Eye in the Sky

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13737
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Eye in the Sky

#1 Post by BackInTex » Sat Apr 09, 2016 11:42 am

Went and saw this last night. I hadn't even seen preview or knew what it was until the wife suggested going to a movie and to look to see if there was anything I wanted to see.

The last few movies I saw, I went to because the kids wanted to see them (Batman vs Superman, Star Wars, Divergent, etc.). I don't really enjoy movies where the action is so animated it isn't believable (even if it is done so well it looks real). I don't like movies where the action IS the movie at the expense of a plot.

This movie, Eye in the Sky, was a surprise. A little action, a lot of suspense, and a lot of thought provoking situations, good dialog and as far as I can tell or care, good acting. It is rated R but aside from a couple of F-bombs, it must get its rating for some gore, but it really should be PG-13 in my book (and I'm pretty much a prude).

Two Thumbs Up.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
triviawayne
Posts: 692
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:38 am

Re: Eye in the Sky

#2 Post by triviawayne » Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:45 pm

It only takes three f-bombs for an R rating.

Just like Planes, Trains and Automobiles...one scene has it eleven times, that movie was R

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Eye in the Sky

#3 Post by silverscreenselect » Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:52 pm

triviawayne wrote:It only takes three f-bombs for an R rating.

Just like Planes, Trains and Automobiles...one scene has it eleven times, that movie was R
It's more complicated than that. I've attached a link to the current rules, which have been in place since 2010.

If you look on Page 7, it says that one use of the f-word as an expletive in a non-sexual context results in a PG-13 rating . More than one (or one in a sexual context) requires an R-rating, but that's subject to an exception by a 2/3 vote of the Ratings Board if they feel most American parents would believe that a PG-13 rating is appropriate because of the context or manner in which the words are used or because the use of the words in the motion picture is inconspicuous.

In the last couple of years, a de facto maximum of two uses has become common, but it's not a firm rule. The Ratings Board has leeway to go beyond two if they feel the film warrants a PG-13 rating. Per Wikipedia, The Right Stuff (5) and All the President's Men (7) received PG ratings in the pre-PG-13 era. Gunner Palace, a 2004 documentary about the Iraq war has 42 uses of the F-word in interviews with soldiers and still got a PG-13 rating on appeal.

http://www.filmratings.com/downloads/rating_rules.pdf
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13737
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Eye in the Sky

#4 Post by BackInTex » Sun Apr 10, 2016 7:02 am

None of the f-bombs were directed at anyone or used as a casual conversational word (a la The Big Lewbowski where every other word was an f-bomb). In this movie, they were used as a reaction by the characters in situations of shock, concern, or anger as when they first see the bomb maker assembling suicide vests.

I don't really have a problem with the R rating, I just feel I've seen worse at a PG-13. This is definitely an adult movie if only for the plot/story. Not much of interest for anyone under 16 without an adult to discuss it, IMO.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Eye in the Sky

#5 Post by silverscreenselect » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:59 am

BackInTex wrote:I don't really have a problem with the R rating, I just feel I've seen worse at a PG-13. This is definitely an adult movie if only for the plot/story. Not much of interest for anyone under 16 without an adult to discuss it, IMO.
The opposite problem comes up in regard to G-rated films. A few years ago, there was a movie called The Straight Story. Richard Farnsworth got an Oscar nomination for playing an elderly man who rides hundreds of miles cross country on a tractor to try to reconcile with his estranged brother (it's based on a true story) The film was rated G because it didn't have any type of objectionable material in it, but it definitely wasn't a children's movie. Nevertheless, a number of parents took their kids to see it under the impression that the G rating meant kid's movie, and the kids were predictably completely bored. In addition, some adults stayed away because they were under the exact same impression. Since then, almost every movie intended for adults gets a PG rating because the producers don't want the G-rating.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
SpacemanSpiff
Posts: 2487
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Richmond VA
Contact:

Re: Eye in the Sky

#6 Post by SpacemanSpiff » Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:11 pm

Yep, we've come a long way from Planrt of the Apes (Heston version), which was rated G (the next up option was M, for "mature audiences") despite (obviously fake) blood, language which even today gets blanked out on some networks (goddamn doesn't fly in some circles; in 1968, "damn" wasn't allowed on tv), and moon shots of the astronauts in the first potable water they find.
"If you're dead, you don't have any freedoms at all." - Jason Isbell

Post Reply