Unless this idiot is making shit up, like you.Bob Juch wrote:Oh sorry, I guess it's only 20 lies.Estonut wrote:FINALLY! The alleged lies to the Senate Judiciary Committee. The first 11 "lies" listed by the writer don't even fall under his/her premise.The author of the linked article wrote:Kavanaugh: 31 Lies and Counting
Jeff Flake told 60 Minutes that Kavanaugh would not be confirmed if the FBI probe showed that he lied to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
LIE 1
In 2004, Kavanaugh claimed
LIE 2
In 2006, Kavanaugh denied
LIE 3
In 2006, Kavanaugh denied
LIE 4
In 2004, Kavanaugh denied
LIE 5
In a 2004 written questionnaire, Kavanaugh wrote
LIE 6
In 2006, Kavanaugh again denied knowing
LIE 7
In 2018, Kavanaugh denied knowing
LIE 8
During his confirmation hearing in 2006, Kavanaugh said
LIE 9
During Kavanaugh’s 2006 confirmation hearing
LIE 10
Kavanaugh claimed that his previous testimony
LIE 11
During his 2006 confirmation hearing for his D.C. Circuit Court nomination
LIE 12
Regarding the current allegation of sexual assault
Kavanaugh
- Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
Re: Kavanaugh
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx
Groucho Marx
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Kavanaugh
I'm sure all those drinks have helped your memory.Estonut wrote: If 4 people getting together to have a few drinks constitutes a party, then I've been to thousands.
But then again, the question isn't what your memory is or mine. It's Dr. Ford and Kavanaugh's memory. And contrary to your and Flock's assertions, expert testimony is admissible in cases like this to help fact finders assess the plausibility of various witness's testimony. Here's what one expert witness says:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/ob ... t-victims/
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Kavanaugh
If a potential client who wants me to represent him or her in a business dispute happens to be a Republican, no problem. I just need to have confidence that the client will be honest with me and in court. In, say, a voting rights case, I'd probably have an issue representing someone who wanted to cut back voting rights, and that person's probably a Republican. --BobBeebs52 wrote:?Bob78164 wrote:Yes, but probably not in connection with a matter with political implications. --BobBeebs52 wrote:Hey lawyersorts, could you represent someone with whom you disagree politically?
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
Re: Kavanaugh
You seem to not remember that I already said, "I remember plenty of high school parties 40+ years later. Especially those where there were incidents or which later were rumored about."silverscreenselect wrote:I'm sure all those drinks have helped your memory.Estonut wrote: If 4 people getting together to have a few drinks constitutes a party, then I've been to thousands.
Again, you seem to forget that I've already said, whatever these expert witnesses might testify CAN happen, it means nothing unless they've examined these 2 people. I'd hope that no psychological expert would testify about the mental state of either of these people without examining them first, especially since both are alive and available.silverscreenselect wrote:But then again, the question isn't what your memory is or mine. It's Dr. Ford and Kavanaugh's memory. And contrary to your and Flock's assertions, expert testimony is admissible in cases like this to help fact finders assess the plausibility of various witness's testimony. Here's what one expert witness says:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/ob ... t-victims/
I'd also like the FBI or the Senate Judiciary Committee to examine her therapist's notes in their entirety. She should not be able to offer parts of them to support her story and then refuse to hand them over. I wonder what she's hiding.
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx
Groucho Marx
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Kavanaugh
Her lawyers offered to turn them over to the FBI (not the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee). They apparently didn't examine her, the notes, or the witnesses she suggested contacting.Estonut wrote:I'd also like the FBI or the Senate Judiciary Committee to examine her therapist's notes in their entirety. She should not be able to offer parts of them to support her story and then refuse to hand them over. I wonder what she's hiding.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 15172
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26555
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Kavanaugh
Justice Stevens dissents. https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/re ... CimtNxpjJ/Beebs52 wrote:https://www.wsj.com/articles/i-am-an-in ... 1538695822
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 15172
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: Kavanaugh
Whatevs.Bob Juch wrote:Justice Stevens dissents. https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/re ... CimtNxpjJ/Beebs52 wrote:https://www.wsj.com/articles/i-am-an-in ... 1538695822
Well, then
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26555
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Kavanaugh
https://www.theladders.com/career-advic ... mmon-thingBeebs52 wrote:Whatevs.Bob Juch wrote:Justice Stevens dissents. https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/re ... CimtNxpjJ/Beebs52 wrote:https://www.wsj.com/articles/i-am-an-in ... 1538695822
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 15172
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: Kavanaugh
Now tbat is priceless. I needed a giggle. Thx.Bob Juch wrote:https://www.theladders.com/career-advic ... mmon-thingBeebs52 wrote:Whatevs.Bob Juch wrote: Justice Stevens dissents. https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/re ... CimtNxpjJ/
Well, then
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26555
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Kavanaugh
100,000 U.S. Christian Churches Demand Withdrawal of Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Nomination
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/100-000- ... 19723.html
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/100-000- ... 19723.html
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26555
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Kavanaugh
Undecided Dem Sen Manchin tells reporters he has been ‘thrown out’ of the room where he’d been reading the only copy of the FBI report because it was the ‘Republicans’ turn’ to read it,” tweeted McClatchy reporter Emma Dumain. “He says he has to come back tomorrow to finish, then will make a decision on Kavanaugh.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Kavanaugh
The Denver Post is reporting that Cory Gardner is saying he hasn't made up his mind to vote for Kavanaugh. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- SportsFan68
- No Scritches!!!
