John McCain--is he eligible?

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Message
Author
User avatar
NellyLunatic1980
Posts: 7935
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:54 am
Contact:

John McCain--is he eligible?

#1 Post by NellyLunatic1980 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:15 am

I never realized it until this morning, but Sen. McCain was not born in the United States. He was born on an American Air Force base in the Panama Canal Zone.

Can he legally be president?

It's a very interesting constitutional debate.

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4884
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

#2 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:17 am

Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.

I think that mean clones can't be President. :lol:
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
Rexer25
It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
Posts: 2899
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Just this side of nowhere

#3 Post by Rexer25 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:26 am

TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.

I think that mean clones can't be President. :lol:
So in-vitro babies are out of the question?
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!

That'll be $10, please.

User avatar
ClonedKitty
Merry Man
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:07 am
Location: The genetics lab

#4 Post by ClonedKitty » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:35 am

TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.

I think that mean clones can't be President. :lol:

This is outrageous, and no laughing matter! We clones have you humans outnumbered, you know....

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4884
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

#5 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:38 am

Rexer25 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.

I think that mean clones can't be President. :lol:
So in-vitro babies are out of the question?
Aren't in-vitro babies natural born? They just aren't "natural conceived," right?

I'm pretty sure the USSCT would hold that the phrase "Natural Born Citizen" means "citizen by birth" as opposed to "naturalized citizen" so in-vitro fertilization would not pose a serious Constitutional Crisis.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
Rexer25
It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
Posts: 2899
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Just this side of nowhere

#6 Post by Rexer25 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:41 am

TheCalvinator24 wrote:
Rexer25 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.

I think that mean clones can't be President. :lol:
So in-vitro babies are out of the question?
Aren't in-vitro babies natural born? They just aren't "natural conceived," right?
If the in-vitro process results in a multiple pregnancy, they are usually delivered by C-section. Is that natural born?


Honestly, I don't think it's an issue in any way. It's just too early to be a real good smart-alec.

I'm pretty sure the USSCT would hold that the phrase "Natural Born Citizen" means "citizen by birth" as opposed to "naturalized citizen" so in-vitro fertilization would not pose a serious Constitutional Crisis.[/quote]
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!

That'll be $10, please.

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7631
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

#7 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:47 am

Sort of like "No man of woman born"

Macduff for President
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27033
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

#8 Post by Bob Juch » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:48 am

This will be the first Presidential contest between two people who were not born in the continental U.S.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
earendel
Posts: 13855
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
Location: mired in the bureaucracy

#9 Post by earendel » Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:50 am

Bob Juch wrote:This will be the first Presidential contest between two people who were not born in the continental U.S.
Hillary wasn't born in the continental U.S.? :)
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."

User avatar
NellyLunatic1980
Posts: 7935
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:54 am
Contact:

#10 Post by NellyLunatic1980 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:31 am

earendel wrote:Hillary wasn't born in the continental U.S.? :)
There's an obvious joke there, but I won't say it. :wink:

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3768
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

#11 Post by Appa23 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:35 am

TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.
It is about time that we find that portion of the Constitution as archaic and amend it.
:x

User avatar
AnnieCamaro
Four-Footer
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Rainbow Bridge

#12 Post by AnnieCamaro » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:38 am

Appa23 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.
It is about time that we find that portion of the Constitution as archaic and amend it.
:x
Let's go ahead and get those "Princess Peanut for President" signs printed, too.
Sou iu koto de.

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3768
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

#13 Post by Appa23 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:41 am

AnnieCamaro wrote:
Appa23 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.
It is about time that we find that portion of the Constitution as archaic and amend it.
:x
Let's go ahead and get those "Princess Peanut for President" signs printed, too.
How about "Let's Hear it for The Boy"? :)

User avatar
Ahnuld Schwartzwhatever
Merry Man
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:39 am

#14 Post by Ahnuld Schwartzwhatever » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:42 am

Appa23 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.
It is about time that we find that portion of the Constitution as archaic and amend it.
:x
Ya, ve must make thees great countri a playce where a rich steroid freak can buy his way into positions of great political powur.
Hasta la vista, babi

User avatar
earendel
Posts: 13855
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
Location: mired in the bureaucracy

#15 Post by earendel » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:44 am

Appa23 wrote:
AnnieCamaro wrote:
Appa23 wrote: It is about time that we find that portion of the Constitution as archaic and amend it.
:x
Let's go ahead and get those "Princess Peanut for President" signs printed, too.
How about "Let's Hear it for The Boy"? :)
Sounds like a ready-made campaign theme song.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."

User avatar
CharlesFoxSingers
Merry Man
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: At the mic

You asked for it....

