3 million
Trump 74.2 million

Percentage of voting age population that voted: 2012 - 53.8%; 2016 - 54.8%; 2020 - 62.0%. (The 2020 figure was the highest since 1964)

Biden's bump in votes was largely a direct result of the effort in many states (including Georgia) to facilitate mail-in voting during the pandemic, as well as public reaction, pro and con, to Trump's first term. Funny how you don't claim there was anything fraudulent about Trump receiving 11 million more votes in 2020 despite a lot of people souring on his presidency during those four years.

Again, I repeat, since it's obviously too complicated for your limited intellectual capacity, "proof" isn't proof unless and until it's verified. For now, it's just numbers on spreadsheets people like you play with that hasn't impressed a single court. I could come up with "proof" the moon is made of green cheese. I'd have about as much success in impressing the courts as your buddies have.

It's impressed the Georgia State Election Board, and Gov Brian Kemp (before politics raised its ugly head). My limited intellectual capacity has allowed me to independently verify many of the documented examples that the GANerds have found. It also allows me not to underestimate the power of the deep state to influence the Justice System. That was brilliantly on display in the person of Ed Lindsey, who stayed on the GA SEB specifically to undermine and to prevent any accountability for the findings of the Rossi investigation. It also allows me to identify thousands of illegal and invalid registrations on the GA Voter roll that should not be on it. I may have limited intellectual capacity, but you have self-imposed boundaries to yours. A condition which is widespread.

[silverscreenselect]

It also allows me to identify thousands of illegal and invalid registrations on the GA Voter roll that should not be on it.

People like you and the GA Nerds have challenged thousands of registrations that were supposedly illegal in various counties already and the vast majority of them were rejected. Of course, all those individual county election boards were part of the Deep State as well.

Election officials largely reject voter eligibility challenges under Georgia’s new election law

And if the election board does uphold an individual challenge, that voter can still cast a provisional ballot showing proof of residence, as many do, rather than show up at an election board hearing.

By the way, when are you going to file challenges against these thousands of illegal registrations? (You can challenge any registration in DeKalb County you think is invalid.) That might be entertaining enough to drive to Decatur to watch.

[flockofseagulls104]

It also allows me to identify thousands of illegal and invalid registrations on the GA Voter roll that should not be on it.

People like you and the GA Nerds have challenged thousands of registrations that were supposedly illegal in various counties already and the vast majority of them were rejected. Of course, all those individual county election boards were part of the Deep State as well.

Election officials largely reject voter eligibility challenges under Georgia’s new election law

And if the election board does uphold an individual challenge, that voter can still cast a provisional ballot showing proof of residence, as many do, rather than show up at an election board hearing.

By the way, when are you going to file challenges against these thousands of illegal registrations? (You can challenge any registration in DeKalb County you think is invalid.) That might be entertaining enough to drive to Decatur to watch.

Every time we do, the board rejects them 3-2, just like they do in your county. Do you know that Elias's lawfare group has sent individual letters to all election board members threatening them with lawsuits if they don't certify elections? No, of course you don't. They also got letters telling them to block citizen challenges with the same veiled threats. Your party WANTS bloated voter rolls. They use them to cast illegal votes. My "spreadsheets" prove that. So does the GANerds research.

I'm tired of this. I know and have proof of election fraud. You have no argument to refute the truth, only pronouncements of people who are conflicted and are provably corrupt or ad hominem attacks. If you produce evidence showing that any of the documented proof I have presented on this bored is false, show it. Or are 'spreadsheets' too complicated for you to understand? Until then, keep calling me names and quoting from your biased and corrupt sources. I know the truth.

[flockofseagulls104]

Venezuela's reaction to Maduro's steal.

[flockofseagulls104]

Here's some more evidence and testimony for you to ignore, trollboy. What epithet will you throw at me this time? You will give that more thought than you will the evidence in the videos.

[silverscreenselect]

Here's some more evidence and testimony for you to ignore, trollboy. What epithet will you throw at me this time? You will give that more thought than you will the evidence in the videos.

You've got four random minutes of testimony and documents that your witnesses say prove election fraud. What you don't have is any finding from the State Elections Board that reviewed those four minutes and all the other evidence that may have been presented confirming there was election fraud. So, in other words, you haven't proved your case before yet another tribunal whose responsibility it is to evaluate all the evidence. Check back with me when you do prove your case before any tribunal.

[kroxquo]

Here's some more evidence and testimony for you to ignore, trollboy. What epithet will you throw at me this time? You will give that more thought than you will the evidence in the videos.

You've got four random minutes of testimony and documents that your witnesses say prove election fraud. What you don't have is any finding from the State Elections Board that reviewed those four minutes and all the other evidence that may have been presented confirming there was election fraud. So, in other words, you haven't proved your case before yet another tribunal whose responsibility it is to evaluate all the evidence. Check back with me when you do prove your case before any tribunal.

The thing is, when someone presents their evidence before an Election Board, that Board will inevitably rule against the evidence because they are are the ones who gave the marching orders to all the poll workers as to what should be done. This is of course is after the Election Board has received their instructions from the powers that be to establish how the election should conclude. Of course the powers that be must also manipulate the media to concoct the narrative that they want, work with the tech companies who manufacture voting machines, and organize tens of thousands of people from the uniparty to all hold hands in solidarity and then swear them to an oath of secrecy that is apparently unbreakable. It's just that plain and simple. Can't you see that?

[flockofseagulls104]

Here's some more evidence and testimony for you to ignore, trollboy. What epithet will you throw at me this time? You will give that more thought than you will the evidence in the videos.

You've got four random minutes of testimony and documents that your witnesses say prove election fraud. What you don't have is any finding from the State Elections Board that reviewed those four minutes and all the other evidence that may have been presented confirming there was election fraud. So, in other words, you haven't proved your case before yet another tribunal whose responsibility it is to evaluate all the evidence. Check back with me when you do prove your case before any tribunal.

The thing is, when someone presents their evidence before an Election Board, that Board will inevitably rule against the evidence because they are are the ones who gave the marching orders to all the poll workers as to what should be done. This is of course is after the Election Board has received their instructions from the powers that be to establish how the election should conclude. Of course the powers that be must also manipulate the media to concoct the narrative that they want, work with the tech companies who manufacture voting machines, and organize tens of thousands of people from the uniparty to all hold hands in solidarity and then swear them to an oath of secrecy that is apparently unbreakable. It's just that plain and simple. Can't you see that?

Yeah, it would be impossible to get thousands of journalists all at once to start calling the republican candidates 'weird'. But they have. How is it that every 'news' report robotically includes a phrase that categorically states that any suggestion the 2020 election might not be squeaky clean is DEBUNKED, BASELESS, PERPETUATED BY "ELECTION DENIERS" etc, etc etc. How have every one of these journalists come to this conclusion individually? Has every one of them examined the evidence for themselves, examined and counted every ballot themselves? How do they all have the same anti-journalistic narrative without any objectivity or skeptical curiosity using the same language? How do they explain this? Or the countless other examples of intentional fraud? They don't even try. They ignore it. Or sweep it under the rug. Just like the 'tribunals' are doing.

Yes, krox. The media is being controlled. Can't be done? Look at what's happening in Venezuela. Look what happened in Brazil. Tell me it can't happen here. Your willful blindness is how it can happen. Open your eyes.

Here's another example, krox. I just did it. I go to Google, click the 'news' tab and type in donald trump. Why do I get news for harris -donald trump? I type in kamala harris, and I get no mention of trump. Why is this krox? An algorithmic error? This has been going on forever, krox. It's a subliminal thing and it has an effect. Open your eyes. If we don't get more people with open eyes, we will become Venezuela.

[flockofseagulls104]

Coming soon to America. Some of it is already happening in rehearsal to see if it will work. For many of you here, you're giving them encouraging feedback. Yes, they can prosecute, bankrupt and jail their opponents. Sure, they can claim any election result they want, and you will buy it. Yeah, they can riot, loot, vandalize and kill with no consequences, but one false move from their opponents brings out the DOJ, FBI and whatever else they can muster. Indefinite prison time for those chosen.

I find it interesting that Venezuela apparently doesn't need trollboy's advice. Maduro has the same skills as trollboy.

Maduro said he warned the members of the opposition were criminals.

“I have powers, I see beyond,” Maduro said adding, “I see someone’s eyes and I know everything they are thinking.”

As is stated in my new avatar, none of us knows what truth is anymore. I saw this, but I cannot verify what it says it is. But it seems to fit what is being reported from what might be reliable sources in Venezuela. Make your own judgement. And then extrapolate what's going on here.

My opinion is that no matter what happens in November, we will see mass demonstrations by one side or another. And it's mainly because one side refuses to take election security seriously. Let's pray they don't turn violent.

[flockofseagulls104]

I agree with something biden's puppets have done!

Now, what will we do about it?

At least Maduro and Musk may not have to have a cage match.



It would be nice if TPTB here in America paid as much attention to election transparency in our own country as they do for Venezuela's election.

I find it an especially ironic sentence to include:

Maduro and his representatives threats to arrest opposition leaders, including Edmundo Gonzalez and Maria Corina Machado, are an undemocratic attempt to repress political participation and retain power.

[flockofseagulls104]

Brazilian judge decides to ban twitter.

It's coming here, folks.

[Weyoun]

From my understanding, nearly 70% of Venezuelan voted for the opposition.

So no, that will never happen here, because Trump has never gotten a majority.