Red flag laws
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 16662
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22157
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Red flag laws
Depends on how the law is written. Point me to proposed legislative language and I can give you a more specific answer. --BobBeebs52 wrote:Would these, at some point, allow school or minor records to be evaluated?
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 16662
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: Red flag laws
That's sorta the point. Some states have them. Curious how they could be written.Bob78164 wrote:Depends on how the law is written. Point me to proposed legislative language and I can give you a more specific answer. --BobBeebs52 wrote:Would these, at some point, allow school or minor records to be evaluated?
Well, then
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 16662
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22157
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Red flag laws
Here's a Wikipedia article on the various red flag laws in force in some states. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 16662
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: Red flag laws
Already read that.Bob78164 wrote:Here's a Wikipedia article on the various red flag laws in force in some states. --Bob
Well, then
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 16662
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22157
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Red flag laws
Under California law, the judge has to find that the person to be restrained is an imminent threat of physical harm to himself or herself or to others by reason of possession of a gun. And based on the experience of my former sister-in-law, I'm aware that California also removes guns from the possession of persons subject to domestic violence personal restraining orders, but I think that's a separate provision.Beebs52 wrote:My question was re: minor records, school, etc.
I have no idea what evidence the judge is entitled to consider to make the necessary determination. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- tlynn78
- Posts: 9615
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:31 am
- Location: Montana
Re: Red flag laws
Fixed it for you.Bob78164 wrote:Under California law, the judge has to find that the person to be restrained is an imminent threat of physical harm to himself or herself or to others by reason of possession of a gun. And based on the experience of my former sister-in-law, I'm aware that California also removes guns that they know about and can find from the possession of persons subject to domestic violence personal restraining orders, but I think that's a separate provision.Beebs52 wrote:My question was re: minor records, school, etc.
I have no idea what evidence the judge is entitled to consider to make the necessary determination. --Bob
When reality requires approval, control replaces truth.
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. -Thomas Paine
You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. -Ayn Rand
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. -Thomas Paine
You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. -Ayn Rand
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22157
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Red flag laws
I really don't see what point you're making here. Is it that red flag laws won't be 100% effective, so we shouldn't even try?tlynn78 wrote:Fixed it for you.Bob78164 wrote:Under California law, the judge has to find that the person to be restrained is an imminent threat of physical harm to himself or herself or to others by reason of possession of a gun. And based on the experience of my former sister-in-law, I'm aware that California also removes guns that they know about and can find from the possession of persons subject to domestic violence personal restraining orders, but I think that's a separate provision.Beebs52 wrote:My question was re: minor records, school, etc.
I have no idea what evidence the judge is entitled to consider to make the necessary determination. --Bob
And in the case of a domestic violence restraining order (such as the one my ex-sister-in-law received against the then-husband who had been beating her for years), there's a pretty good chance that the victim will know what guns to look for and where they'll be. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
-
Spock
- Posts: 4860
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:01 pm
Re: Red flag laws
Bob>>>"there's a pretty good chance that the victim will know what guns to look for and where they'll be. --Bob"<<<Bob78164 wrote:I really don't see what point you're making here. Is it that red flag laws won't be 100% effective, so we shouldn't even try?tlynn78 wrote:Fixed it for you.Bob78164 wrote:Under California law, the judge has to find that the person to be restrained is an imminent threat of physical harm to himself or herself or to others by reason of possession of a gun. And based on the experience of my former sister-in-law, I'm aware that California also removes guns that they know about and can find from the possession of persons subject to domestic violence personal restraining orders, but I think that's a separate provision.
I have no idea what evidence the judge is entitled to consider to make the necessary determination. --Bob
And in the case of a domestic violence restraining order (such as the one my ex-sister-in-law received against the then-husband who had been beating her for years), there's a pretty good chance that the victim will know what guns to look for and where they'll be. --Bob
Not disagreeing politically, and you may view this as sexist or whatever, but odds are that a wife (especially a beaten wife) will have no idea what specific guns her husband has-beyond the knowledge that he has some guns. She may have more knowledge of where they are, but even that might be iffy.
A joke among firearms people is that as soon as you can get your wife to say something like "My husband has a lot of guns" you are home free-because then she won't know if you add another one to the mix.
Another joke is that if you put 2 guns in a closet-they breed like rabbits and you end up with a lot more than 2. So it is unlikely that she would know what specific guns he might have.
Hell, a lot of firearms people probably couldn't tell you exactly how many guns they have and of what model. They just tend to accumulate over the years.