#16 Post by CharlesFoxSingers » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:48 am

My baby, he don't talk sweet
He ain't got much to say
But he loves me, loves me, loves me
I know that he loves me anyway

And maybe he don't dress fine
But I don't really mind
'Cuz every time he pulls me near
I just wanna cheer:

Let's hear it for the boy!
Oh, let's give the boy a hand
Let's hear it for my baby
You gotta understand
Maybe he's no Romeo
But he's my loving one-man show
Let's hear it for the boy!

My baby may not be rich
He's watching every dime
But every night he holds me
And we always have a real good time

And maybe he sings off-key
That's all right by me
But what he does, he does so well
Makes me wanna yell:

Let's hear it for the boy!
Oh, let's give the boy a hand
Let's hear it for my baby
You gotta understand
Maybe he's no Romeo
But he's my loving one-man show
Let's hear it for the boy!

User avatar
HelpBrainTumorPatients
Merry Man
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:57 pm
Location: A Google link above the Bored

#17 Post by HelpBrainTumorPatients » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:55 am

Ahnuld Schwartzwhatever wrote:
Appa23 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.
It is about time that we find that portion of the Constitution as archaic and amend it.
:x
Ya, ve must make thees great countri a playce where a rich steroid freak can buy his way into positions of great political powur.

There, there, Ahnuld, I'm here to help. I can't do much for you since most people on this Bored send their money to Oral B. Roberts instead of our organization, but you're a pretty hopeless case anyway....

User avatar
hermillion
Bored Millionaire
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:21 pm
Location: Virginia

#18 Post by hermillion » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:58 am

My two brothers and I were all born on US military installations during the 50s - two in Japan, one in Germany. Instead of birth certificates, our parents were given Certificate(s) of Birth to American Parents Abroad. When oldest brother enlisted in the Navy in 1973, he was required to go through the naturalization process. The thinking at the time was that the Certificate stated that US citizens had a child, NOT that said child was a citizen. This nonsense went on for a while, until TPTB figured out that there were an awful lot of us with these certificates and that it was going to be a bureacratic nightmare if we all needed to be naturalized. The decision was made that we were, in fact, citizens. Just ones who had been born on foreign soil.

"Hermillion in '12" has a nice ring, don't you think?
"If you think in terms of a year, plant a seed; if in terms of ten years, plant a tree; if in terms of a hundred years, teach the people." - Confucious

"Who dares to teach must never cease to learn." -- John Cotton Dana

User avatar
AnnieCamaro
Four-Footer
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Rainbow Bridge

#19 Post by AnnieCamaro » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:58 am

Appa23 wrote:
AnnieCamaro wrote:
How about "Let's Hear it for The Boy"? :)
I don't mind if The Boy becomes president, too, but I'm a girl, so sometimes I'm all about Girl Power. I don't get to vote, though, because I'm not old enough, even though I'm mature for my age.
Sou iu koto de.

User avatar
Barack_Obama
Merry Man
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

#20 Post by Barack_Obama » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:11 am

"Hermillion in '12" has a nice ring, don't you think?
Girl, don't even think about it!!
Yes, we can!!

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#21 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:11 am

Appa23 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.
It is about time that we find that portion of the Constitution as archaic and amend it.
:x
I am fine with it being as it is.

I wouldn't want somebody like Arnold being my president.

User avatar
Rexer25
It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
Posts: 2899
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Just this side of nowhere

#22 Post by Rexer25 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:12 am

PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:
Appa23 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Non-issue. He is a Natural Born Citizen, not a Naturalized Citizen. The Constitution does not say that to be eligible one must have been born within the Geographical Boundaries of the several states. It says that one must be a Natural Born Citizen.
It is about time that we find that portion of the Constitution as archaic and amend it.
:x
I am fine with it being as it is.

I wouldn't want somebody like Arnold being my president.
So someone like George is OK with you?
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!

That'll be $10, please.

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#23 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:12 am

I didn't even want him as governor.

He's totally messing with the schools and they are cutting the budgets again.

He doesn't care because his kids go to private school.

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#24 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:13 am

Rexer25 wrote:
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:
Appa23 wrote: It is about time that we find that portion of the Constitution as archaic and amend it.
:x
I am fine with it being as it is.

I wouldn't want somebody like Arnold being my president.
So someone like George is OK with you?
I didn't vote for George, so no.

slam
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:10 pm

#25 Post by slam » Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:24 am

There was an article in the NY Times this morning about McCain's eligibility. It said that his team had researched it before his previous presidential run and again before this one. They had come to the conclusion that he was very safe on this issue. He was born to American parents on a US military base.

The article also mentioned some other historical situations. Barry Goldwater was born in Arizona, but 3 years prior to it becoming a state. The consensus was that he was eligibile. Chester Arthur was born in VT, but there were a number of rumors around that he had actually been born just over the border in Canada. Obviously, he became president. There was one other person who ran unsuccessfully for president (memory fails me right now) who was born in Paris but to US citizen parents. It was generally agreed at the time that he was eligible also.

Post Reply