Article on local J! champion
- gsabc
- Posts: 6489
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
- Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
- Contact:
Article on local J! champion
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articl ... ins_again/
I like the discussion on the FJ betting strategy. Sounds like a contender in this year's tournament.
I like the discussion on the FJ betting strategy. Sounds like a contender in this year's tournament.
I just ordered chicken and an egg from Amazon. I'll let you know.
- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27965
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: Article on local J! champion
gsabc wrote:I like the discussion on the FJ betting strategy. Sounds like a contender in this year's tournament.
Spoiler
That was a gutsy move for the leader to bet small! Does this count as a win for your Conjecture, Bob?
And I was surprised that FJ was a triple-stumper. With such an weird question, how could it be anything but the obvious answer?
And I was surprised that FJ was a triple-stumper. With such an weird question, how could it be anything but the obvious answer?
- NellyLunatic1980
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:54 am
- Contact:
- gsabc
- Posts: 6489
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
- Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
- Contact:
- TheConfessor
- Posts: 6462
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm
Today's J! show was worth watching, if you like train wrecks. I think anyone who hopes to be a contestant ought to study this episode as an example of how easily things can go wrong. Knowing when not to ring in is just as important as knowing when to ring in.
There was also some horrible wagering on FJ.
There was also some horrible wagering on FJ.
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22001
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: Article on local J! champion
MarleysGh0st wrote:gsabc wrote:I like the discussion on the FJ betting strategy. Sounds like a contender in this year's tournament.Spoiler
That was a gutsy move for the leader to bet small! Does this count as a win for your Conjecture, Bob?
And I was surprised that FJ was a triple-stumper. With such an weird question, how could it be anything but the obvious answer?
Spoiler
Yes. Whether a game counts as a win for my Conjecture, though, is independent of the leader's actual bet. To determine the Conjecture's success or failure, one needs to compare a leader's hypothetical bet that's consistent with my Conjecture with a second hypothetical bet equal to the traditional shut-out bet.
In this case, if he had made the substantially larger wager that my Conjecture recommends, he still would have won, but if he had made the traditional shut-out bet, he'd have lost. That's why the game is a win for my Conjecture.
In this case, if he had made the substantially larger wager that my Conjecture recommends, he still would have won, but if he had made the traditional shut-out bet, he'd have lost. That's why the game is a win for my Conjecture.
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- VAdame
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:42 am
- Location: da 'Burgh!
Today's J! show was worth watching, if you like train wrecks. I think anyone who hopes to be a contestant ought to study this episode as an example of how easily things can go wrong. Knowing when not to ring in is just as important as knowing when to ring in.
Spoiler
Holy crap! Alex tried to make her feel better by telling her "Oh, you were just up against 2 guys who were quick on the button.....etc." No! She was plenty quick on the button -- she just kept giving wrong answers! You don't get $6000 in the hole by not ringing in!
BTW -- I knew FJ -- don't know how I knew it; apparently I read it somewhere a long time ago & it floated up to my brain when needed.

BTW -- I knew FJ -- don't know how I knew it; apparently I read it somewhere a long time ago & it floated up to my brain when needed.