Congrats to the Royals

Message

a1mamacat · #1 Post by **a1mamacat** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:48 pm

and that 10th man in the cheap seats....

Appa23 · #2 Post by **Appa23** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 11:02 pm

a1mamacat wrote:and that 10th man in the cheap seats....

It was a nice catch as Moose"s home run cleared the wall.

a1mamacat · #3 Post by **a1mamacat** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 11:23 pm

Appa23 wrote:
a1mamacat wrote:and that 10th man in the cheap seats....
It was a nice catch as Moose"s home run cleared the wall.

for many, it will be a win with an asterisk in the record book..

#4 Post by **Bob78164** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:37 am

a1mamacat wrote:
Appa23 wrote:
a1mamacat wrote:and that 10th man in the cheap seats....
It was a nice catch as Moose"s home run cleared the wall.

for many, it will be a win with an asterisk in the record book..

Jeffrey Maier wrote:Will not.

--Bob

#5 Post by **littlebeast13** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 6:21 am

I find it incredibly ironic that every time an outfielder leaps to catch a ball in front of the wall, he "robbed" the batter of a homer.... yet every time a fan catches a ball behind the wall, the fan "interfered" with the ball in play. You can't have it both ways... and in most actual cases, both assumptions are wrong.

lb13

Appa23 · #6 Post by **Appa23** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:48 am

a1mamacat wrote:
Appa23 wrote:
a1mamacat wrote:and that 10th man in the cheap seats....
It was a nice catch as Moose"s home run cleared the wall.

for many, it will be a win with an asterisk in the record book..

I hope that you are not one of them.

Been shown repeatedly that the ball cleared the padding when it was touched/caught. Oversight shot showed it, during the game and the ESPN replay shows it from 18-19 seconds into the 24 second clip. Per the ground rules of the park, it was a homer.

Looked like it was a good game, though.

#7 Post by **Bob78164** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:03 pm

I just saw an MLB story that observed this will be the first World Series ever between two expansion teams. Every previous Fall Classic has included at least one of the original 16 teams. --Bob

TheConfessor · #8 Post by **TheConfessor** » Sun Oct 25, 2015 1:47 am

Bob78164 wrote:I just saw an MLB story that observed this will be the first World Series ever between two expansion teams. Every previous Fall Classic has included at least one of the original 16 teams. --Bob

Is Louisville one of the "original 16 teams"? Because I grew up being told that Louisville was considered a major league team when Honus Wagner was on the team.

#9 Post by **littlebeast13** » Sun Oct 25, 2015 6:51 am

Bob78164 wrote:I just saw an MLB story that observed this will be the first World Series ever between two expansion teams. Every previous Fall Classic has included at least one of the original 16 teams. --Bob

But the rather odd situation of there being exactly one team from each of baseball's six expansion classes who have won at least one championship will continue on. In fact, any chance of breaking that died when the Astros and Rangers were eliminated...

lb13

WWTBAM Bored

Congrats to the Royals

Congrats to the Royals

Re: Congrats to the Royals

Re: Congrats to the Royals

Re: Congrats to the Royals

Re: Congrats to the Royals

Re: Congrats to the Royals

Re: Congrats to the Royals

Re: Congrats to the Royals

Re: Congrats to the Royals