This is just wrong

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Message
Author
User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: This is just wrong

#51 Post by silverscreenselect » Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:54 pm

TheCalvinator24 wrote: The existence of a single case of someone who claims to have changed their orientation destroys the notion of immutability.
What people claim and what can be scientifically demonstrated are two different things. I can claim I can fly when no one's watching but that doesn't change the laws of physics.

The problem is that sexual "orientation" isn't an all or nothing situation. Various people can be attracted to both sexes in different degrees. Gay people can live heterosexual lives... they've done so for centuries. That doesn't change what or who physically stimulates them and to what extent.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: This is just wrong

#52 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:36 am

Of course, the whole discussion has ignored the fact that there is no scientific evidence that homosexuality is a genetically-determined characteristic in the first place. Until and unless a genetic source can be proved, the entire "born gay" position is based on nothing more than anecdotal claims, as well.

mrkelley, I disagree that anyone has ever changed his or her race or gender (although sex is really the correct term anyway).

One can change the external features that we often associate with a particular sex, but quite simply, crafting a faux-penis does not turn a woman into a man and likewise lopping off a penis and crafting a faux-vagina does not turn a man into a woman.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 22160
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: This is just wrong

#53 Post by Bob78164 » Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:43 am

TheCalvinator24 wrote:Of course, the whole discussion has ignored the fact that there is no scientific evidence that homosexuality is a genetically-determined characteristic in the first place. Until and unless a genetic source can be proved, the entire "born gay" position is based on nothing more than anecdotal claims, as well.
When did you make the choice to be interested in women instead of men? Because if people aren't born gay, they're not born straight either. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7635
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: This is just wrong

#54 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:52 am

RULE 603. OATH OR AFFIRMATION TO TESTIFY TRUTHFULLY

Before testifying, a witness must give an oath or affirmation to testify truthfully. It must be in a form designed to impress that duty on the witness’s conscience.

Notes

(Pub. L. 93–595, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1934; Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Oct. 1, 1987; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.)

Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules

The rule is designed to afford the flexibility required in dealing with religious adults, atheists, conscientious objectors, mental defectives, and children. Affirmation is simply a solemn undertaking to tell the truth; no special verbal formula is required. As is true generally, affirmation is recognized by federal law. “Oath” includes affirmation, 1 U.S.C. §1; judges and clerks may administer oaths and affirmations, 28 U.S.C. §§459, 953; and affirmations are acceptable in lieu of oaths under Rule 43(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Perjury by a witness is a crime, 18 U.S.C. §1621.
RULE 610. RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR OPINIONS

Evidence of a witness’s religious beliefs or opinions is not admissible to attack or support the witness’s credibility.

Notes

(Pub. L. 93–595, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1936; Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Oct. 1, 1987; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.)

Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules

While the rule forecloses inquiry into the religious beliefs or opinions of a witness for the purpose of showing that his character for truthfulness is affected by their nature, an inquiry for the purpose of showing interest or bias because of them is not within the prohibition. Thus disclosure of affiliation with a church which is a party to the litigation would be allowable under the rule. Cf. Tucker v. Reil, 51 Ariz. 357, 77 P.2d 203 (1938). To the same effect, though less specifically worded, is California Evidence Code §789. See 3 Wigmore §936.
Since this started with a the oath of office, posted by a lawyer, I thought I would I would share some of the Federal Rules of Evidence adopted in 1975.
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13739
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: This is just wrong

#55 Post by BackInTex » Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:57 am

Bob78164 wrote: Because if people aren't born gay, they're not born straight either. --Bob
You're getting close.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: This is just wrong

#56 Post by silverscreenselect » Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:14 am

TheCalvinator24 wrote:Until and unless a genetic source can be proved, the entire "born gay" position is based on nothing more than anecdotal claims, as well.
Whether or not one is "born" gay is beside the point. The question is whether it's a quality that one can readily change. People who lose an arm or a leg aren't born that way either but once it happens, it can't be changed.

There are tests (primarily used with pederasts) that measure people's physiological reactions when subjected to certain stimuli (not just the obvious male one, but things like dilation of the eyes). People don't change their sexual orientation. Most people can choose with whom they will engage in sexual activity or enter into a marriage or marriage-like union (which isn't always the same thing as having sex with the other person). Because a lot of people are bisexual to a certain extent, they may find it easier to forego homosexual activities in favor of heterosexual ones, but the desires are still there. If they weren't, you wouldn't have all those conservative religious types who get caught with other guys.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
jarnon
Posts: 7005
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Merion, Pa.

Re: This is just wrong

#57 Post by jarnon » Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:31 am

I researched the history of the enlistment oath, and found this informative article, written by an Air Force officer. In particular, it explains why "so help me God" was added in 1962 (shortly after "under God" was inserted in the Pledge of Allegiance).

http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airc ... eskel.html
Слава Україні!

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: This is just wrong

#58 Post by Bob Juch » Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:08 am

Before testifying, a witness must give an oath or affirmation to testify truthfully. It must be in a form designed to impress that duty on the witness’s conscience.
So if the witness does not believe in God, swearing to God to tell the truth is not the proper form.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
elwoodblues
Posts: 3894
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:36 pm
Location: Texas

Re: This is just wrong

#59 Post by elwoodblues » Sat Sep 13, 2014 6:25 am

I chose to be straight around the time that Farrah Fawcett poster came out.

User avatar
littlebeast13
Dumbass
Posts: 31592
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
Contact:

Re: This is just wrong

#60 Post by littlebeast13 » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:17 am

elwoodblues wrote:I chose to be straight around the time that Farrah Fawcett poster came out.

Just imagine if you had seen the Tino album first....

Image

lb13

User avatar
elwoodblues
Posts: 3894
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:36 pm
Location: Texas

Re: This is just wrong

#61 Post by elwoodblues » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:26 am

littlebeast13 wrote:
elwoodblues wrote:I chose to be straight around the time that Farrah Fawcett poster came out.

Just imagine if you had seen the Tino album first....

Image

lb13
Not that there's anything wrong with it...

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 22160
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: This is just wrong

#62 Post by Bob78164 » Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:18 am

littlebeast13 wrote:
elwoodblues wrote:I chose to be straight around the time that Farrah Fawcett poster came out.

Just imagine if you had seen the Tino album first....

Image

lb13
Careful! Are you trying to get him to switch teams? --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: This is just wrong

#63 Post by Bob Juch » Sat Sep 13, 2014 10:29 am

elwoodblues wrote:I chose to be straight around the time that Farrah Fawcett poster came out.
I never knew it was in the closet.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 22160
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: This is just wrong

#64 Post by Bob78164 » Thu Sep 18, 2014 8:56 am

The Air Force backed down. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

Post Reply