- Posts: 21113
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
- Location: God's Country
Re: Kavanaugh
A bunch of us have been working very hard on this, including telephoning and demonstrating outside his local office last night and tonight. We'll probably demonstrate Friday night also.Bob78164 wrote:The Denver Post is reporting that Cory Gardner is saying he hasn't made up his mind to vote for Kavanaugh. --Bob
However, it will astonish me if he votes no. He has been a most excellent little minion for Trump.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller
- flockofseagulls104
- Posts: 7993
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Kavanaugh
I don't think you would do it. But are any of your bunch going to do your civic duty and get in his face and yell at him and his family when he's at a restaurant? Maybe follow him home and throw tomatoes at his house?SportsFan68 wrote:A bunch of us have been working very hard on this, including telephoning and demonstrating outside his local office last night and tonight. We'll probably demonstrate Friday night also.Bob78164 wrote:The Denver Post is reporting that Cory Gardner is saying he hasn't made up his mind to vote for Kavanaugh. --Bob
However, it will astonish me if he votes no. He has been a most excellent little minion for Trump.
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton... gullible idiot
- Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
Re: Kavanaugh
Impressive. Did they get signatures from all 45 million churchgoers?Bob Juch wrote:100,000 U.S. Christian Churches Demand Withdrawal of Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Nomination
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/100-000- ... 19723.html
Remember when your side said it would have been impossible for Kavanaugh's representatives to collect, what, 65 signatures in a day? Two people collecting less than 3 supporters per hour? No way!
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx
Groucho Marx
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Kavanaugh
No, the article said that the National Council of Churches, which represents 100,000 churches came out against Kavanaugh. And it's quite possible that the governing board of the Council would come out with such a proclamation. The more people go beyond sticking their heads in the sand like you and Flock and examining what has really transpired in the last two weeks, the more they realize there are big problems with Judge Kavanaugh's overall temperament.Estonut wrote:Impressive. Did they get signatures from all 45 million churchgoers?
I have yet to hear of one person who said "I was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh when this whole affair started, but I'm for him now."
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
Re: Kavanaugh
That's my point, I just used the bigger number. NCC represents 100,000 churches in a partnership of 38 Christian faith groups. To make the council effective, I'd guess they have 38 members running the show. Regardless, there was some portion of their leadership that (may have) chosen to make this statement, if they even did (I don't know anything about "Religious News Service," except that I've never heard of them before). Whatever the number, it is probably less than .1% of the people in those churches. BJ's (misleading, as usual) headline was, "100,000 U.S. Christian Churches Demand Withdrawal of Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Nomination." That just is not true.silverscreenselect wrote:No, the article said that the National Council of Churches, which represents 100,000 churches came out against Kavanaugh. And it's quite possible that the governing board of the Council would come out with such a proclamation.Estonut wrote:Impressive. Did they get signatures from all 45 million churchgoers?
I'm not burying my head in the sand about anything. I am just more open-minded about what I believe.silverscreenselect wrote:The more people go beyond sticking their heads in the sand like you and Flock and examining what has really transpired in the last two weeks, the more they realize there are big problems with Judge Kavanaugh's overall temperament.
No one wants to get screamed at/attacked/protested by your side. You will hear them loud and clear at the elections. Prepare to be shocked again.silverscreenselect wrote:I have yet to hear of one person who said "I was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh when this whole affair started, but I'm for him now."
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx
Groucho Marx
- flockofseagulls104
- Posts: 7993
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Kavanaugh
I have big problems with Kagan's, Sotomayor's and especially Vadar-Ginsberg's 'judicial' temperament when it concerns the Constitution.silverscreenselect wrote:No, the article said that the National Council of Churches, which represents 100,000 churches came out against Kavanaugh. And it's quite possible that the governing board of the Council would come out with such a proclamation. The more people go beyond sticking their heads in the sand like you and Flock and examining what has really transpired in the last two weeks, the more they realize there are big problems with Judge Kavanaugh's overall temperament.Estonut wrote:Impressive. Did they get signatures from all 45 million churchgoers?
I have yet to hear of one person who said "I was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh when this whole affair started, but I'm for him now."
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton... gullible idiot
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Kavanaugh
Making decisions you disagree with has nothing to do with judicial temperament. I haven't heard anyone complain about how Gorsuch has acted.flockofseagulls104 wrote:I have big problems with Kagan's, Sotomayor's and especially Vadar-Ginsberg's 'judicial' temperament when it concerns the Constitution.silverscreenselect wrote:No, the article said that the National Council of Churches, which represents 100,000 churches came out against Kavanaugh. And it's quite possible that the governing board of the Council would come out with such a proclamation. The more people go beyond sticking their heads in the sand like you and Flock and examining what has really transpired in the last two weeks, the more they realize there are big problems with Judge Kavanaugh's overall temperament.Estonut wrote:Impressive. Did they get signatures from all 45 million churchgoers?
