Was Bush always this bad at press conferences?

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Message
Author
User avatar
dimmzy
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:23 am

Was Bush always this bad at press conferences?

#1 Post by dimmzy » Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:24 am

Just happened to tune in ... it's like Jimmy Stewart showed up ... stuttering, deer in the headlights, avoiding the questions.

I think he's having an emotional meltdown.

The presidency must be getting to him ... just like with us.

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#2 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:25 am

The man has always been an idiot.

I take comfort in knowing that I never voted for him.

User avatar
earendel
Posts: 13857
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
Location: mired in the bureaucracy

Re: Was Bush always this bad at press conferences?

#3 Post by earendel » Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:29 am

dimmzy wrote:Just happened to tune in ... it's like Jimmy Stewart showed up ... stuttering, deer in the headlights, avoiding the questions.

I think he's having an emotional meltdown.

The presidency must be getting to him ... just like with us.
Leaving aside personal opinion about the president, he has never been known as a gifted orator. At times he can be good enough, but extemporaneous speaking is not his strong suit by any means.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."

User avatar
NellyLunatic1980
Posts: 7935
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:54 am
Contact:

#4 Post by NellyLunatic1980 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:46 am

No other man in presidential history can talk so much without ever actually saying anything.

User avatar
mrkelley23
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: Somewhere between Bureaucracy and Despair

#5 Post by mrkelley23 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:50 am

Yes.
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled. -- Richard Feynman

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#6 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:41 am

See, this is like asking was Bubba always a womanizer and an adulterer?

We knew it when we elected him and we knew of Dubya's difficulty with public speaking and pronunciation when we elected him.

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#7 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:10 am

peacock2121 wrote:We knew it when we elected him and we knew of Dubya's difficulty with public speaking and pronunciation when we elected him.
I didn't elect him. :)

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#8 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:22 am

PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:
peacock2121 wrote:We knew it when we elected him and we knew of Dubya's difficulty with public speaking and pronunciation when we elected him.
I didn't elect him. :)
Oh, but we did. You voted and he got elected - we elected him. That is the way our government works. You may not have voted for him and we elected him.

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#9 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:26 am

I love hearing my mother talk about Bush. She voted for him and even worked on his campaign.

She bitches about him all of the time now.

User avatar
megaaddict
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:39 am
Location: mega-rehab

Re: Was Bush always this bad at press conferences?

#10 Post by megaaddict » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:28 am

Yes, he's always done poorly, but despite eight years of experience, he's apparently getting worse at it.

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#11 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:30 am

I have seen comments made in gossip columns that he might be drinking again.

The job is enough to make anyone drink.

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3768
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

#12 Post by Appa23 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:31 am

PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:I have seen comments made in gossip columns that he might be drinking again.

The job is enough to make anyone drink.
Another tmz.com story, no doubt.

User avatar
dimmzy
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:23 am

Re: Was Bush always this bad at press conferences?

#13 Post by dimmzy » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:35 am

megaaddict wrote:Yes, he's always done poorly, but despite eight years of experience, he's apparently getting worse at it.
YES! That's what I find amazing! He never learns!

Oh wait, we didn't either ...

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#14 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:38 am

Appa23 wrote:
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:I have seen comments made in gossip columns that he might be drinking again.

The job is enough to make anyone drink.
Another tmz.com story, no doubt.
Actually, Ted Casablancas.

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3768
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

#15 Post by Appa23 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:44 am

PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:
Appa23 wrote:
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:I have seen comments made in gossip columns that he might be drinking again.

The job is enough to make anyone drink.
Another tmz.com story, no doubt.
Actually, Ted Casablancas.
Isn't that the guy on E!?

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#16 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:47 am

Appa23 wrote:
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:
Appa23 wrote: Another tmz.com story, no doubt.
Actually, Ted Casablancas.
Isn't that the guy on E!?
Yes, he has a daily column.

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

#17 Post by ne1410s » Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:49 pm

Actually, wasn't he elected once and appointed once?

I'm just saying...
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#18 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:51 pm

ne1410s wrote:Actually, wasn't he elected once and appointed once?

I'm just saying...
Even if I go with that way of saying it..... we elected him after we had 4 years of him
Spoiler
after
he was appointed.

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3768
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

#19 Post by Appa23 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:58 pm

ne1410s wrote:Actually, wasn't he elected once and appointed once?

I'm just saying...
I wonder if in 2027 there still be be people whining and refusing to accept that Gore/Lieberman lost.

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#20 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:08 pm

Appa23 wrote:
ne1410s wrote:Actually, wasn't he elected once and appointed once?

I'm just saying...
I wonder if in 2027 there still be be people whining and refusing to accept that Gore/Lieberman lost.
Just imagine if the Supreme Court had gone the other way, after all, Gore did win the popular vote.

How many people would still be alive? The people in the Twin Towers? The soldiers who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan? Innocent Iraqi civilians caught in the crossfire?

To their families it made have made a huge difference.

User avatar
gsabc
Posts: 6489
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
Contact:

#21 Post by gsabc » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:11 pm

Appa23 wrote:
ne1410s wrote:Actually, wasn't he elected once and appointed once?

I'm just saying...
I wonder if in 2027 there still be be people whining and refusing to accept that Gore/Lieberman lost.
Depends if in 2027 Iraq is a terrorist sanctuary and Tel Aviv is a radioactive hole from an Iranian nuke ...
I just ordered chicken and an egg from Amazon. I'll let you know.

User avatar
silvercamaro
Dog's Best Friend
Posts: 9608
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am

#22 Post by silvercamaro » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:14 pm

PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote: Just imagine if the Supreme Court had gone the other way, after all, Gore did win the popular vote.

How many people would still be alive? The people in the Twin Towers? The soldiers who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan? Innocent Iraqi civilians caught in the crossfire?

To their families it made have made a huge difference.
Or, how many more of us would be dead? To our families it would make a huge difference. We simply do not know what the alternative consequences would have been.

I sometimes listen to Bush and shake my head. Then I remember the other candidates, and think, "Oh. Never mind."



[/quote]

User avatar
Rexer25
It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
Posts: 2899
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Just this side of nowhere

Top 1 list of George W. Bush's Presidency:

#23 Post by Rexer25 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:15 pm

1. He made his father's term of office look not so bad.
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!

That'll be $10, please.

User avatar
mrkelley23
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: Somewhere between Bureaucracy and Despair

#24 Post by mrkelley23 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:16 pm

To answer Appa's question, I imagine it will be much as it is today: the vast majority of folks convinced that those who think Gore won are just a bunch of discontented whiners.

Serious students of history, however, may very well ferret out the serious voting irregularities in Florida and Ohio. The consensus may even be, among scholars, that the election of 2000 went the wrong way.

Ridiculous, you say? Check out the election of 1876 for parallels, right down to Florida being the crucial state.
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled. -- Richard Feynman

User avatar
Rexer25
It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
Posts: 2899
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Just this side of nowhere

#25 Post by Rexer25 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:22 pm

...
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:
How many people would still be alive? The people in the Twin Towers?
...

I think the Sept. 11 attacks would have happened, no matter who was in office. Unless G.W. Bush had died suddenly upon taking office. Then there would be two smoking, glowing devastated areas where Baghdad and Tehran used to be.
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!

That'll be $10, please.

Post Reply