The forum for general posting. Come join the madness.

-
themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
#1
Post
by themanintheseersuckersuit » Wed May 25, 2011 4:19 pm
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/25/nyreg ... ted=1&_r=1
She was almost certainly the last link to New York’s Gilded Age, reared in Beaux-Arts splendor in a 121-room Fifth Avenue mansion awash in Rembrandt, Donatello, Rubens and Degas. Her father, a copper baron who once bought himself a United States Senate seat as casually as another man might buy a pair of shoes, had been born before the Mexican War. Her six siblings died long before her, one in the 19th century.
By the late 1930s, Mrs. Clark had disappeared from the society pages. Most if not all of her siblings had died; she lived with her mother at 907 Fifth Avenue, painting and playing the harp. Her mother died there in 1963.
For the quarter-century that followed, Mrs. Clark lived in the apartment in near solitude, amid a profusion of dollhouses and their occupants. She ate austere lunches of crackers and sardines and watched television, most avidly “The Flintstones.” A housekeeper kept the dolls’ dresses impeccably ironed.
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
-
ulysses5019
- Purveyor of Avatars
- Posts: 19442
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
#2
Post
by ulysses5019 » Wed May 25, 2011 4:52 pm
themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/25/nyreg ... ted=1&_r=1
She was almost certainly the last link to New York’s Gilded Age, reared in Beaux-Arts splendor in a 121-room Fifth Avenue mansion awash in Rembrandt, Donatello, Rubens and Degas. Her father, a copper baron who once bought himself a United States Senate seat as casually as another man might buy a pair of shoes, had been born before the Mexican War. Her six siblings died long before her, one in the 19th century.
By the late 1930s, Mrs. Clark had disappeared from the society pages. Most if not all of her siblings had died; she lived with her mother at 907 Fifth Avenue, painting and playing the harp. Her mother died there in 1963.
For the quarter-century that followed, Mrs. Clark lived in the apartment in near solitude, amid a profusion of dollhouses and their occupants. She ate austere lunches of crackers and sardines and watched television, most avidly “The Flintstones.” A housekeeper kept the dolls’ dresses impeccably ironed.
I wonder if she watched Oprah too?
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.
-
themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
#3
Post
by themanintheseersuckersuit » Tue Nov 29, 2011 7:56 am
NEW YORK – A newly publicized will by an heiress to a Montana copper mining fortune leaves most of her $400 million estate to her family, while a will signed just weeks later left nothing to relatives.
The childless Huguette Clark died in May at age 104 -- a last breath of New York's Gilded Age that produced the Rockefellers, Astors and Vanderbilts.
Her relatives brought the new will to light on Monday: They filed court papers asking a Surrogate's Court judge to involve them in proceedings about how her money was spent -- and by whom -- while she was alive.
Read more:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/11/28/ne ... z1f6QC1mFt
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
-
silverscreenselect
- Posts: 24669
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
-
Contact:
#4
Post
by silverscreenselect » Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:43 am
themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:NEW YORK – A newly publicized will by an heiress to a Montana copper mining fortune leaves most of her $400 million estate to her family, while a will signed just weeks later left nothing to relatives.
A probate dispute!!!!
Sounds like like a job for the Michigan court system. By the time they get through with it, instead of $400 million, there will be about $40 to distribute to the lucky winners.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
-
Spock
- Posts: 4860
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:01 pm
#5
Post
by Spock » Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:04 am
>>>Her father, a copper baron who once bought himself a United States Senate seat as casually as another man might buy a pair of shoes, had been born before the Mexican War. Her six siblings died long before her, one in the 19th century. <<<
I am 45 and my paternal line great-grandfather was born in 1849 or 1850 in Wisconsin. I am too lazy to look and see if the Mexican War was still going on-I think it was. I have always thought it kind of neat that the generations to get to him are a lot more stretched out than normal to reach a Great-Grandparent. He was 53 or so when my Grandpa was born (1902) and Grandpa was 39 when Dad was born (1942). Dad was 24 when I was born(1966).
-
Cleopatra
- Merry Man
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 1:16 pm
- Location: At a casino near you!
#6
Post
by Cleopatra » Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:31 am
This is where Clark County, Nevada gets its name. Quite the interesting family!
My riches can be yours!
-
TheMichiganBarAssociation
- Merry Man
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:04 am
- Location: Kangaroo Court
#7
Post
by TheMichiganBarAssociation » Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:39 am
silverscreenselect wrote:themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:NEW YORK – A newly publicized will by an heiress to a Montana copper mining fortune leaves most of her $400 million estate to her family, while a will signed just weeks later left nothing to relatives.
A probate dispute!!!!
Sounds like like a job for the Michigan court system. By the time they get through with it, instead of $400 million, there will be about $40 to distribute to the lucky winners.
That's a little optimistic, don't you think? After all, it's office holiday party season!
---Dewey, Cheatham & Howe and Bob, Attorneys at Law
-
themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
#8
Post
by themanintheseersuckersuit » Sun Jun 17, 2012 4:41 pm
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
-
smilergrogan
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:22 pm
- Location: under a big W
#9
Post
by smilergrogan » Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:52 pm
Her father, a copper baron who once bought himself a United States Senate seat
Well, Huguette what you pay for.
-
themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
#10
Post
by themanintheseersuckersuit » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:35 pm
More Litigation
A lawsuit filed Thursday by New York City's public administrator's office on behalf of her estate seeks $100 million from Beth Israel Medical Center and Dr. Henry Singman. It contends that they allowed Clark to live at the hospital for 20 years until she died there, even though there was no medical need for hospitalization most of that time, in order to obtain millions of dollars in rent payments, fees and gifts, reports the Associated Press.
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ ... =daily_rss
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.