Phone-A-Friend gender for female contestants

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
SOX404Guru
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:57 am

Phone-A-Friend gender for female contestants

#1 Post by SOX404Guru » Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:15 am

Hi! First of all...very impressive chat room!

I'm doing research on the % of times female contestants use female friends vs. male friends. I've dug through transcripts for the first 3 season on a different site, but am unable to get gender data of PAF's on http://www.wwtbam.biz. I'm only interested in the data for October contestants (2005 & 2006). For 2007, I can't get the gender data for the following archived contestants:
Nichole Wolfe
Friday, September 28, 2007

Kim Barrile
Monday, October 1, 2007

Kim Fravel
Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Jaime Gusdorff
Thursday, October 4, 2007

Nancy Pinkston
Friday, October 5, 2007

Marianne Tertan
Monday, October 8, 2007


BTW: If anyone is aware that this research already exists, I'd be very appreciative.

Thank you!

Mark

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27965
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Phone-A-Friend gender for female contestants

#2 Post by MarleysGh0st » Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:23 am

Welcome, Mark!
SOX404Guru wrote:Marianne Tertan
Monday, October 8, 2007
Marianne called her son, John.

viewtopic.php?t=44

We've had some disruption in our transcripts, due to our old message board being abruptly terminated by its old host on October 2. Transcripts from the shows between Oct. 2 and Oct. 8 are on the interim boards we used as alternates. See, for instance, this one:
http://www.grandslamshow.com/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=4

What's your research for, if I may ask?


We should be able to track down those dates before Oct. 2, but it might take a little longer.

User avatar
silvercamaro
Dog's Best Friend
Posts: 9608
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am

Re: Phone-A-Friend gender for female contestants

#3 Post by silvercamaro » Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:39 am

MarleysGh0st wrote:What's your research for, if I may ask?
Given the baseball-sounding handle, I'm guessing it's for that new field of game-play statistical research, pafermetrics.

:)

User avatar
earendel
Posts: 13831
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
Location: mired in the bureaucracy

Re: Phone-A-Friend gender for female contestants

#4 Post by earendel » Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:00 pm

silvercamaro wrote:
MarleysGh0st wrote:What's your research for, if I may ask?
Given the baseball-sounding handle, I'm guessing it's for that new field of game-play statistical research, pafermetrics.

:)
<groan> I love it! :roll:
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."

SOX404Guru
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:57 am

#5 Post by SOX404Guru » Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:09 pm

Thank you MarleysGh0st!!! And thanks for trying to dig up the earlier data.

To answer your question: I'm writing a book regarding gender-based myths women possess. One of the chapters covers the "glass ceiling" and I used the success of men on the show as an example. I want to use the Phone A Friend data to show that even women realize that their most knowledgeable friend is frequently a man. I'm using the data for October for each season of the syndicated series for the PAF data.

I hope that doesn't dissuade you from digging up that info. A gap in my research throws doubt on its credibility.

Thank you again!

SOX404Guru
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:57 am

SOX404Guru meaning

#6 Post by SOX404Guru » Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:12 pm

SOX404 refers to section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act, for which I'm a consultant.

I'm not from Boston, but for some reason I always root for them (and against the Yankees even though I love NY). But I expect the red hot and rested Rockies will win the Series.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27965
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

#7 Post by MarleysGh0st » Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:25 pm

SOX404Guru wrote: I hope that doesn't dissuade you from digging up that info.
Maybe someone else will have comments about that, but I won't.

As for some of the others on your list (only one was on the particular alternate board I linked to, and one more was on this "Bored"):
Kim Fravel
Wednesday, October 3, 2007
Kim called TJ, a male coworker of her husband's.

http://www.grandslamshow.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=61
Jaime Gusdorff
Thursday, October 4, 2007
Jaime called her cousin, Dan.

http://millionaire.megabb.com/all-messa ... er-t66.htm
Nancy Pinkston
Friday, October 5, 2007
Nancy carried over to the Oct. 8 show, when she called A.J, who is referred to as a "he".

viewtopic.php?t=43




Request to my fellow transcriptionists: Who did the transcripts on Friday, Sept. 28 and Monday, Oct. 1? Did you save copies of those transcripts that can supply these details?

