Spell check

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Message
Author
User avatar
kayrharris
Miss Congeniality
Posts: 11968
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:48 am
Location: Auburn, AL
Contact:

#26 Post by kayrharris » Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:49 pm

I make a statement about SPELLING and I get a lecture on grammar???
I never said I was a grammar expert. I am damn good at spelling. Glad I have you something to laugh about as well as keep you busy today. Maybe I even learned something.
"An investment in knowledge pays the best interest. "
Benjamin Franklin

User avatar
christie1111
11:11
Posts: 11630
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:54 am
Location: CT

#27 Post by christie1111 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:50 pm

As a copyeditor, I've often heard the following admonition: Avoid using "whomever" unless you are 100% certain of the grammar. When in doubt, just use "whoever." See the Chicago Manual of Style (15th ed.), p. 232. So there.
Works for me!

:P
"A bed without a quilt is like the sky without stars"

User avatar
silvercamaro
Dog's Best Friend
Posts: 9608
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am

Re: Spell check

#28 Post by silvercamaro » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:21 pm

TheConfessor wrote:
It's pretty funny that you'll accept only the grammar standards of a fellow Okie.
I was willing to accept the standards of an English teacher whom you may respect.
TheConfessor wrote:
There are hundreds of internet sites that explain this rule, so I don't know which one would be most credible to you, but the Cliffs Notes site is pretty clear and explicit:
http://www.cliffsnotes.com/WileyCDA/Cli ... 28968.html
Pronoun case in subordinate clause

Who, whom, whoever, whomever. In deciding which case of who you should use in a clause, remember this important rule: The case of the pronoun is governed by the role it plays in its own clause, not by its relation to the rest of the sentence. Choosing the right case of pronoun can be especially confusing because the pronoun may appear to have more than one function. Look at the following sentence.

*

They gave the money to whoever presented the winning ticket.

At first, you may be tempted to think whomever rather than whoever should be the pronoun here, on the assumption that it is the object of the preposition to. But in fact the entire clause, not whoever, is the object of the preposition. Refer to the basic rule: The case should be based on the pronoun's role within its own clause. In this clause, whoever is the subject of the verb presented. (A good way to determine the right pronoun case is to forget everything but the clause itself: whoever presented the winning ticket, yes; whomever presented the winning ticket, no.)

The following two sentences show more dramatically how you must focus on the clause rather than the complete sentence in choosing the right pronoun case.

*

We asked whomever we saw for a reaction to the play.
*

We asked whoever called us to call back later.

In each sentence the clause is the direct object of asked. But in the first sentence, whomever is correct because within its clause it is the object of saw, while in the second sentence, whoever is correct because it is the subject of called.
Okay. I will accept the source you cite, as well as JBG's source, as being credible. I hereby offer my sincere apologies for my grievous error. I shall kick myself in the rear, which I can do with finesse because of intensive Irish dance training.

(I also will ponder whether the rules of grammar have been dumbed down throughout the past century. I'm not saying that they have; I'm just pondering. Please also accept my apologies for that semicolon, as I know there are people who hate all use of those, too.)

signed,
Wrong But At Least I Care
Last edited by silvercamaro on Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4884
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

#29 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:22 pm

I love semi-colons
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

Re: Spell check

#30 Post by TheConfessor » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:39 pm

silvercamaro wrote: (I also will ponder whether the rules of grammar have been dumbed down throughout the past century. I'm not saying that they have; I'm just pondering. Please also accept my apologies for that semicolon, as I know there are people who hate all use of those, too.)
Semicolons are fine with me. They just take the place of "and."
silvercamaro wrote: signed,
Wrong But At Least I Care
I love people who care. That's more important than being right.

I could do without the mocking from people who don't.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27033
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

#31 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:44 pm

TheCalvinator24 wrote:I love semi-colons
So do I; they're much better than full colons. Of course there's Fleet to fix those.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

Re: Spell check

#32 Post by peacock2121 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:57 pm

TheConfessor wrote:
silvercamaro wrote: (I also will ponder whether the rules of grammar have been dumbed down throughout the past century. I'm not saying that they have; I'm just pondering. Please also accept my apologies for that semicolon, as I know there are people who hate all use of those, too.)
Semicolons are fine with me. They just take the place of "and."
silvercamaro wrote: signed,
Wrong But At Least I Care
I love people who care. That's more important than being right.

I could do without the mocking from people who don't.
If, by chance, this was directed at me, I was not mocking. I was being amused. I really meant it when I said the thing about us being able to pick nits about almost anything.

I do think I don't care if it is whoever or whomever.

I do care about a whole lot of other things however.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#33 Post by peacock2121 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:59 pm

Oh - and Ed, if it was directed at me, I apologize for my tone and my words that you saw and read as mocking. I never intend to mock you, ever.

I do intend to mock others, but never you.

User avatar
kayrharris
Miss Congeniality
Posts: 11968
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:48 am
Location: Auburn, AL
Contact:

#34 Post by kayrharris » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:03 pm

I thought it was directed at me. I wasn't mocking either. I'm not really the mocking kind. I was dead serious about learning something. I certainly have more than enough to educate me today, that's for sure.
"An investment in knowledge pays the best interest. "
Benjamin Franklin

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#35 Post by peacock2121 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:09 pm

I also wasn't laughing at, I was laughing about.

See.... those two distinctions are something about which I care.

User avatar
BeansCat
Merry Man
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:52 am

#36 Post by BeansCat » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:13 pm

peepuls aer funy

it is eezier to get a gud nap then to wory arselvs abowt spelin nd gramre

but mebe its liek wen we grum arselves nd get al the bugs out, is wye peepuls liek to get the gramre rite

catz thinc gramre is oberraitd ennyway - der aer onle a fuw thigns worf sayign, nd dey shud be sed LOWD - feeds me, pets me, nd cleans mi box. nd den feeds me agian.

srsly
I made you a donut but I eated it

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#37 Post by peacock2121 » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:17 pm

That really made me laugh!

User avatar
AnnieCamaro
Four-Footer
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Rainbow Bridge

#38 Post by AnnieCamaro » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:23 pm

BeansCat wrote:
it is eezier to get a gud nap then to wory arselvs abowt spelin nd gramre

but mebe its liek wen we grum arselves nd get al the bugs out, is wye peepuls liek to get the gramre rite
That is why so many more books have been attributed to dogs than have been written by cats. I mean, I like cats, and I've known cats who have proven to be excellent friends, but it's not like I expect to get e-mails from them or anything.

/:P\
Sou iu koto de.

User avatar
BeansCat
Merry Man
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:52 am

#39 Post by BeansCat » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:38 pm

AnnieCamaro wrote: I mean, I like cats, and I've known cats who have proven to be excellent friends, but it's not like I expect to get e-mails from them or anything.

/:P\

Bee kerful wat u wish fore!
I made you a donut but I eated it

User avatar
AnnieCamaro
Four-Footer
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Rainbow Bridge

#40 Post by AnnieCamaro » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:55 pm

I am so excited. I got mail from a cat. I've never gotten mail from a cat before. I answered it.

/:P\
Sou iu koto de.

Post Reply