Kazoo65 wrote:
The first guy (the computer geek) made a big mistake when he went right to the 4th grade math question. I think the best strategy for this game (as the rocket scientist is demonstrating) is to start at the bottom of the board and work up.
If you are as dumb as a rock when it comes to general trivia it might be the best strategy but I still think if you have a good trivia knowledge and some basic intelligence you might be better served taking on the harder questions early when you still have some "cheats" and saving the lower questions for last if possible. A lot depends on the subjects and of course knowing that the kids answers are as reliable going to Paul Lynde to block complicates it a bit. Also would depend a bit on the categories. I am terrible at grammar for example. But while I am not a math teacher I had no problem with the math question. Indeed, the math questions on thisshow tend to be grossly over valued and they seem to depend on the tendency of many people to panic on math questions which are generally pretty easy, what ever level they appear.
And of course I am not sure there is truly a lot of consistency in the difficulty of the questions by level. I have seen nights when the so called first grade question was as hard as anything up there.
But if I were playing I would probably go for the subjects I felt most comfortable with first, without regard for the level. The Supreme Court Q was a good example. I believe it was a 5th grade level Q but was not particularly hard for anybody with a little trivia game experience. The kids response on that question had to be a plant. Five different answers, all not only wrong but not even close? I don't think so!
But to each his own. Although the "rocket scientist" is working from the bottom up he seemed to be doing pretty well and could probably have started in the middle first if he wanted to, while the IT geek seemed out of his league no matter what the category or level. "Llama"ing out on the first question once could be an aberration, doing it twice suggests a deeper problem...