The Moral Case Against Watching Football

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#1 Post by Bob Juch » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:40 am

Is it immoral to consume violent entertainment that can result in dire, even deadly consequences for its participants? Is it immoral to cheer for a dazzling show knowing it could cause its stars to develop dementia or memory loss or depression?

That is to say, is it immoral to watch football?

In a punchy new manifesto, New York Times bestselling author Steve Almond argues that it is.

“This book is partly an attempt to say, 'Something is off here,'” Almond said in an interview with The Huffington Post. “Why is our most popular form of entertainment this unnecessarily violent, degrading spectacle that churns through the players who play it?”
Full story: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/0 ... 18939.html
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
SportsFan68
No Scritches!!!
Posts: 21300
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#2 Post by SportsFan68 » Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:43 am

I read the article (not the book, though), and I have to agree with this:

He says people who believe the game can’t change are simply cynical. “That is what people always say," he said. "Moral progress is inconvenient. It requires people taking stock of their own behaviors and making inconvenient decisions that are hard in the short term and beneficial in the long term. America as a rule sucks at it but can be very good at it when sufficiently roused.”

Changes have been made and will continue to be made. Houston's DJ Swearinger hit Wes Welker on the helmet and drew a penalty, not to mention the well-publicized "taunt" from Peyton Manning, who called the $8,200 fine "money well spent." Yeah, yeah, it coulda been $82,000 and never made a dent in Peyton's bottom line.

The money is unbelievable. And that's why things will change. Controls over head to head or shoulder to head hits will continue to tighten up. Parents all over the country are refusing to sign permission slips for football because they want their sons in soccer instead. That will continue, to the long-term detriment of the NFL, until the NFL can show that the chances of those sons emerging from NFL careers with their brains intact are much better than the chances they'll emerge as blithering idiots.

Y'all have seen me rail against fracking in the past. It was a short-term benefit to corporations to remove fracking from the purview of the Clean Water Act, but in the long term, when more and more groundwater is poisoned by fracking fluids, gazillion dollar lawsuits will assure tighter controls or an end to the practice.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#3 Post by Bob Juch » Sun Sep 07, 2014 11:15 am

SportsFan68 wrote:I read the article (not the book, though), and I have to agree with this:

He says people who believe the game can’t change are simply cynical. “That is what people always say," he said. "Moral progress is inconvenient. It requires people taking stock of their own behaviors and making inconvenient decisions that are hard in the short term and beneficial in the long term. America as a rule sucks at it but can be very good at it when sufficiently roused.”

Changes have been made and will continue to be made. Houston's DJ Swearinger hit Wes Welker on the helmet and drew a penalty, not to mention the well-publicized "taunt" from Peyton Manning, who called the $8,200 fine "money well spent." Yeah, yeah, it coulda been $82,000 and never made a dent in Peyton's bottom line.

The money is unbelievable. And that's why things will change. Controls over head to head or shoulder to head hits will continue to tighten up. Parents all over the country are refusing to sign permission slips for football because they want their sons in soccer instead. That will continue, to the long-term detriment of the NFL, until the NFL can show that the chances of those sons emerging from NFL careers with their brains intact are much better than the chances they'll emerge as blithering idiots.

Y'all have seen me rail against fracking in the past. It was a short-term benefit to corporations to remove fracking from the purview of the Clean Water Act, but in the long term, when more and more groundwater is poisoned by fracking fluids, gazillion dollar lawsuits will assure tighter controls or an end to the practice.
I hope you're right.

Soccer has lots of concussions too.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7635
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#4 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Sun Sep 07, 2014 1:08 pm

Next up: The Moral Case Against The Space Program
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13739
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#5 Post by BackInTex » Sun Sep 07, 2014 1:48 pm

themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:Next up: The Moral Case Against The Space Program
What about the moral case against government provided welfare? It has damaged a much larger part of our society than football. And that damage is longer lasting.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7635
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#6 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Sun Sep 07, 2014 2:04 pm

Next up: The Moral Case Against The Space Program
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
Jeemie
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#7 Post by Jeemie » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:04 am

As people become more informed, they are making their own choices as to whether to participate or watch.

No need to turn it into a moral case. Football will live or die based on its ability to attract new players.

Just make sure the information flows freely so individuals can make their own choices.
1979 City of Champions 2009

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#8 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:10 am

Jeemie wrote:As people become more informed, they are making their own choices as to whether to participate or watch.

No need to turn it into a moral case. Football will live or die based on its ability to attract new players.

Just make sure the information flows freely so individuals can make their own choices.
That didn't work for bullfighting. It was public morality that caused changes in many countries.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13739
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#9 Post by BackInTex » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:31 am

Bob Juch wrote:
Jeemie wrote:As people become more informed, they are making their own choices as to whether to participate or watch.

No need to turn it into a moral case. Football will live or die based on its ability to attract new players.

