One Trillion Dollars

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Sir_Galahad
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:47 pm
Location: In The Heartland

One Trillion Dollars

#1 Post by Sir_Galahad » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:15 am

Do you realize how much a trillion dollars really is?

You spend a million dollars a day from the First Christmas Day (yes, over 2,000 years ago) and you would still have money left.

It is equal to a stack of thousand dollar bills about 70 miles high.

It is almost incomprehensible.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke

Perhaps the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about...

User avatar
Jeemie
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!

Re: One Trillion Dollars

#2 Post by Jeemie » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:21 am

Yes- however, there are 6 billion people in the world.

And the world GDP is $54.62 trillion (well- it was in 2007- I'm sure it's much less, now).

That's only ~$25 per capita per day.

A lot of little numbers add up to a really big number very quickly.
1979 City of Champions 2009

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: One Trillion Dollars

#3 Post by MarleysGh0st » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:21 am

Any comparison to an individual makes it incomprehensible.

$3,333.33 per person, that's what it is.

User avatar
Jeemie
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!

Re: One Trillion Dollars

#4 Post by Jeemie » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:23 am

MarleysGh0st wrote:Any comparison to an individual makes it incomprehensible.

$3,333.33 per person, that's what it is.
Great minds think alike.

One of humanity's greatest failures is the inability to comprehend how a lot of little numbers add up to great big numbers in a big fat hurry.
1979 City of Champions 2009

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24617
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: One Trillion Dollars

#5 Post by silverscreenselect » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:28 am

If Doctor Evil launched a new extortion plot every day until the last Austin Powers movie gets made, the total amount of money he was demanding would equal one trillion dollars.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
danielh41
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:36 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Contact:

Re: One Trillion Dollars

#6 Post by danielh41 » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:29 am

One trillion is such a huge number. One trillion seconds would equal over 31,000 years (longer than recorded history)!

User avatar
SportsFan68
No Scritches!!!
Posts: 21300
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: One Trillion Dollars

#7 Post by SportsFan68 » Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:52 am

I tried to make that point in a Toastmasters speech once.

I started with the thickness of a piece of paper and still didn't have enough room for my listeners to imagine a trillion by the time my imaginary paper stack hit the ceiling.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller

User avatar
Obscenely Rich Bastard
Merry Man
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:25 am
Location: Atop a mountain of money

Re: One Trillion Dollars

#8 Post by Obscenely Rich Bastard » Fri Feb 06, 2009 1:09 pm

Sir_Galahad wrote:Do you realize how much a trillion dollars really is?

Yes I do.... my maid found that much in my pockets when she did the wash.....

User avatar
Flybrick
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:44 am

Re: One Trillion Dollars

#9 Post by Flybrick » Fri Feb 06, 2009 1:24 pm

Story from The Washington Times (a conservative leaning paper).

Figures and prediction is from the Congressional Budget Office, which is neither conservative or a paper, but Congress' own creature.
CBO: Obama stimulus harmful over long haul
Stephen Dinan (Contact)
Wednesday, February 4, 2009

President Obama's economic recovery package will actually hurt the economy more in the long run than if he were to do nothing, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday.

CBO, the official scorekeepers for legislation, said the House and Senate bills will help in the short term but result in so much government debt that within a few years they would crowd out private investment, actually leading to a lower Gross Domestic Product over the next 10 years than if the government had done nothing.

CBO estimates that by 2019 the Senate legislation would reduce GDP by 0.1 percent to 0.3 percent on net. [The House bill] would have similar long-run effects, CBO said in a letter to Sen. Judd Gregg, New Hampshire Republican, who was tapped by Mr. Obama on Tuesday to be Commerce Secretary.

The House last week passed a bill totaling about $820 billion while the Senate is working on a proposal reaching about $900 billion in spending increases and tax cuts.

But Republicans and some moderate Democrats have balked at the size of the bill and at some of the spending items included in it, arguing they won't produce immediate jobs, which is the stated goal of the bill.

The budget office had previously estimated service the debt due to the new spending could add hundreds of millions of dollars to the cost of the bill -- forcing the crowd-out.

CBOs basic assumption is that, in the long run, each dollar of additional debt crowds out about a third of a dollars worth of private domestic capital, CBO said in its letter.

CBO said there is no crowding out in the short term, so the plan would succeed in boosting growth in 2009 and 2010.

The agency projected the Senate bill would produce between 1.4 percent and 4.1 percent higher growth in 2009 than if there was no action. For 2010, the plan would boost growth by 1.2 percent to 3.6 percent.

CBO did project the bill would create jobs, though by 2011 the effects would be minuscule.

Post Reply