Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
clem21
Nose Exploder
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: Got the New York City Rhythm

Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#1 Post by clem21 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:08 pm

So I'm writing a piece for the newspaper about student-teacher relationships and in my research I've come to a recent ruling by Washington state that a relationship between any teacher and any student over 18 is legal.

There was a very strong reaction to this and my attempts to look into it further have become murky so my question is:
Is it illegal in other states for a teacher to have a consensual relationship with an above-18 student and what are the laws regarding sexual advances made(Not Unwanted) between those parties?
"Some people never go crazy, What truly horrible lives they must live..."
-Charles Bukowski

2011 [Bleep]house Rats Award Winner
2011 I've Been Everywhere New England Region Co-Champion

User avatar
sunflower
Bored Hooligan
Posts: 8010
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
Location: East Hartford, CT

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#2 Post by sunflower » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:09 pm

I don't know anything about the laws in any states...but I would think that most schools would have policies banning those types of relationships.

User avatar
clem21
Nose Exploder
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: Got the New York City Rhythm

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#3 Post by clem21 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:13 pm

sunflower wrote:I don't know anything about the laws in any states...but I would think that most schools would have policies banning those types of relationships.
Surprisingly not. Most colleges "discourage" them but very few actually prohibit if it's consensual.
"Some people never go crazy, What truly horrible lives they must live..."
-Charles Bukowski

2011 [Bleep]house Rats Award Winner
2011 I've Been Everywhere New England Region Co-Champion

User avatar
sunflower
Bored Hooligan
Posts: 8010
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
Location: East Hartford, CT

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#4 Post by sunflower » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:22 pm

clem21 wrote:
sunflower wrote:I don't know anything about the laws in any states...but I would think that most schools would have policies banning those types of relationships.
Surprisingly not. Most colleges "discourage" them but very few actually prohibit if it's consensual.
Oh colleges...I was thinking high school, with kids who turn 18 while they're still there. Oh, I had lots of friends who dated professors in college. And in some cases I use the term "dated" very, very loosely. :twisted:

User avatar
SportsFan68
No Scritches!!!
Posts: 21300
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#5 Post by SportsFan68 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:25 pm

From an HR point of view --
Is it illegal in other states for a teacher to have a consensual relationship with an above-18 student and what are the laws regarding sexual advances made(Not Unwanted) between those parties?
It is not illegal in Colorado.

The laws regarding unwanted sexual advances are covered by established sexual harassment guidelines or in extreme cases by criminal law regarding stalking or even rape.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller

User avatar
christie1111
11:11
Posts: 11630
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:54 am
Location: CT

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#6 Post by christie1111 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:30 pm

Getting a little demanding there, aren't we?

Maybe please would help.

:D
"A bed without a quilt is like the sky without stars"

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#7 Post by Appa23 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:35 pm

I would guess that nearly every other state has this same loophole whereupon a teacher is not breaking the letter of the law by engaging in a voluntary carnal relationship with an 18 year-old student.

The issue is what is the age for a "minor".

User avatar
VAdame
Posts: 1877
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:42 am
Location: da 'Burgh!

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#8 Post by VAdame » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:44 pm

Newt Gingrich's first wife was his former high school geometry teacher. He was 19 and she was 26 when they married.

This is the wife he served with divorce papers while she was in the hospital being treated for breast cancer.

One of Leah's friends (age 22) dated one of their former middle school teachers recently! He's in his mid-30s now -- 10 years ago he was the brand-new handsome young guy teacher all the girls had crushes on. 10 years ago he was also married, but he has since divorced.

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#9 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:46 pm

Texas law doesn't provide an exception for 18 year olds (or 17 year olds, which is the age of consent in Texas).

However, according to this article, Prosecutors have found it difficult to prevail in cases when the "victim" is 17 or 18 years old.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
clem21
Nose Exploder
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: Got the New York City Rhythm

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#10 Post by clem21 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:01 pm

christie1111 wrote:Getting a little demanding there, aren't we?

Maybe please would help.

:D
But assemble is so much more fun!

Also, since I'm such an inherently sweet and polite young person the politeness is a given.

And if you made Caress Evenly Gorgeous For Men I'd get it....So long as it's not as ridculously expensive as Axe. :wink:
"Some people never go crazy, What truly horrible lives they must live..."
-Charles Bukowski

2011 [Bleep]house Rats Award Winner
2011 I've Been Everywhere New England Region Co-Champion

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#11 Post by Appa23 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:04 pm

TheCalvinator24 wrote:Texas law doesn't provide an exception for 18 year olds (or 17 year olds, which is the age of consent in Texas).

