Speaker of the House fun
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 15172
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Speaker of the House fun
I think it'll be boring. I think the Democrats will end up with a big enough majority (it looks like they're on track to end up with 230 or 231 seats after all the uncalled races are decided) that Rep. Pelosi will be able to let all of the Democrats who campaigned saying that they won't support her for Speaker keep their promises. And in addition to being a prodigious fundraiser, she's also an extremely accomplished tactician on the House floor, which means she gets stuff done. I think most of her caucus knows and appreciates that. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 15172
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: Speaker of the House fun
You don't think upstarts will have a say?Bob78164 wrote:I think it'll be boring. I think the Democrats will end up with a big enough majority (it looks like they're on track to end up with 230 or 231 seats after all the uncalled races are decided) that Rep. Pelosi will be able to let all of the Democrats who campaigned saying that they won't support her for Speaker keep their promises. And in addition to being a prodigious fundraiser, she's also an extremely accomplished tactician on the House floor, which means she gets stuff done. I think most of her caucus knows and appreciates that. --Bob
Well, then
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Speaker of the House fun
It's not clear that anyone else in the caucus will run against her, but someone probably will. The upstarts and new members will have a say, but they'll get outvoted in the caucus. After that, Rep. Pelosi is smart enough to give as many Democrats as she can afford a pass to vote for someone else for Speaker on the floor. But at the end of the day, at least 218 Democrats will vote for the Democratic nominee for Speaker and that nominee will, in all likelihood, be the once and future Speaker, Nancy Pelosi. --BobBeebs52 wrote:You don't think upstarts will have a say?Bob78164 wrote:I think it'll be boring. I think the Democrats will end up with a big enough majority (it looks like they're on track to end up with 230 or 231 seats after all the uncalled races are decided) that Rep. Pelosi will be able to let all of the Democrats who campaigned saying that they won't support her for Speaker keep their promises. And in addition to being a prodigious fundraiser, she's also an extremely accomplished tactician on the House floor, which means she gets stuff done. I think most of her caucus knows and appreciates that. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Speaker of the House fun
I need to amend this a bit. It turns out that the successful candidate needs a majority of votes cast, not a majority of the entire House. So as long as Democrats end up with at least 229 seats (leaving Republicans with 206), all 21 Democrats who said they wouldn't vote for Pelosi (some of whom only said they wouldn't vote for her for party leader) could vote "present" on the floor and she'd still be elected Speaker. So she'll release as many votes as she can afford, but at the end of the day, enough Democrats will vote for the Democratic nominee for Speaker, who I expect will be Rep. Pelosi, to give her a majority of votes cast, which might be fewer than 218. --BobBob78164 wrote:It's not clear that anyone else in the caucus will run against her, but someone probably will. The upstarts and new members will have a say, but they'll get outvoted in the caucus. After that, Rep. Pelosi is smart enough to give as many Democrats as she can afford a pass to vote for someone else for Speaker on the floor. But at the end of the day, at least 218 Democrats will vote for the Democratic nominee for Speaker and that nominee will, in all likelihood, be the once and future Speaker, Nancy Pelosi. --BobBeebs52 wrote:You don't think upstarts will have a say?Bob78164 wrote:I think it'll be boring. I think the Democrats will end up with a big enough majority (it looks like they're on track to end up with 230 or 231 seats after all the uncalled races are decided) that Rep. Pelosi will be able to let all of the Democrats who campaigned saying that they won't support her for Speaker keep their promises. And in addition to being a prodigious fundraiser, she's also an extremely accomplished tactician on the House floor, which means she gets stuff done. I think most of her caucus knows and appreciates that. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- bazodee
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:23 am
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Re: Speaker of the House fun
I expect there may be a deal struck where Pelosi is elected Speaker with the promise she'll step down after one term. (even if the Democrats still hold the House majority in 2020)Bob78164 wrote:I need to amend this a bit. It turns out that the successful candidate needs a majority of votes cast, not a majority of the entire House. So as long as Democrats end up with at least 229 seats (leaving Republicans with 206), all 21 Democrats who said they wouldn't vote for Pelosi (some of whom only said they wouldn't vote for her for party leader) could vote "present" on the floor and she'd still be elected Speaker. So she'll release as many votes as she can afford, but at the end of the day, enough Democrats will vote for the Democratic nominee for Speaker, who I expect will be Rep. Pelosi, to give her a majority of votes cast, which might be fewer than 218. --BobBob78164 wrote:It's not clear that anyone else in the caucus will run against her, but someone probably will. The upstarts and new members will have a say, but they'll get outvoted in the caucus. After that, Rep. Pelosi is smart enough to give as many Democrats as she can afford a pass to vote for someone else for Speaker on the floor. But at the end of the day, at least 218 Democrats will vote for the Democratic nominee for Speaker and that nominee will, in all likelihood, be the once and future Speaker, Nancy Pelosi. --BobBeebs52 wrote:
You don't think upstarts will have a say?
