Pharmaceutical ads

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Pharmaceutical ads

#1 Post by MarleysGh0st » Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:43 am

Somebody's got to post something on the Bored, today, so let me start with a grumble about some ads that are airing now.

First, there's the woman who says she's tired about having to explain about her moderate to severe [disease I'd never heard of before they started running the commercial]. Who talks that way? If she has to say anything to anybody, it's just that she has [disease I'd never heard of before they started running the commercial]. OTOH, I guess people who only have a light case of [disease I'd never heard of before they started running the commercial] must be pretty fortunate.

Next, there's that ad for the [testosterone cream] 1.62%. It must be a weird intersection of regulations that limit the strength of the product to exactly 1.62%. with the outlook of advertising people who decide to turn 1.62%. into a marketing campaign. I wonder how many customers they lose, who might not be satisfied with anything less than, say, 1.75%?




There, now I've vented. Carry on.

User avatar
christie1111
11:11
Posts: 11630
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:54 am
Location: CT

Re: Pharmaceutical ads

#2 Post by christie1111 » Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:56 am

So when will the birds be returning?

I am so looking forward to anything Spring related. Even losing an hour of sleep was a good thing!
"A bed without a quilt is like the sky without stars"

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Pharmaceutical ads

#3 Post by MarleysGh0st » Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:04 am

christie1111 wrote:So when will the birds be returning?
Last year, they came back during the first week of April, but this has been a pretty severe winter, so I wouldn't be surprised if they delay their return a bit longer. I don't know if the ice has even melted off the pond, yet.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Pharmaceutical ads

#4 Post by Bob Juch » Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:14 am

MarleysGh0st wrote:Somebody's got to post something on the Bored, today, so let me start with a grumble about some ads that are airing now.

First, there's the woman who says she's tired about having to explain about her moderate to severe [disease I'd never heard of before they started running the commercial]. Who talks that way? If she has to say anything to anybody, it's just that she has [disease I'd never heard of before they started running the commercial]. OTOH, I guess people who only have a light case of [disease I'd never heard of before they started running the commercial] must be pretty fortunate.

Next, there's that ad for the [testosterone cream] 1.62%. It must be a weird intersection of regulations that limit the strength of the product to exactly 1.62%. with the outlook of advertising people who decide to turn 1.62%. into a marketing campaign. I wonder how many customers they lose, who might not be satisfied with anything less than, say, 1.75%?

There, now I've vented. Carry on.
Doctors of course hate these ads because they have to spend a lot of time explaining to their patients why the drug isn't appropriate for them.

I don't see why anyone would want to take any of these drugs after hearing the long list of possible side effects, e.g. "may cause sudden death."
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

Re: Pharmaceutical ads

#5 Post by ne1410s » Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:00 am

It seems that the lead time between a new drug coming out and the ads from lawyers who want to sue for side effects of said drugs has greatly shortened.
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
littlebeast13
Dumbass
Posts: 31594
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
Contact:

Re: Pharmaceutical ads

#6 Post by littlebeast13 » Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:21 am

MarleysGh0st wrote:First, there's the woman who says she's tired about having to explain about her moderate to severe [disease I'd never heard of before they started running the commercial]. Who talks that way? If she has to say anything to anybody, it's just that she has [disease I'd never heard of before they started running the commercial]. OTOH, I guess people who only have a light case of [disease I'd never heard of before they started running the commercial] must be pretty fortunate.

I can think of someone who would complain exactly like that, but I can't mention said person in this thread since said person hasn't posted in it yet....

lb13

User avatar
ten96lt
Posts: 1738
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:17 am

Re: Pharmaceutical ads

#7 Post by ten96lt » Sun Mar 09, 2014 12:14 pm

Bob Juch wrote: I don't see why anyone would want to take any of these drugs after hearing the long list of possible side effects, e.g. "may cause sudden death."
The favorite running gag with my dad and I on these commercials whenever we see one is, "If you experience sudden death, seek medical attention immediately."

User avatar
SportsFan68
No Scritches!!!
Posts: 21300
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: Pharmaceutical ads

#8 Post by SportsFan68 » Sun Mar 09, 2014 12:50 pm

I agree. Whenever that particular side effect comes up, I mutter, "Who would take that stuff?" if I'm watching by myself or out loud if I'm watching with someone else.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller

User avatar
Snaxx
Posts: 4671
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:24 pm
Location: I've been everywhere. Really? Not quite really.
Contact:

Re: Pharmaceutical ads

#9 Post by Snaxx » Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:20 pm

About three weeks ago ABC World News Tonight had a brief about those ads, saying the FDA was considering reducing the required side effect warnings to the most serious ones. Given that drug companies purchase of the lion's share of World News's ads, such a change would make World News Tonight a much shorter program.
---
Winner of 2011 Sports Madness :mrgreen:

User avatar
ksbirchtree
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:48 am
Location: Kansas

Re: Pharmaceutical ads

#10 Post by ksbirchtree » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:30 am

There's a stupid ad on the radio station I listen to right now... starts with someone saying they are blind, and isn't it weird to hear a blind person on the radio. Then goes on talking about how their brain won't shut off at night so they can get some sleep, and calls it Non24... something. Just so stupid! Like blind people have the corner on not being able to sleep.

Oh, and the PAB ads on tv.....

Christy
who also quilts
Live simply.... eat, sleep, quilt!

User avatar
littlebeast13
Dumbass
Posts: 31594
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
Contact:

Re: Pharmaceutical ads

#11 Post by littlebeast13 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:33 am

The video is fake, but the audio is a real radio ad....



lb13

Post Reply