However, according to this article, Prosecutors have found it difficult to prevail in cases when the "victim" is 17 or 18 years old.
Thanks for the info. I had not thought about there being a law specific to the teacher-student relationship, regardless of age.

User avatar
clem21
Nose Exploder
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: Got the New York City Rhythm

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#12 Post by clem21 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:09 pm

TheCalvinator24 wrote:Texas law doesn't provide an exception for 18 year olds (or 17 year olds, which is the age of consent in Texas).

However, according to this article, Prosecutors have found it difficult to prevail in cases when the "victim" is 17 or 18 years old.
This is very interesting and pertinent as many college freshman (including myself) can be 18 upon entrance to college. Any way I can find out if there is a similar law in New York State? Please.
"Some people never go crazy, What truly horrible lives they must live..."
-Charles Bukowski

2011 [Bleep]house Rats Award Winner
2011 I've Been Everywhere New England Region Co-Champion

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#13 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:11 pm

clem21 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Texas law doesn't provide an exception for 18 year olds (or 17 year olds, which is the age of consent in Texas).

However, according to this article, Prosecutors have found it difficult to prevail in cases when the "victim" is 17 or 18 years old.
This is very interesting and pertinent as many college freshman (including myself) can be 18 upon entrance to college. Any way I can find out if there is a similar law in New York State? Please.
The Texas law only applies to Teachers in Elementary and Secondary schools. It does not apply to colleges.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
clem21
Nose Exploder
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: Got the New York City Rhythm

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#14 Post by clem21 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:18 pm

TheCalvinator24 wrote:
clem21 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Texas law doesn't provide an exception for 18 year olds (or 17 year olds, which is the age of consent in Texas).

However, according to this article, Prosecutors have found it difficult to prevail in cases when the "victim" is 17 or 18 years old.
This is very interesting and pertinent as many college freshman (including myself) can be 18 upon entrance to college. Any way I can find out if there is a similar law in New York State? Please.
The Texas law only applies to Teachers in Elementary and Secondary schools. It does not apply to colleges.
Oh. I wonder why there's a difference there if the age is the same. Okay, interesting information nonetheless, so thanks.
"Some people never go crazy, What truly horrible lives they must live..."
-Charles Bukowski

2011 [Bleep]house Rats Award Winner
2011 I've Been Everywhere New England Region Co-Champion

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#15 Post by Appa23 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:51 pm

clem21 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Texas law doesn't provide an exception for 18 year olds (or 17 year olds, which is the age of consent in Texas).

However, according to this article, Prosecutors have found it difficult to prevail in cases when the "victim" is 17 or 18 years old.
This is very interesting and pertinent as many college freshman (including myself) can be 18 upon entrance to college. Any way I can find out if there is a similar law in New York State? Please.
I will give you a jump start on your computer research.

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/rpt/2007-R-0710.htm

User avatar
clem21
Nose Exploder
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: Got the New York City Rhythm

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#16 Post by clem21 » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:59 pm

Appa23 wrote:
clem21 wrote:
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Texas law doesn't provide an exception for 18 year olds (or 17 year olds, which is the age of consent in Texas).

However, according to this article, Prosecutors have found it difficult to prevail in cases when the "victim" is 17 or 18 years old.
This is very interesting and pertinent as many college freshman (including myself) can be 18 upon entrance to college. Any way I can find out if there is a similar law in New York State? Please.
I will give you a jump start on your computer research.

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/rpt/2007-R-0710.htm
This is awesome man, thank you so much!
"Some people never go crazy, What truly horrible lives they must live..."
-Charles Bukowski

2011 [Bleep]house Rats Award Winner
2011 I've Been Everywhere New England Region Co-Champion

User avatar
minimetoo26
Royal Pain In Everyone's Ass
Posts: 7874
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:51 am
Location: No Fixed Address

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#17 Post by minimetoo26 » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:52 am

Now I'm wondering if clem is being harrassed or if he's thinking about asking out one of his professors...







:P
Knowing a great deal is not the same as being smart; intelligence is not information alone but also judgment, the manner in which information is collected and used.

-Carl Sagan

User avatar
Charlie Brown's Teacher
Merry Man
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:40 pm
Location: Wah wah wah wah!

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#18 Post by Charlie Brown's Teacher » Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:55 am

clem21 wrote:So I'm writing a piece for the newspaper about student-teacher relationships and in my research I've come to a recent ruling by Washington state that a relationship between any teacher and any student over 18 is legal.