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Speaker of the House fun
She's pretty much already said that's what she plans. --Bobbazodee wrote:I expect there may be a deal struck where Pelosi is elected Speaker with the promise she'll step down after one term. (even if the Democrats still hold the House majority in 2020)Bob78164 wrote:I need to amend this a bit. It turns out that the successful candidate needs a majority of votes cast, not a majority of the entire House. So as long as Democrats end up with at least 229 seats (leaving Republicans with 206), all 21 Democrats who said they wouldn't vote for Pelosi (some of whom only said they wouldn't vote for her for party leader) could vote "present" on the floor and she'd still be elected Speaker. So she'll release as many votes as she can afford, but at the end of the day, enough Democrats will vote for the Democratic nominee for Speaker, who I expect will be Rep. Pelosi, to give her a majority of votes cast, which might be fewer than 218. --BobBob78164 wrote:It's not clear that anyone else in the caucus will run against her, but someone probably will. The upstarts and new members will have a say, but they'll get outvoted in the caucus. After that, Rep. Pelosi is smart enough to give as many Democrats as she can afford a pass to vote for someone else for Speaker on the floor. But at the end of the day, at least 218 Democrats will vote for the Democratic nominee for Speaker and that nominee will, in all likelihood, be the once and future Speaker, Nancy Pelosi. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- earendel
- Posts: 13610
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
- Location: mired in the bureaucracy
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Frankly I wish she'd step down now. Give a younger generation a chance.Bob78164 wrote:She's pretty much already said that's what she plans. --Bobbazodee wrote:I expect there may be a deal struck where Pelosi is elected Speaker with the promise she'll step down after one term. (even if the Democrats still hold the House majority in 2020)Bob78164 wrote:I need to amend this a bit. It turns out that the successful candidate needs a majority of votes cast, not a majority of the entire House. So as long as Democrats end up with at least 229 seats (leaving Republicans with 206), all 21 Democrats who said they wouldn't vote for Pelosi (some of whom only said they wouldn't vote for her for party leader) could vote "present" on the floor and she'd still be elected Speaker. So she'll release as many votes as she can afford, but at the end of the day, enough Democrats will vote for the Democratic nominee for Speaker, who I expect will be Rep. Pelosi, to give her a majority of votes cast, which might be fewer than 218. --Bob
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."
- Pastor Fireball
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 4:48 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Contact:
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Marcia Fudge has made some waves over the past couple of days about challenging for the speakership. If I were a Democratic congresscritter, I would vote for Fudge... but I'm a little biased with my vote because she's from my home state.earendel wrote:Frankly I wish she'd step down now. Give a younger generation a chance.Bob78164 wrote:She's pretty much already said that's what she plans. --Bobbazodee wrote:
I expect there may be a deal struck where Pelosi is elected Speaker with the promise she'll step down after one term. (even if the Democrats still hold the House majority in 2020)
"[Drumpf's] name alone creates division and anger, whose words inspire dissension and hatred, and can't possibly 'Make America Great Again.'" --Kobe Bryant (1978-2020)
"In times of crisis, the wise build bridges. The foolish build barriers." --Chadwick Boseman (1976-2020)
"In times of crisis, the wise build bridges. The foolish build barriers." --Chadwick Boseman (1976-2020)
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Taking over the House after a decade is not something you want to turn over to someone with no experience, especially when you'll have to deal with a combative Donald Trump every day.earendel wrote: Frankly I wish she'd step down now. Give a younger generation a chance.