Just make sure the information flows freely so individuals can make their own choices.
That didn't work for bullfighting. It was public morality that caused changes in many countries.
The bulls weren't participating of their own volition. And they had no union. Or sneaker contracts.
Last edited by BackInTex on Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
christie1111
11:11
Posts: 11630
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:54 am
Location: CT

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#10 Post by christie1111 » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:44 am

I like watching football and will continue to do so.

I will also continue to watch and enjoy watching Son1111 play football.

He started on Saturday. Played the whole game on offense except for one series of downs.

Go Monarchs!
"A bed without a quilt is like the sky without stars"

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7635
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#11 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:51 am

Bob Juch wrote:
Jeemie wrote:As people become more informed, they are making their own choices as to whether to participate or watch.

No need to turn it into a moral case. Football will live or die based on its ability to attract new players.

Just make sure the information flows freely so individuals can make their own choices.
That didn't work for bullfighting. It was public morality that caused changes in many countries.
As a control group how did most bulls who were not chosen for bull fighting make out?
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13739
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#12 Post by BackInTex » Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:04 am

themanintheseersuckersuit wrote: As a control group how did most bulls who were not chosen for bull fighting make out?
I think many of them went on to have successful legal and political careers. The control group exhibited a higher than average ability to generate large amounts of BS, a valued attribute in the those professions.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#13 Post by silverscreenselect » Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:09 am

Bob Juch wrote:
Is it immoral to consume violent entertainment that can result in dire, even deadly consequences for its participants? Is it immoral to cheer for a dazzling show knowing it could cause its stars to develop dementia or memory loss or depression?

That is to say, is it immoral to watch football?

In a punchy new manifesto, New York Times bestselling author Steve Almond argues that it is.
People have been making the moral case against boxing for over a century and what's happened?

We've now "graduated" to Mixed Martial Arts.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
SpacemanSpiff
Posts: 2487
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Richmond VA
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#14 Post by SpacemanSpiff » Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:15 am

themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
Jeemie wrote:As people become more informed, they are making their own choices as to whether to participate or watch.

No need to turn it into a moral case. Football will live or die based on its ability to attract new players.

Just make sure the information flows freely so individuals can make their own choices.
That didn't work for bullfighting. It was public morality that caused changes in many countries.
As a control group how did most bulls who were not chosen for bull fighting make out?
I'll ask Ferdinand.
"If you're dead, you don't have any freedoms at all." - Jason Isbell

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#15 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:40 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
Is it immoral to consume violent entertainment that can result in dire, even deadly consequences for its participants? Is it immoral to cheer for a dazzling show knowing it could cause its stars to develop dementia or memory loss or depression?

That is to say, is it immoral to watch football?

In a punchy new manifesto, New York Times bestselling author Steve Almond argues that it is.
People have been making the moral case against boxing for over a century and what's happened?

We've now "graduated" to Mixed Martial Arts.
But MMA is just as phony as wrestling. Boxing is much safer than it used to be.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#16 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:41 am

themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
Jeemie wrote:As people become more informed, they are making their own choices as to whether to participate or watch.

No need to turn it into a moral case. Football will live or die based on its ability to attract new players.

Just make sure the information flows freely so individuals can make their own choices.
That didn't work for bullfighting. It was public morality that caused changes in many countries.
As a control group how did most bulls who were not chosen for bull fighting make out?
They had a lot of sex.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#17 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:41 am

BackInTex wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
Jeemie wrote:As people become more informed, they are making their own choices as to whether to participate or watch.

No need to turn it into a moral case. Football will live or die based on its ability to attract new players.

Just make sure the information flows freely so individuals can make their own choices.
That didn't work for bullfighting. It was public morality that caused changes in many countries.
The bulls weren't participating of their own volition. And they had no union. Or sneaker contracts.
Yes, but they were smarter than the average pro football player.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#18 Post by silverscreenselect » Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:44 am

Bob Juch wrote: But MMA is just as phony as wrestling. Boxing is much safer than it used to be.
Tell that to Frankie Leal.

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/98 ... ee-days-ko
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#19 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:46 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
Bob Juch wrote: But MMA is just as phony as wrestling. Boxing is much safer than it used to be.
Tell that to Frankie Leal.

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/98 ... ee-days-ko
Correction: Boxing in this country is safer than it used to be. Still nothing is completely safe.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Vandal
Director of Promos
Posts: 7515
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:42 pm
Location: Literary Circles
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#20 Post by Vandal » Mon Sep 08, 2014 2:41 pm

After week 1, there is a moral case against watching the Patriots.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Visit my website: http://www.rmclarkauthor.com

User avatar
littlebeast13
Dumbass
Posts: 31592
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#21 Post by littlebeast13 » Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:35 am

I had the best record among everyone in the Bored Pick Em contest for Week 1. I say let the games continue... injuries be damned!

lb13

User avatar
Vandal
Director of Promos
Posts: 7515
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:42 pm
Location: Literary Circles
Contact:

Re: The Moral Case Against Watching Football

#22 Post by Vandal » Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:19 pm

ESPN.com adds to the cause:


Image
_________________________________________________________________________________
Visit my website: http://www.rmclarkauthor.com

Post Reply