Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
- flockofseagulls104
- Posts: 7993
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton... gullible idiot
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
As I mentioned earlier, I don’t care whether investigators have political views. That’s inevitable. I do care when investigators allow their political views to affect their decision making.
And it looks like that’s the case with the decision to fire Strzok. My understanding is that the FBI’s professional responsibility unit recommended a suspension but that the Deputy Director, a political appointee, overruled the recommendation. It sounds to me like a reprisal for anti-Donny views.
So there are three questions that need answering. First, what were the grounds for firing Strzok? Second, how has the FBI historically treated similar issues? Third, what process was used to make the decision?
Under the circumstances, a Congessional investigation is obviously appropriate. But the current head of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect the President, and that obviously makes him incapable of doing his job. The only way to fix that problem is to install a different Chair, one who understands the difference between oversight and cheerleading, and that will require a Democratic majority in the House. I’ll take one in the Senate as well. —Bob
And it looks like that’s the case with the decision to fire Strzok. My understanding is that the FBI’s professional responsibility unit recommended a suspension but that the Deputy Director, a political appointee, overruled the recommendation. It sounds to me like a reprisal for anti-Donny views.
So there are three questions that need answering. First, what were the grounds for firing Strzok? Second, how has the FBI historically treated similar issues? Third, what process was used to make the decision?
Under the circumstances, a Congessional investigation is obviously appropriate. But the current head of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect the President, and that obviously makes him incapable of doing his job. The only way to fix that problem is to install a different Chair, one who understands the difference between oversight and cheerleading, and that will require a Democratic majority in the House. I’ll take one in the Senate as well. —Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26554
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
That committee has made a lot of oversights.Bob78164 wrote:As I mentioned earlier, I don’t care whether investigators have political views. That’s inevitable. I do care when investigators allow their political views to affect their decision making.
And it looks like that’s the case with the decision to fire Strzok. My understanding is that the FBI’s professional responsibility unit recommended a suspension but that the Deputy Director, a political appointee, overruled the recommendation. It sounds to me like a reprisal for anti-Donny views.
So there are three questions that need answering. First, what were the grounds for firing Strzok? Second, how has the FBI historically treated similar issues? Third, what process was used to make the decision?
Under the circumstances, a Congressional investigation is obviously appropriate. But the current head of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect the President, and that obviously makes him incapable of doing his job. The only way to fix that problem is to install a different Chair, one who understands the difference between oversight and cheerleading, and that will require a Democratic majority in the House. I’ll take one in the Senate as well. —Bob
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
I'm just waiting on the Republicans in Congress to demand an investigation of those FBI agents that Rudy Giuliani admits fed him information.
Or how about checking the texts and e-mails of every agent investigating Hillary over the years to see signs of anti-Hillary bias.
And waiting. And waiting. And waiting.
Or how about checking the texts and e-mails of every agent investigating Hillary over the years to see signs of anti-Hillary bias.
And waiting. And waiting. And waiting.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- flockofseagulls104
- Posts: 7993
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
Wow, the lengths you will go to justify your hypocrisy is astounding. Strzok didn't allow his STRONG bias to affect his decisions, even though there are emails that strongly suggest he did. Just the fact that he shared these prejudices with his mistress would be grounds for firing in the private sector. But the decision to fire him for that was a dastardly deed. And, so, we need yet another investigation.Bob78164 wrote:As I mentioned earlier, I don’t care whether investigators have political views. That’s inevitable. I do care when investigators allow their political views to affect their decision making.
And it looks like that’s the case with the decision to fire Strzok. My understanding is that the FBI’s professional responsibility unit recommended a suspension but that the Deputy Director, a political appointee, overruled the recommendation. It sounds to me like a reprisal for anti-Donny views.
So there are three questions that need answering. First, what were the grounds for firing Strzok? Second, how has the FBI historically treated similar issues? Third, what process was used to make the decision?
Under the circumstances, a Congessional investigation is obviously appropriate. But the current head of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect the President, and that obviously makes him incapable of doing his job. The only way to fix that problem is to install a different Chair, one who understands the difference between oversight and cheerleading, and that will require a Democratic majority in the House. I’ll take one in the Senate as well. —Bob
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton... gullible idiot
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
If everyone who posted an ugly or off-color e-mail or text message in the private sector to a fellow employee was fired, most businesses would be severely understaffed.flockofseagulls104 wrote: Just the fact that he shared these prejudices with his mistress would be grounds for firing in the private sector.
Do you really think that there weren't any anti-Hillary e-mails or texts sent around the FBI at any time during the investigation of her?
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
This episode is part of the reason that Bob Goodlatte’s son will vote for his father’s Democratic opponent in his father’s reelection race this year. Goodlatte is Chair of the House Judiciary Committee. —Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
You’re being incoherent here. Almost all private-sector employment is at-will, which means you don’t need a reason to fire someone and you’re perfectly free to fire an employee just because you don’t like his politics. But we really don’t want any cop being fired just because Comrade Donny and his handlers don’t like his politics or the possibility that Comrade Donny has handlers. And yet all three of the top people investigating that possibility have now been fired via the direct intervention of political appointees who owe Donny their jobs.flockofseagulls104 wrote:Wow, the lengths you will go to justify your hypocrisy is astounding. Strzok didn't allow his STRONG bias to affect his decisions, even though there are emails that strongly suggest he did. Just the fact that he shared these prejudices with his mistress would be grounds for firing in the private sector. But the decision to fire him for that was a dastardly deed. And, so, we need yet another investigation.Bob78164 wrote:As I mentioned earlier, I don’t care whether investigators have political views. That’s inevitable. I do care when investigators allow their political views to affect their decision making.