I don't think a lot of people realize how important Pelosi was to the Democratic efforts to regain the House. She got portrayed as the villain in every Republican commercial (_____ is a Nancy Pelosi puppet wanting to bring the liberal agenda to your district), but she was largely responsible for crafting the Democratic pitch to emphasize health care and the issues the Democrats are strongest on, rather than just make the entire election about Trump. The voters already knew about Trump so the Democrats didn't need to remind them. Instead, Pelosi made sure that the voters had something to vote for, rather than merely someone to vote against. Without this type of messaging, it's questionable if the Democrats retake the House.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- BackInTex
- Posts: 12890
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
Re: Speaker of the House fun
The Dems took the house as a result of the anti-Trump mania. The Dems have nothing to campaign on other than socialism and welfare. I guess that could also be part of the reasons as this country has become more of a "do it for me" land rather than "no thanks I'll do it for myself" type of mentality.silverscreenselect wrote:Taking over the House after a decade is not something you want to turn over to someone with no experience, especially when you'll have to deal with a combative Donald Trump every day.earendel wrote: Frankly I wish she'd step down now. Give a younger generation a chance.
I don't think a lot of people realize how important Pelosi was to the Democratic efforts to regain the House. She got portrayed as the villain in every Republican commercial (_____ is a Nancy Pelosi puppet wanting to bring the liberal agenda to your district), but she was largely responsible for crafting the Democratic pitch to emphasize health care and the issues the Democrats are strongest on, rather than just make the entire election about Trump. The voters already knew about Trump so the Democrats didn't need to remind them. Instead, Pelosi made sure that the voters had something to vote for, rather than merely someone to vote against. Without this type of messaging, it's questionable if the Democrats retake the House.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Speaker of the House fun
You just go ahead and continue blaming the voters instead of the message Republicans were trying to sell. As the California Republican Party has realized too late, that's a pretty good recipe for electoral oblivion. Think about it. The Governor-elect of Kansas, of all places, is a Democrat.BackInTex wrote:The Dems took the house as a result of the anti-Trump mania. The Dems have nothing to campaign on other than socialism and welfare. I guess that could also be part of the reasons as this country has become more of a "do it for me" land rather than "no thanks I'll do it for myself" type of mentality.silverscreenselect wrote:Taking over the House after a decade is not something you want to turn over to someone with no experience, especially when you'll have to deal with a combative Donald Trump every day.earendel wrote: Frankly I wish she'd step down now. Give a younger generation a chance.
I don't think a lot of people realize how important Pelosi was to the Democratic efforts to regain the House. She got portrayed as the villain in every Republican commercial (_____ is a Nancy Pelosi puppet wanting to bring the liberal agenda to your district), but she was largely responsible for crafting the Democratic pitch to emphasize health care and the issues the Democrats are strongest on, rather than just make the entire election about Trump. The voters already knew about Trump so the Democrats didn't need to remind them. Instead, Pelosi made sure that the voters had something to vote for, rather than merely someone to vote against. Without this type of messaging, it's questionable if the Democrats retake the House.