User avatar
Rexer25
It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
Posts: 2899
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Just this side of nowhere

Re: SOX404Guru meaning

#8 Post by Rexer25 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:32 pm

SOX404Guru wrote:SOX404 refers to section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act, for which I'm a consultant.
Strange, I thought he was in charge of redirecting requests to the White Sox web site.

(I just know only 2 people are gonna understand this)

My disclaimer is in my signature.
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!

That'll be $10, please.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27965
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: SOX404Guru meaning

#9 Post by MarleysGh0st » Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:33 pm

Rexer25 wrote:
SOX404Guru wrote:SOX404 refers to section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act, for which I'm a consultant.
Strange, I thought he was in charge of redirecting requests to the White Sox web site.

(I just know only 2 people are gonna understand this)

My disclaimer is in my signature.
Who's the other one? :lol:

User avatar
pcmaxey
Posts: 155
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:58 pm

#10 Post by pcmaxey » Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:26 pm

Nicole Wolfe carried over to the Monday, October 1 show.
She called her friend Rick.
http://millionaire.megabb.com/all-messa ... lfe-t7.htm

Kim Barrile - Monday, October 1.
She called her friend Gary.
http://millionaire.megabb.com/all-messa ... ile-t8.htm

SOX404Guru
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:57 am

#11 Post by SOX404Guru » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:25 pm

Thank you pcmaxey, and thank you again MarleysGh0st. Wow, women have used male Phone A Friends over 80% of the time for the 4 seasons I analyzed. I suspected it would be over 50%, but never thought it would be that high. What a revelation! It'll make a great addition to my book's section on Intelligence & Ambition.

I am still in need of 2005 and 2006 October data. Does anyone know where I might be able to find it? The http://www.wwtbam.biz/test.php archives don't give names of Phone A Friends.

I'm willing to pay for the transcripts, even if I have to get official transcripts but I've been unable to locate them on Disney, ABC, or Buena Vista.

Any suggestions?

Thanks again.

User avatar
pcmaxey
Posts: 155
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:58 pm

#12 Post by pcmaxey » Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:38 pm

SOX404Guru wrote: I am still in need of 2005 and 2006 October data. Does anyone know where I might be able to find it?
In the files section of this web site: http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/phoenixbored2/
there are two word docs, WWTBAM4 & WWTBAM5.

If you want me to email you what I have just let me know where to send the files.

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21971
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

#13 Post by Bob78164 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:29 pm

SOX404Guru wrote:Thank you MarleysGh0st!!! And thanks for trying to dig up the earlier data.

To answer your question: I'm writing a book regarding gender-based myths women possess. One of the chapters covers the "glass ceiling" and I used the success of men on the show as an example. I want to use the Phone A Friend data to show that even women realize that their most knowledgeable friend is frequently a man. I'm using the data for October for each season of the syndicated series for the PAF data.

I hope that doesn't dissuade you from digging up that info. A gap in my research throws doubt on its credibility.

Thank you again!
It occurs to me that there's at least one other possible explanation. Men may be more willing than women to accept the stress inherent in being a PAF. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

SOX404Guru
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:57 am

PAF being stressful for women

#14 Post by SOX404Guru » Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:04 pm

Thanks again pcmaxey! You've already been so helpful that I'll grab those files myself (as soon as the owner lets me in).

Bob78164, nervousness, fear of public appearance and public humiliation were among the reason many websites gave to explain why only 11 of the first 100 contestants were women. Even after they adjusted the double-blind phone quiz selection process, women still represented only 20% of the first 600 contestants.

