http://www.bravotv.com/blogs/the-dish/b ... pted-shows
Why Not, Minot? (working title)
Produced by Leftfield Entertainment with Brent Montgomery, David George and Will Nothacker serving as Executive Producers.
Minot, North Dakota is home of a modern day Gold Rush with individuals and families from all over the country flocking to this unexpectedly wealthy area for a chance to strike it rich and ask Why Not, Minot?
As of now, I am not a member of the cast. If I win the lottery, maybe then.
I have/had a couple of customers that would fit the bill.
Bravo possible new shows
-
Bob Juch
- Posts: 27133
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Bravo possible new shows
My answer to that question:
Spoiler
Because it's too freaking cold!
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
-
silverscreenselect
- Posts: 24669
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Bravo possible new shows
That show's currently on the FX Network. It's called Fargo.kusch wrote: Why Not, Minot? (working title)
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
-
themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: Bravo possible new shows
Please Please, just anything as long as it is not another show set in South Carolina
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.