When Republicans start accepting the message of politicians like Larry Hogan, Charlie Baker, and Arnold Schwartzenegger, they'll have a chance to reverse their slide. But if they continue to try to sell the mantra of more and more tax cuts and more and more fear-mongering against immigrants, I expect fresh blood like Rep.-elect Lizzie Pannill Fletcher to have a nice long career. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26556
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Why do the parts of the country with the highest percentage of people on welfare have a majority of registered Republicans?BackInTex wrote:The Dems took the house as a result of the anti-Trump mania. The Dems have nothing to campaign on other than socialism and welfare. I guess that could also be part of the reasons as this country has become more of a "do it for me" land rather than "no thanks I'll do it for myself" type of mentality.silverscreenselect wrote:Taking over the House after a decade is not something you want to turn over to someone with no experience, especially when you'll have to deal with a combative Donald Trump every day.earendel wrote: Frankly I wish she'd step down now. Give a younger generation a chance.
I don't think a lot of people realize how important Pelosi was to the Democratic efforts to regain the House. She got portrayed as the villain in every Republican commercial (_____ is a Nancy Pelosi puppet wanting to bring the liberal agenda to your district), but she was largely responsible for crafting the Democratic pitch to emphasize health care and the issues the Democrats are strongest on, rather than just make the entire election about Trump. The voters already knew about Trump so the Democrats didn't need to remind them. Instead, Pelosi made sure that the voters had something to vote for, rather than merely someone to vote against. Without this type of messaging, it's questionable if the Democrats retake the House.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Because it's all the fault of illegal immigrants and Islamic terrorists.Bob Juch wrote:
Why do the parts of the country with the highest percentage of people on welfare have a majority of registered Republicans?
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- BackInTex
- Posts: 12890
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Where is the support for your assertion?Bob Juch wrote:Why do the parts of the country with the highest percentage of people on welfare have a majority of registered Republicans?BackInTex wrote:The Dems took the house as a result of the anti-Trump mania. The Dems have nothing to campaign on other than socialism and welfare. I guess that could also be part of the reasons as this country has become more of a "do it for me" land rather than "no thanks I'll do it for myself" type of mentality.silverscreenselect wrote:
Taking over the House after a decade is not something you want to turn over to someone with no experience, especially when you'll have to deal with a combative Donald Trump every day.
I don't think a lot of people realize how important Pelosi was to the Democratic efforts to regain the House. She got portrayed as the villain in every Republican commercial (_____ is a Nancy Pelosi puppet wanting to bring the liberal agenda to your district), but she was largely responsible for crafting the Democratic pitch to emphasize health care and the issues the Democrats are strongest on, rather than just make the entire election about Trump. The voters already knew about Trump so the Democrats didn't need to remind them. Instead, Pelosi made sure that the voters had something to vote for, rather than merely someone to vote against. Without this type of messaging, it's questionable if the Democrats retake the House.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 15172
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Here's welfare spendingBackInTex wrote:Where is the support for your assertion?Bob Juch wrote:Why do the parts of the country with the highest percentage of people on welfare have a majority of registered Republicans?BackInTex wrote:
The Dems took the house as a result of the anti-Trump mania. The Dems have nothing to campaign on other than socialism and welfare. I guess that could also be part of the reasons as this country has become more of a "do it for me" land rather than "no thanks I'll do it for myself" type of mentality.
https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/co ... g_2017b40a
Well, then
- BackInTex
- Posts: 12890
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Need it by county.Beebs52 wrote:Here's welfare spendingBackInTex wrote:Where is the support for your assertion?Bob Juch wrote: Why do the parts of the country with the highest percentage of people on welfare have a majority of registered Republicans?
https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/co ... g_2017b40a
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 15172
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Note the 3 highest. Watching football. County iis beyond me nowBackInTex wrote:Need it by county.Beebs52 wrote:Here's welfare spendingBackInTex wrote:
Where is the support for your assertion?
https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/co ... g_2017b40a
Well, then
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 15172
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Oh, since Texas doesn't have party aff8liation as voter reg requirement, well, you know.
Well, then
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Note the bottom of the table. All of the red numbers are "guesstimated." --BobBeebs52 wrote:Note the 3 highest. Watching football. County iis beyond me nowBackInTex wrote:Need it by county.
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 15172
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 15172
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: Speaker of the House fun
Since I'm sure bobs ×2 don't watch football, do your own f!@#ing research since ya made the statements. Buh by.
Well, then