Last Night's Lost

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24617
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Last Night's Lost

#1 Post by silverscreenselect » Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:34 am

Spoiler
I knew Jin was still alive...... and I figured out who the group of people speaking French were very quickly. All things considered, it was a fairly low key episode, as a lot of the ones that try to keep track of the entire group at once are (as opposed to episodes that focus on just a few of them).

And is it just me or does it seem like the original Lostaways are the only group of people who have ever arrived on the island who haven't been armed to the teeth from minute one?
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Last Night's Lost

#2 Post by MarleysGh0st » Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:04 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
Spoiler
And is it just me or does it seem like the original Lostaways are the only group of people who have ever arrived on the island who haven't been armed to the teeth from minute one?
Spoiler
Well, there was Locke with his suitcase full of combat knives! :twisted:

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24617
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Last Night's Lost

#3 Post by silverscreenselect » Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:20 am

Ratings for Lost are down somewhat from last year, although nowhere near as bad as Heroes. Lost is in a very tough time slot right now. Fox's Lie to Me has finished ahead of Lost every week, despite losing a good bit from its American Idol leadin. Lost finished ahead of CBS Criminal Minds but only because the usually dominant Minds broadcast a repeat.

I'm somewhat surprised by Lie to Me. It's a gimmick show, but a good gimmick. A group of top investigators have the ability to read whether people are lying to them or not, based on verbal patterns, body language, and other psychological tells. Often, the show will illustrate the point by having star Tim Roth explain that a particular gesture indicates lying and then following it up immediately by showing a clip of a famous person (Bill Clinton, Richard Nixon, etc.) using the exact same gesture.

Once the team determines that a person is lying, the rest of the show is a fairly routine cops and robbers procedural in which they try to determine why the person is lying (which usually has something to do with the commission of a crime that needs to be solved). To make this last sixty minutes, they work on two cases per episode(much as CSI has done).

While the show's premise is interesting, I'm curious how they will find enough interesting material to keep it going for an entire season.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
SportsFan68
No Scritches!!!
Posts: 21300
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: Last Night's Lost

#4 Post by SportsFan68 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:22 am

silverscreenselect wrote: While the show's premise is interesting, I'm curious how they will find enough interesting material to keep it going for an entire season.
Probably the same thing the Lawns do -- read the headlines.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller

User avatar
secondchance
Possum Hunter!
Posts: 2346
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Last Night's Lost

#5 Post by secondchance » Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:24 am

We've been enjoying Lie To Me, and I find it pretty durned fascinating.

Tall son is getting nervous. It seems.

8)

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

Re: Last Night's Lost

#6 Post by tanstaafl2 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:49 am

Spoiler
Has it been discussed that the gun toting women from last weeks episode is likely Danny boys mother? I can't remember. Does that means he was born on the island? A union with Widmore perhaps...

Which suggests they still need to explain why people now can't get pregnant and be born here, a change that moust have happened in the intervening years.

I too was pretty sure Jin wasn't toast. Yet.

And it was equally clear to me right away that the Frenchies were Danielle and company. But are the doing all this for fun's sake? It wasn't as those Danielle appeared to recognize Jin 17 years (or how ever long it was) later. Of course back then they probably hadn't made up this story line!

They do seem to be doing a better job of making it up as they go along than Heroes although no doubt having a finish line helps.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24617
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Last Night's Lost

#7 Post by silverscreenselect » Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:14 pm

tanstaafl2 wrote:
Spoiler
And it was equally clear to me right away that the Frenchies were Danielle and company. But are the doing all this for fun's sake? It wasn't as those Danielle appeared to recognize Jin 17 years (or how ever long it was) later. Of course back then they probably hadn't made up this story line!
Spoiler
Towards the end of the show, Ben told Sun that he had proof that Jin was still alive on the island, and it may have something to do with the time Jin spent with the Frenchies (perhaps a photo of him with Danielle that Ben got hold of years later).
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
ghostjmf
Posts: 7452
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:09 am

Re: Last Night's Lost

#8 Post by ghostjmf » Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:40 pm

I was interested in "Lie", because I've known people who claim to be "body language" readers; to a person they are insufferable boors, are sure they are always always right about their "readings", & are frequently wrong. Often, they try to set a situation up by telling a subject "someone who is happy always picks their nose" or some such nonsense; then, if the subject picks their nose, they know the subject is at least trying to "appear happy".