I find it hard to believe that anyone would turn down being a PAF for this reason, but then again, I find it hard to believe anyone wouldn't jump at a chance to be on "Millionaire".

Mark

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 21971
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: PAF being stressful for women

#15 Post by Bob78164 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:34 pm

SOX404Guru wrote:Bob78164, nervousness, fear of public appearance and public humiliation were among the reason many websites gave to explain why only 11 of the first 100 contestants were women. Even after they adjusted the double-blind phone quiz selection process, women still represented only 20% of the first 600 contestants.

I find it hard to believe that anyone would turn down being a PAF for this reason, but then again, I find it hard to believe anyone wouldn't jump at a chance to be on "Millionaire".
We have examples right here on the Bored. Many posters, and if memory serves it's mostly women, don't want the responsibility of being a PAF. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
silvercamaro
Dog's Best Friend
Posts: 9608
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am

#16 Post by silvercamaro » Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:02 pm

Bob78164 wrote: It occurs to me that there's at least one other possible explanation. Men may be more willing than women to accept the stress inherent in being a PAF. --Bob
A better explanation may have to do with the time commitment required for being a PAF. PAFS are asked to remain close to the phone for up to five or six hours (and sometimes needing to do it all over again the next day, if the contestant is not seated the first day or is the last contestant of a taping day and carried over before using the lifeline.) Most women with children at home would find that difficult. Older kids might need to be picked up after school and/or transported to lessons (such as music or dance,) sports practices, or other activities. In addition, the "ideal" PAF probably has a desk job that does not require much activity or interaction with others outside reach of the telephone and definitely not on the phone. My belief (meaning I'm not going to go search for statistics to support my intuition) is that a far smaller percentage of women have such positions.

IMO, the time commitment is far more of a barrier for most women than stress.

In my own case as a contestant, my PAF list was comprised of the five most intelligent people I knew -- all with varied specific areas of expertise -- who could promise to stay by the phone. All were men, but I had not considered gender in their selection. In serving as a PAF, I have been on many lists, and I've been called on-air four or five times -- all by men. Only one of those men had what he considered as a "girlie" question -- and, sadly, I didn't know that answer.

SOX404Guru
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:57 am

#17 Post by SOX404Guru » Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:28 am

Hmmm, you make a very logical argument silvercamaro. I can see why you were used as a PAF so often.

However, I have to include use the data in my book because the ratio is so high in favor of men, which strongly supports several controversial contentions I propose.

I just hope that your explanation won't be apparent to readers without your insight and experience as a contestant and PAF.

Just curious: How much did you win?

User avatar
takinover
Posts: 761
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:34 pm
Location: Parts Unknown
Contact:

#18 Post by takinover » Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:08 am

All of the available data doesn't take into account who else was in the room with the PAF that was used on air. My PAF had other people in the room with her (though she didn't need them :D )

Also just because someone chooses someone as a PAF, doesn't mean that they think they are the "smartest". Each person has their own criteria for how they select who they want to be their PAF. Since I am a guy, I wanted to cover my weak areas which includes many of the "girlie-girl" topics. That is why I had 3 women on my PAF team (I was originally gonna get all 5 women but opted for a little gender diversity). Maybe many of the women are dreading getting something "guyish" so that is why they put more men on the PAF list, not because they think they are smarter.

Editing to add that we all can be equally "smart" with the proper search engine and a little practice.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#19 Post by peacock2121 » Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:07 am

My PaF list had 3 men and 2 women. If I had gotten a medical question or a literature question, I would have called a woman. I didn't, so I called my google PaF, who happened to be a man.

He says he is anyway - and he says he is not short, but we know differently.

Bob##s and Ms Camaro give other reasons for the stats. I am sure there are others as well.