I have yet to hear of one person who said "I was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh when this whole affair started, but I'm for him now."
And you avoided my statement. No one has come out and said they opposed Kavanaugh before the latest hearing and investigation and support him now, but plenty of distinguished legal minds have made the opposite statement (including some who publicly endorsed him earlier).
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- flockofseagulls104
- Posts: 7993
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Kavanaugh
I believe Esto answered that question sufficiently. I try and read what people write and advance from that point. As usual, you ignore answers that you don't like. It's like the difference between TV series that have continuity between episodes and those that are just a formula. You (and bob-tel) are a formula of leftist narrative.silverscreenselect wrote:Making decisions you disagree with has nothing to do with judicial temperament. I haven't heard anyone complain about how Gorsuch has acted.flockofseagulls104 wrote:I have big problems with Kagan's, Sotomayor's and especially Vadar-Ginsberg's 'judicial' temperament when it concerns the Constitution.silverscreenselect wrote:
No, the article said that the National Council of Churches, which represents 100,000 churches came out against Kavanaugh. And it's quite possible that the governing board of the Council would come out with such a proclamation. The more people go beyond sticking their heads in the sand like you and Flock and examining what has really transpired in the last two weeks, the more they realize there are big problems with Judge Kavanaugh's overall temperament.
I have yet to hear of one person who said "I was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh when this whole affair started, but I'm for him now."
And you avoided my statement. No one has come out and said they opposed Kavanaugh before the latest hearing and investigation and support him now, but plenty of distinguished legal minds have made the opposite statement (including some who publicly endorsed him earlier).
One thing I have seen that make a lot of sense, that you conveniently ignore, is that what Feinstein, and presumably the dem leadership, have done in their strategy to delay the vote is create 5 new victims, and they don't care. Kavanaugh's family has been put through as much hell as Dr. Ford, only because of what Feinstein did. If she had followed the established process, all could have been resolved, for better or worse, behind the scenes, sparing both Ford and Kavanaugh this disgusting trial through the media. But the priority for the dems trumped everything. And that is in itself disgusting.
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton... gullible idiot
- flockofseagulls104
- Posts: 7993
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Kavanaugh
I think the most concerning thing about this fiasco is the sizable group of people who believe 'This is a job interview. The presumption of innocence does not apply.' This is a totally ignorant and dangerous notion. The presumption of innocence is the very foundation of our legal system. If you do away with it in any situation it threatens the freedom of us all.
In the future, if you oppose someone's nomination, all you have to do is put together a 'committee' to scour for someone who could make a semi-credible charge against that person's integrity that can't be immediately disproven. Leak it to the media and you have accomplished your goal. Even the disgusting Avenatti charge would do.
I look forward to being amused by the ethical lawyer's response to this observation. He's probably sitting by his batphone.
In the future, if you oppose someone's nomination, all you have to do is put together a 'committee' to scour for someone who could make a semi-credible charge against that person's integrity that can't be immediately disproven. Leak it to the media and you have accomplished your goal. Even the disgusting Avenatti charge would do.
I look forward to being amused by the ethical lawyer's response to this observation. He's probably sitting by his batphone.
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton... gullible idiot
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Kavanaugh
This is not about the presumption of innocence. This is about demonstrating fitness for the highest judicial position in our country. The canons of judicial ethics don't merely say that judges should avoid impropriety; they require judges to avoid the appearance of impropriety... in other words something that might be construed as showing partiality or unfitness. That's a burden no one else in our society faces.flockofseagulls104 wrote: This is a totally ignorant and dangerous notion. The presumption of innocence is the very foundation of our legal system.
And even by your own standards, as long as you choose to disbelieve anything a complaining witness says unless there is documentary proof of it, then a lot of people who were rightly committed of sex crimes will get off the hook. Testimony given in court is evidence, the same as DNA samples.
And you're right; that does disqualify a lot of people from being judges, especially Supreme Court justices, as it should.
Kavanaugh has failed that test as demonstrated by the overwhelming number of people in the legal community, who know a lot more than Flock and his buddies at Breitbart about what's the foundation of the system, who have come out against the nomination, even in many cases when they supported it in the first place. I don't know what will happen in the future. I do know that based on the treatment Dr. Ford has received, a lot of women are going to be a lot more reluctant about revealing past assaults.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- flockofseagulls104
- Posts: 7993
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Kavanaugh
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/31/politics ... index.html
flockofseagulls104 wrote:
I have big problems with Kagan's, Sotomayor's and especially Vadar-Ginsberg's 'judicial' temperament when it concerns the Constitution.
silverscreenselect wrote:
Making decisions you disagree with has nothing to do with judicial temperament.
It's ok to be political if you're a democrat justice. right?
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton... gullible idiot
- flockofseagulls104
- Posts: 7993
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Kavanaugh
I got you, babe!who know a lot more than Flock and his buddies at Breitbart
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton... gullible idiot