House Republicans and sexual perversion

[Weyoun]

So what’s the deal with that?

I know these folks are some of the worst of the worst. They say all sorts of stupid and crazy things and they get their primary base riled up, and then cake walk to an election because of all the redistricting has left them without legitimate opposition.

That’s a given. But you would be expecting in that situation just a bunch of stupid or crazy folks, not real perverts.

But right now, we don’t have a Speaker of the House because a pervert, Matt Gaetz, is trying to push as leader Jim Jordan.

Jim Jordan turned a blind eye to male-on-male rape at Ohio State’s wrestling program.

That would actually be a step up. If you remember, Dennis Hastert, a former wrestling coach and long-time Speaker, himself buggered young high school boys.

I think folks dismissed that as The Swamp protecting its own, but Jordan and Gaetz are known anti-Swampers.

Is the political far right on this country being misled by perverts trying to cover up their proclivities? That would be ironic, given the fake Pizzagate scandal, the fake accusations that Justice Brown Jackson protected child porn, and the fake claim that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is in part trying to stop sex trafficking.

Once the Republicans get their act together, I just hope they settle on a NON-PERVERT leader.

[Pastor Fireball]

What did you expect from a party whose former (and de facto current) leader once bragged about grabbing women by the pussy and frequently fantasized about screwing his oldest daughter?

[Beebs52]

Why can't you just rejoice in the chaos rather than ascribe perversion to most of the other normal peeps?

[BackInTex]

Why can't you just rejoice in the chaos rather than ascribe perversion to most of the other normal peeps?

Because that's what perverts do.

[tlynn78]

Why can't you just rejoice in the chaos rather than ascribe perversion to most of the other normal peeps?

Because that's what perverts do.

Precisely. Poor souls.

[Weyoun]

Why can't you just rejoice in the chaos rather than ascribe perversion to most of the other normal peeps?

Because that's what perverts do.

Seems like a deflection, especially since you have suggested that a vote for Jm Jordan is a vote of "conscience."

[BackInTex]

Why can't you just rejoice in the chaos rather than ascribe perversion to most of the other normal peeps?

Because that's what perverts do.

Seems like a deflection, especially since you have suggested that a vote for Jm Jordan is a vote of "conscience."

I did not say it was my conscience or one I agree with. Do you know the difference?

[Weyoun]

Because that's what perverts do.

Seems like a deflection, especially since you have suggested that a vote for Jm Jordan is a vote of "conscience."

I did not say it was my conscience or one I agree with. Do you know the difference?

I never said you said those things. Let’s not go back and forth if that’s the best you’ve got.