User avatar
earendel
Posts: 13831
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
Location: mired in the bureaucracy

Girls and PAF duty

#20 Post by earendel » Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:11 am

When I got the call to be on the show I began to think of who would be able to fill in the gaps in my knowledge base. I asked several women to be on my PAF team but only one of them accepted. The others gave variations on the "Oh, I don't do well under pressure" excuse - they were good at trivia but didn't think that they could do well in the 30 seconds allotted for the PAF call.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4884
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

#21 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:01 am

My PaF list had 3 men and 2 women. I filled particular gaps without regard to the sex of the PaF.

(Cal, who continues to fight the pointless battle against the misuse of the word "gender.")
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#22 Post by peacock2121 » Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:02 am

TheCalvinator24 wrote:My PaF list had 3 men and 2 women. I filled particular gaps without regard to the sex of the PaF.

(Cal, who continues to fight the pointless battle against the misuse of the word "gender.")
It can't be pointless - otherwise you would not continue to fight.

User avatar
Ritterskoop
Posts: 5846
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:16 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

#23 Post by Ritterskoop » Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:41 am

Sex is what you choose. Gender we are born with, mostly.
If you fail to pilot your own ship, don't be surprised at what inappropriate port you find yourself docked. - Tom Robbins
--------
At the moment of commitment, the universe conspires to assist you. - attributed to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.

User avatar
Bixby17
Posts: 519
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:10 pm

Re: PAF being stressful for women

#24 Post by Bixby17 » Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:28 am

SOX404Guru wrote:Thanks again pcmaxey! You've already been so helpful that I'll grab those files myself (as soon as the owner lets me in).

Bob78164, nervousness, fear of public appearance and public humiliation were among the reason many websites gave to explain why only 11 of the first 100 contestants were women. Even after they adjusted the double-blind phone quiz selection process, women still represented only 20% of the first 600 contestants.

I find it hard to believe that anyone would turn down being a PAF for this reason, but then again, I find it hard to believe anyone wouldn't jump at a chance to be on "Millionaire".

Mark
I am a female who was on WWTBAM. I've also served as a phone a friend and would do it more often except for the time commitment involved conflicts with my family obligations. I've also tried to be on other game shows as well.

I have little fear of making public appearances and public humiliation.

I got on the show after doing the in person test and audition process. I did not do the phone game process to get on the show because I thought the odds were like playing the lotto, and I don't waste my time on that either. Why waste my time with busy signals for something that is such a long shot?

When they had in person auditions in the city I lived in, it was convenient and I figured that it was a more realistic shot to be able to get on the show. And that proved to be right for me.

Sports radio host Jim Rome says the reason that women don't call sports talk shows is that as a group we are too sensible to do that.

Also, I had 4 male PaFs and 1 group of female PaFs. The reason for that ratio was simple. I am a female and know a lot of the traditionally female trivia areas, so why would I get a lot of female PaFs in an area I already know a lot about? Though I know a lot of subjects that are traditionally male subjects, I also have some weaknesses on some of those subjects, so I picked PaFs accordingly. I also picked someone from the MB who was good at googling, had the ability to do the time commitment and he happened to be a guy.

One of my first choice PaFs who happened to be male couldn't do it because of work conflicts. Some of my male PaFs also expressed concerns about the process and the pressure on them, but I made a point that I just wanted them to try their best.

I think that you can prove a lot of things with statistics, but there are signficant limits as well.

User avatar
starfish1113
Posts: 1156
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Mount Airy, MD
Contact:

#25 Post by starfish1113 » Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:37 am

peacock2121 wrote:My PaF list had 3 men and 2 women. If I had gotten a medical question or a literature question, I would have called a woman. I didn't, so I called my google PaF, who happened to be a man.

He says he is anyway - and he says he is not short, but we know differently.

Bob##s and Ms Camaro give other reasons for the stats. I am sure there are others as well.
[Austin Powers] I'm a MAN, baby!![/Austin Powers]

FWIW, I've been an on-air PAF five times, four times for women and once for a man. My only qualification for such an honor is an ability to Google and a disturbing fascination with popular music. It didn't have anything to do with my gender or height.

Post Reply