There was a very strong reaction to this and my attempts to look into it further have become murky so my question is:
Is it illegal in other states for a teacher to have a consensual relationship with an above-18 student and what are the laws regarding sexual advances made(Not Unwanted) between those parties?

Wah wah wah wah, wah wah-wah waaaaaah!

User avatar
andrewjackson
Posts: 3945
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
Location: Planet 10

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#19 Post by andrewjackson » Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:12 am

Here is the section of the Texas Penal Code:
Sec. 21.12. IMPROPER RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATOR AND STUDENT. (a) An employee of a public or private primary or secondary school commits an offense if the employee engages in:

(1) sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse with a person who is enrolled in a public or private primary or secondary school at which the employee works and who is not the employee's spouse; or

(2) conduct described by Section 33.021, with a person described by Subdivision (1), regardless of the age of that person.

(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the second degree.

(c) If conduct constituting an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under another section of this code, the actor may be prosecuted under either section or both sections.

(d) The name of a person who is enrolled in a public or private primary or secondary school and involved in an improper relationship with an educator as provided by Subsection (a) may not be released to the public and is not public information under Chapter 552, Government Code.
That 33.021 bit is ONLINE SOLICITATION OF A MINOR. It defines a minor as someone under the age of 17 but this clause removes that age restriction if the person fits subsection 1 of this section. So a school employee can't solicit sex from a student at their own school no matter the age of the student.

Unless the employee is married to the student.
No matter where you go, there you are.

User avatar
Ritterskoop
Posts: 5892
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:16 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#20 Post by Ritterskoop » Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:49 pm

I turned 17 two weeks before I started college. The subject did come up. Not in a genuinely legal way, but in an "I can't even talk to you about that" legal way.

From the teacher's perspective, I know now that the way to avoid such things is to say that school policy forbids it, and then you don't have to worry about the age of the student (laws vary from state to state, which I realize is the original question but I dunno the law here). When I was hired to teach, I asked the person who hired me what were the rules, and she said, "Wear clothes, and don't date the students."

Since then I've read the manual, and it is not forbidden to date or marry a student with whom you will never have a teaching relationship. Which is good, because if I ever meet anybody to end up with, it seems likely to be someone on campus that would fit the best.
If you fail to pilot your own ship, don't be surprised at what inappropriate port you find yourself docked. - Tom Robbins
--------
At the moment of commitment, the universe conspires to assist you. - attributed to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.

User avatar
wintergreen48
Posts: 2481
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 1:42 pm
Location: Resting comfortably in my comfy chair

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#21 Post by wintergreen48 » Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:53 pm

andrewjackson wrote:Here is the section of the Texas Penal Code:

I that that most sex crimes involve a Penal code.
Innocent, naive and whimsical. And somewhat footloose and fancy-free.

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#22 Post by TheConfessor » Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:33 pm

andrewjackson wrote:(1) sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse with a person who is enrolled in a public or private primary or secondary school at which the employee works and who is not the employee's spouse; or.
Is this redundant, or is there some way to have sexual intercourse without having sexual contact?

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#23 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:37 pm

TheConfessor wrote:
andrewjackson wrote:(1) sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse with a person who is enrolled in a public or private primary or secondary school at which the employee works and who is not the employee's spouse; or.
Is this redundant, or is there some way to have sexual intercourse without having sexual contact?
The terms are specifically defined in the penal code.
hidden because some of the language might offend
sexual intercourse is exclusively penile/vaginal penetration

sexual contact is "any touching of the anus, breast, or any part of the genitals of another person with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person."
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
andrewjackson
Posts: 3945
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
Location: Planet 10

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#24 Post by andrewjackson » Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:41 pm

TheCalvinator24 wrote:
TheConfessor wrote:
andrewjackson wrote:(1) sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse with a person who is enrolled in a public or private primary or secondary school at which the employee works and who is not the employee's spouse; or.
Is this redundant, or is there some way to have sexual intercourse without having sexual contact?
The terms are specifically defined in the penal code.
hidden because some of the language might offend
sexual intercourse is exclusively penile/vaginal penetration

sexual contact is "any touching of the anus, breast, or any part of the genitals of another person with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person."
I think the Confessor's point was that all you have to outlaw is sexual contact. That would, by definition, include intercourse.
No matter where you go, there you are.

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: Alright you law practicing attorney people. Assemble.

#25 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:43 pm

"sexual contact" requires the element of intent to arouse or satisfy sexual desire.

We've been told for years that "rape" is not about sex, but power, so the definition of "sexual intercourse" does not require the State to prove that the perpetrator was attempting to arouse of gratify anybody.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

Post Reply