Iowa

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Message
Author
User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#26 Post by peacock2121 » Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:21 pm

D'uh!

Of course!

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7631
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

#27 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:43 pm

So I'm watching Hucks victory speech and I recognized Chuck Norris and I thought the guy on the left side of the screen looked familiar and sure enough it was our ex governor David Beasley. Beasley hails from this part of the woods. Pious but not particularly competent governor.
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
andrewjackson
Posts: 3945
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
Location: Planet 10

#28 Post by andrewjackson » Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:45 pm

peacock2121 wrote:What if you can see one house before you cut the corn?
One house directly across the road and it is still rural. More than that, urban.

In rural areas you shouldn't be able to see anything other than corn until you cut the corn.

From the yard in front of my parent's house we could see the water towers of three towns but only one other house from about June until November. That's rural.
No matter where you go, there you are.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#29 Post by peacock2121 » Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:17 pm

I can't see another house no matter what the season.

If we weren't on a side of a mountain, I still wouldn't see them because of large trees.

Sting likes it because he gets to pee outside.

User avatar
Sir_Galahad
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:47 pm
Location: In The Heartland

#30 Post by Sir_Galahad » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:30 pm

Well, no real surprises. I hit the Obama, Edwards, Clinton trifecta and the Huckster / Romney exacta but no real money on those payoffs.

I think that if Obama beats Clinton again in NH, it could (spelled C-O-U-L-D) spell trouble for Hillary. People who on the fence waiting to jump on the stronger candidate may start to see that she is not the favorite after all and jump on Obama's bandwagon. I think it's time for Edwards to pack it in. I don't see him with a shot to win any state right now. It's a two-horse finish to wire. Obama could be country-wide fan favorite and with Hillary's negatives so high, this could spell DOOM for the junior senator from New York.

On the other side, Romney needs to do well in NH in order to stay viable. The only other state I see the Huckster a force in would be here in SC. I am hoping that Thompson gives a better performance though. I am looking to Florida to see see how well Rudy does in the first state he is gunning for. It's still a pretty wide open race on this side and it will be interesting, for sure.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke

Perhaps the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about...

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4884
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

#31 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:01 pm

Sir_Galahad wrote:The only other state I see the Huckster a force in would be here in SC.
I have heard many people say that, but in several states, Huckabee has been leading or closing.

4 points down in Florida
Leading in Georgia
2 points down in Illinois
2 points down in Michigan
Leading in Montana
Leading in Oklahoma
Leading in South Carolina
6 points down in Wisconsin
Leading in Texas

And note that all these polls were taken BEFORE the win in Iowa.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
mrkelley23
Posts: 6514
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: Somewhere between Bureaucracy and Despair

#32 Post by mrkelley23 » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:10 pm

I seem to recall a discussion about Giuliani earlier, and me confidently stating that he could not win Indiana.

I know Indiana is extremely unlikely to have an impact on the Republican nomination, but there is no doubt in my mind that Huckabee most definitely could win here.

Unfortunately (for him and other Republicans) this looks like the first year since 1964 that Indiana might actually vote Democratic in the presidential election.
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled. -- Richard Feynman

Post Reply