Of course, giving a prompt & then seeing if its followed, as well as being very bad science, would be anathemic to criminal investigations (except when a wily investigator is intentionally setting someone up).


You could probably find better body language readers among professional poker players who play in "real life" (i.e. the people they're playing against are all in the same room at the same time as they are, as opposed to an on-line game, even one that uses Skype to get some kind of visual of the opponent(s)) & who win a lot. When interviewed, they always claim they base a lot of their playing on their opponents' "tells". The psychology professor "body language reader" & the "my life/income depends on this" "body language reader" rarely cross paths, & are rarely the same person.

I figured that making the main character an insufferable boor wouldn't last very long on TV crime drama (its often the case on comedies, one reason I don't find most comedies very funny). the Jaynes character on "The Mentalist" (who reads body language as well as pays very close attention to teeny details) is played as more of a boor than the character on "Lie"; "Mentalist" is a hit, I'd say, largely through Simon Baker managing to exude a lot of charm mixed in with the boorishness. Baker was an equally good actor on his previous network show, playing a (mostly recovering) cocaine addict with almost no affect, but who still made watchers want to care about him.

The boorishness aspect on "Lie" is taken care of by the main character being someone who
has memorized all his "body language reading" based on detailed studies he's made, having almost no natural talent at it. Of course, they've also thrown in a very non-boorish "natural" that the lead character is training to know the school-learning aspects too.

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

Re: Last Night's Lost

#9 Post by tanstaafl2 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:54 pm

silverscreenselect wrote:
tanstaafl2 wrote:
Spoiler
And it was equally clear to me right away that the Frenchies were Danielle and company. But are the doing all this for fun's sake? It wasn't as those Danielle appeared to recognize Jin 17 years (or how ever long it was) later. Of course back then they probably hadn't made up this story line!
Spoiler
Towards the end of the show, Ben told Sun that he had proof that Jin was still alive on the island, and it may have something to do with the time Jin spent with the Frenchies (perhaps a photo of him with Danielle that Ben got hold of years later).
Spoiler
Good point, although none of the people in the group who returned other than Ben know that the Losties left behind are currently in time travel hell (Other than Locke of course and he's dead. For the moment anyway). And photos these days are pretty easy to fake.

And just how long has it been since the freighter blew up anyway? As far as I can see Jin had no water (I suppose he could have been drinking rain water from the storm) and I have no idea how long it has been that they have been flitting about in time. I suppose not all that long although there sure has been a lot of hiking going on so at least a day or so in "real" time. In the tropics and in the sun constantly he wouldn't realistically last more than a day or two at most. Not that realism is always a key factor in this show...
Last edited by tanstaafl2 on Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
smilergrogan
Posts: 1529
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:22 pm
Location: under a big W

Re: Last Night's Lost

#10 Post by smilergrogan » Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:56 pm

silverscreenselect wrote:
tanstaafl2 wrote:
Spoiler
And it was equally clear to me right away that the Frenchies were Danielle and company. But are the doing all this for fun's sake? It wasn't as those Danielle appeared to recognize Jin 17 years (or how ever long it was) later. Of course back then they probably hadn't made up this story line!
Spoiler
Towards the end of the show, Ben told Sun that he had proof that Jin was still alive on the island, and it may have something to do with the time Jin spent with the Frenchies (perhaps a photo of him with Danielle that Ben got hold of years later).
Spoiler
It seems that it is the timeline of the person travelling through time that always takes precedence as far as who recognizes who, and the non-time traveller retains no memory of the encounter when he meets the time traveller again later in normal life. So Daniel didn't recognize Desmond upon meeting him on the island in 2004, even though he had encountered time travelling Desmond in 1996; at the same time, Desmond didn't recognize Daniel either when they met on the island, even though hatch-dwelling Desmond had encountered time-travelling Daniel several years earlier; and Ethan (maybe) didn't recognize Locke in the first season even though he had met time travelling Locke before. The older Danielle has no memory of Jin, because from Jin the soon-to-be time traveller's standpoint, they haven't met yet. Possibly the same for Locke seeming to have no memory of meeting Richard as a child.