And it looks like that’s the case with the decision to fire Strzok. My understanding is that the FBI’s professional responsibility unit recommended a suspension but that the Deputy Director, a political appointee, overruled the recommendation. It sounds to me like a reprisal for anti-Donny views.
So there are three questions that need answering. First, what were the grounds for firing Strzok? Second, how has the FBI historically treated similar issues? Third, what process was used to make the decision?
Under the circumstances, a Congessional investigation is obviously appropriate. But the current head of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect the President, and that obviously makes him incapable of doing his job. The only way to fix that problem is to install a different Chair, one who understands the difference between oversight and cheerleading, and that will require a Democratic majority in the House. I’ll take one in the Senate as well. —Bob
If something like this were happening in a Democratic administration you’d be screaming for a Congressional investigation. I want a Congress that understands the difference between oversight and using your position to protect the Administration, right or wrong. The only way we’re going to get one is with a Democratic majority. And then we’ll start finding out just what Donny has been hiding with the help of his Congessional enablers and the useful idiots who support them for no better reason than their party label. —Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- flockofseagulls104
- Posts: 7993
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
That is the most laughable statement that has ever been posted on this bored. Possibly anywhere. Congratulations, bob-tel!!!I want a Congress that understands the difference between oversight and using your position to protect the Administration, right or wrong. The only way we’re going to get one is with a Democratic majority.
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton... gullible idiot
- BackInTex
- Posts: 12890
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
Not by those assigned to investigate her.silverscreenselect wrote:
Do you really think that there weren't any anti-Hillary e-mails or texts sent around the FBI at any time during the investigation of her?
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
And how do you know?BackInTex wrote:Not by those assigned to investigate her.silverscreenselect wrote:
Do you really think that there weren't any anti-Hillary e-mails or texts sent around the FBI at any time during the investigation of her?
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- BackInTex
- Posts: 12890
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
I’m an expert on the subject. I’m never wrong.silverscreenselect wrote:And how do you know?BackInTex wrote:Not by those assigned to investigate her.silverscreenselect wrote:
Do you really think that there weren't any anti-Hillary e-mails or texts sent around the FBI at any time during the investigation of her?
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- flockofseagulls104
- Posts: 7993
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
Do you really think that if there were anti-Hillary emails or texts when she was "being investigated" that CNN would not be talking about it 24-7? That's how I know.silverscreenselect wrote:And how do you know?BackInTex wrote:Not by those assigned to investigate her.silverscreenselect wrote:
Do you really think that there weren't any anti-Hillary e-mails or texts sent around the FBI at any time during the investigation of her?
Your friendly neighborhood racist. On the waiting list to be a nazi. Designated an honorary 'snowflake'. Trolled by the very best, as well as by BJ. Always typical, unlike others.., Fulminator, Hopelessly in the tank for trump... inappropriate... Flocking himself... Probably a tucking sexist, too... All thought comes from the right wing noise machine(TM)... A clear and present threat to The Future Of Our Democracy.. Doesn't understand anything... Made the trump apologist and enabler playoffs... Heathen bastard... Knows nothing about history... Liar.... don't know much about statistics and polling... Nothing at all about biology... Ignorant Bigot... Potential Future Pariah... Big Nerd... Spiraling, Anti-Trans Bigot.. A Lunatic AND a Bigot.. Very Ignorant of the World in General... Sounds deranged... Fake Christian... Weird... has the mind of a child... has paranoid delusions... Simpleton... gullible idiot
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 21696
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
Just like Guccifer 2.0 released embarrassing e-mails from Donny’s campaign at the same time he released embarrassing e-mails from the Democrats?flockofseagulls104 wrote:Do you really think that if there were anti-Hillary emails or texts when she was "being investigated" that CNN would not be talking about it 24-7? That's how I know.silverscreenselect wrote:And how do you know?BackInTex wrote:
Not by those assigned to investigate her.
Congress wasn’t trying to find information making the investigation of Secretary Clinton unpopular. In contrast, we’ve heard from his own mouth that the Chair of the House Oversight Committee sees it as his job to protect (rather than oversee) Donny. Comey overshared after the investigation concluded because he was afraid that if he didn’t, anti-Clinton agents within the investigation would leak. That, to me, is an example of biases actually affecting actions. You can’t name a single example of Strzok’s politics affecting his investigative decisions, and you can’t name a single example of ANYONE from Mueller’s investigation leaking anything at all.. —Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 23523
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
Whereas Rudy Giuliani has admitted that "loyal" FBI agents leaked information to him about the progress of the Clinton investigation.Bob78164 wrote: You can’t name a single example of Strzok’s politics affecting his investigative decisions, and you can’t name a single example of ANYONE from Mueller’s investigation leaking anything at all.. —Bob
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- tlynn78
- Posts: 8791
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:31 am
- Location: Montana
Re: Peter Strzok FINALLY fired
GOOD NEWS!! You boys can contribute to his GoFundMe!!!
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. -Thomas Paine
You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. -Ayn Rand
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. -Ayn Rand
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire