Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
Spock
Posts: 4734
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:01 pm

Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape

#1 Post by Spock » Sat Aug 12, 2023 11:52 am

Solar Panels marching to the horizon with no life in sight.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... ie-dust-a/

Spock
Posts: 4734
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:01 pm

Re: Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape

#2 Post by Spock » Mon Aug 14, 2023 9:28 am

In case anybody doesn't get why I did this.

In a very tough competition, Kroxquo noses out everybody else here in posting sanctimoniously from a position of moral superiority.

And solar panels marching to the horizon with no life in sight is something that is the real-world result of positions that Kroxquo has long sanctimoniously advocated for here and it is certainly the real-world result of what he votes for.

User avatar
Weyoun
Posts: 3094
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape

#3 Post by Weyoun » Mon Aug 14, 2023 9:51 am

I like how Frank is “let’s be more civil,” and you are like “nah.”

Anyway, just because you can find an example of a state doing something stupid doesn’t mean that solar panels themselves are bad. Arizona might benefit from them, for example. Do you think Arizona will benefit from them or are you just going to point out the stupid example and extrapolate that all examples must be stupid?

Using that logic, can I also extrapolate that, because this post by you was stupid and ad hominem, all of your posts must be?

Anyway, I think there should be more solar panels where they are practical - I looked into for my home and the tree coverage in the area made them impractical, you will be relieved to know.

User avatar
mrkelley23
Posts: 6492
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: Somewhere between Bureaucracy and Despair

Re: Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape

#4 Post by mrkelley23 » Mon Aug 14, 2023 4:31 pm

Not a subscriber to the that bastion of responsible journalism, the Washington Times, so I can't read the article.

If your point is, "look at all these solar panels, placed in a place where no one lives (the brief glimpse I got before multiple popups did their thing said Mona, Utah)," can you explain your reasoning to me?

Energy is portable. NIMBY syndrome is a thing.

If I misread your point, I apologize.

As for sanctimoniousness, well, ... the good book says something about motes and beams, I believe.
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled. -- Richard Feynman

Spock
Posts: 4734
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:01 pm

Re: Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape

#5 Post by Spock » Tue Aug 15, 2023 8:11 am

BTW-I am not a subscriber to the Wash times-but I could still see the picture.

I am a long-time member of the American Battlefield Trust (formerly the Civil War Battlefield Trust).

As one might imagine, Virginia is Ground-Zero for battlefield preservation efforts.

The red-hot danger to a battlefield at this moment is a large proposed data center-But, a long-term cancer is industrial scale solar.

as the recent issue notes ->>>>the so-called "environmentalists" in Virginia have mandated that all electricity be "renewable" by 2050."<<< My words and air quotes-not theirs.

Thus scores of industrial-scale solar complexes each chewing up hundreds of acres of land are under consideration across Virginia.

Tens of thousands of acres (maybe more) of currently open land in rural Virginia will be converted to solar farms (with no life in sight) to make liberal urbanites feel like they are "environmentalists."

Biological life means nothing to them-they just want the "Feels"."

The funny part is that as solar panels only last about 25 to 30 years-any put in now will have to be replaced by the 2050 deadline.

User avatar
Estonut
Evil Genius
Posts: 10495
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Garden Grove, CA

Re: Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape

#6 Post by Estonut » Tue Aug 15, 2023 9:18 am

Weyoun wrote:
Mon Aug 14, 2023 9:51 am
I like how Frank is “let’s be more civil,” and you are like “nah.”
Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape
by Spock » Sat Aug 12, 2023 9:52 am

A new rule I'd like to see
by franktangredi » Sun Aug 13, 2023 8:46 am
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx

User avatar
franktangredi
Posts: 6649
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:34 pm

Re: Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape

#7 Post by franktangredi » Tue Aug 15, 2023 9:26 am

Estonut wrote:
Tue Aug 15, 2023 9:18 am
Weyoun wrote:
Mon Aug 14, 2023 9:51 am
I like how Frank is “let’s be more civil,” and you are like “nah.”
Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape
by Spock » Sat Aug 12, 2023 9:52 am

A new rule I'd like to see
by franktangredi » Sun Aug 13, 2023 8:46 am
To be fair, Spock's post preceded mine. And kind of inspired it.

User avatar
Weyoun
Posts: 3094
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape

#8 Post by Weyoun » Tue Aug 15, 2023 11:31 am

Estonut wrote:
Tue Aug 15, 2023 9:18 am
Weyoun wrote:
Mon Aug 14, 2023 9:51 am
I like how Frank is “let’s be more civil,” and you are like “nah.”
Kroxquo's Vision pf a Beautiful Landscape
by Spock » Sat Aug 12, 2023 9:52 am

A new rule I'd like to see
by franktangredi » Sun Aug 13, 2023 8:46 am
His second post in the thread followed Frank’s new thread.

Post Reply