It would be interesting if Ben had a photo of Jin and the younger Danielle together and had shown it to the older Danielle. I suppose she still wouldn't be able to remember meeting Jin.

Also am I right that every even-numbered flash always brings them back to the present time, i.e. the day the freighter blew up or following day or two? That would mean the outrigger boat people from last night arrived at that time (though they could be time travellers themselves, I guess). I wonder what the range of possible eras for the odd-numbered flashes is. Maybe limited by whenever the ship's tiller mechanism under the Orchid station was first established?

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: Last Night's Lost

#11 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:33 pm

smilergrogan wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
tanstaafl2 wrote:
Spoiler
And it was equally clear to me right away that the Frenchies were Danielle and company. But are the doing all this for fun's sake? It wasn't as those Danielle appeared to recognize Jin 17 years (or how ever long it was) later. Of course back then they probably hadn't made up this story line!
Spoiler
Towards the end of the show, Ben told Sun that he had proof that Jin was still alive on the island, and it may have something to do with the time Jin spent with the Frenchies (perhaps a photo of him with Danielle that Ben got hold of years later).
Spoiler
It seems that it is the timeline of the person travelling through time that always takes precedence as far as who recognizes who, and the non-time traveller retains no memory of the encounter when he meets the time traveller again later in normal life. So Daniel didn't recognize Desmond upon meeting him on the island in 2004, even though he had encountered time travelling Desmond in 1996; at the same time, Desmond didn't recognize Daniel either when they met on the island, even though hatch-dwelling Desmond had encountered time-travelling Daniel several years earlier; and Ethan (maybe) didn't recognize Locke in the first season even though he had met time travelling Locke before. The older Danielle has no memory of Jin, because from Jin the soon-to-be time traveller's standpoint, they haven't met yet. Possibly the same for Locke seeming to have no memory of meeting Richard as a child.

It would be interesting if Ben had a photo of Jin and the younger Danielle together and had shown it to the older Danielle. I suppose she still wouldn't be able to remember meeting Jin.

Also am I right that every even-numbered flash always brings them back to the present time, i.e. the day the freighter blew up or following day or two? That would mean the outrigger boat people from last night arrived at that time (though they could be time travellers themselves, I guess). I wonder what the range of possible eras for the odd-numbered flashes is. Maybe limited by whenever the ship's tiller mechanism under the Orchid station was first established?
Spoiler
I see one problem with your theory regarding memory and time-travel. Richard wasn't time-traveling when he tested Locke as a child. He went because Locke had told him to find him. Richard clearly remembered meeting the adult Locke in the 50s.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

Re: Last Night's Lost

#12 Post by tanstaafl2 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 3:34 pm

TheCalvinator24 wrote:
smilergrogan wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
Spoiler
Towards the end of the show, Ben told Sun that he had proof that Jin was still alive on the island, and it may have something to do with the time Jin spent with the Frenchies (perhaps a photo of him with Danielle that Ben got hold of years later).
Spoiler
It seems that it is the timeline of the person travelling through time that always takes precedence as far as who recognizes who, and the non-time traveller retains no memory of the encounter when he meets the time traveller again later in normal life. So Daniel didn't recognize Desmond upon meeting him on the island in 2004, even though he had encountered time travelling Desmond in 1996; at the same time, Desmond didn't recognize Daniel either when they met on the island, even though hatch-dwelling Desmond had encountered time-travelling Daniel several years earlier; and Ethan (maybe) didn't recognize Locke in the first season even though he had met time travelling Locke before. The older Danielle has no memory of Jin, because from Jin the soon-to-be time traveller's standpoint, they haven't met yet. Possibly the same for Locke seeming to have no memory of meeting Richard as a child.

It would be interesting if Ben had a photo of Jin and the younger Danielle together and had shown it to the older Danielle. I suppose she still wouldn't be able to remember meeting Jin.

Also am I right that every even-numbered flash always brings them back to the present time, i.e. the day the freighter blew up or following day or two? That would mean the outrigger boat people from last night arrived at that time (though they could be time travellers themselves, I guess). I wonder what the range of possible eras for the odd-numbered flashes is. Maybe limited by whenever the ship's tiller mechanism under the Orchid station was first established?
Spoiler
I see one problem with your theory regarding memory and time-travel. Richard wasn't time-traveling when he tested Locke as a child. He went because Locke had told him to find him. Richard clearly remembered meeting the adult Locke in the 50s.
Spoiler
Richard seems to be a rather unique occupant of the island so those "rules", should they in fact exist, don't seem to apply to him. He is rather like the civil service bureaucracy, unchanging (in more ways than one) no matter who is in charge.

Or may be that the ones that remember are the ones convenient for the writers to have remember to service a particular plot point.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Last Night's Lost

#13 Post by MarleysGh0st » Thu Feb 05, 2009 3:42 pm

I missed the explanation:
Spoiler
Why did Claire's mom happen to be in LA and talking to Ben's lawyer, since she didn't know anything about Aaron?

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

Re: Last Night's Lost

#14 Post by tanstaafl2 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 3:48 pm

smilergrogan wrote:
Spoiler
Also am I right that every even-numbered flash always brings them back to the present time, i.e. the day the freighter blew up or following day or two? That would mean the outrigger boat people from last night arrived at that time (though they could be time travellers themselves, I guess). I wonder what the range of possible eras for the odd-numbered flashes is. Maybe limited by whenever the ship's tiller mechanism under the Orchid station was first established?
Spoiler
I don't think that is correct. After the camp with Richard in the 1950's disappeared they flashed forward to the time of the light from the hatch right? Then they flashed forward again to the outriggers (camp there but abandoned). The time frame is uncertain here. Is it shortly after the freighter blew up or long after (Those beer cans looked like they had been there awhile!). Then they flashed yet again, this time back to the time when Daniele arrived. If there is a rhyme or reason to the flashes it doesn't seem clear to me yet.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24617
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Last Night's Lost

#15 Post by silverscreenselect » Thu Feb 05, 2009 3:54 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:I missed the explanation:
Spoiler
Why did Claire's mom happen to be in LA and talking to Ben's lawyer, since she didn't know anything about Aaron?
Spoiler
She was in LA to receive the settlement check from the plane crash (as Claire's presumed next of kin). Apparently, the attorney was representing her and some of the other relatives of other victims.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

Re: Last Night's Lost

#16 Post by tanstaafl2 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:00 pm

Also here is the dialogue of the French party if anyone is interested. It wasn't translated in CC so if you didn't know French you were SOL. Not that it was earth shattering, or even island shattering, in nature.


ROBERT: Mais je t'ai dit, on aurait dû jamais suivre ces maudits chiffres ! (I told you so! We never should have followed those damn numbers!)
MONTAND: Mais c'est pas ma faute, Robert. Brennan devait tenir le sonar! (It's not my fault, Robert. Brennan was in charge of the sonar!)
BRENNAN: Mais je le faisais, Montand! Je vous l'ai déja dit, les instruments ont mal fonctionné! (I was watching, Montand! I told you already, the instruments malfunctioned!)
ROUSSEAU: Un homme à la mer! (Man overboard!)
(Man) Quoi? (What?)
Mais je pensais qu'on était tous là! (I thought we were all there!)
On est tous là ! Il est pas des nôtres. Alors qui est-ce? (We ARE all here! He's not one of us. So who is it?)
(Shouting in French)
Pagaie! Pagayez! Allez (Paddle! Paddle! Come on!)
"pointez la lampe de poche sur lui" (focus the light on him) "il faut tenir la lampe torche" (We have to hold the light)
"Brennan, aidez à pagayer" (brennan, help paddling)
"Allez dépêchez-vous ! Nous dérivons avec le courant" (come on! hurry up! we are moving with the stream)
"Non, y'a que lui ! Pas de bateau, rien" (no.. There's only him! no boat! nothing!)
"Les vagues vont nous amener jusque sur la côte" (the waves will bring us to the coast)
"le vent ( ??) par ici" (the wind ( ??) over here)
"Oh nom de dieu Brennan ! Ta gueule !" (for godsake brennan! shut up!)
"allez, tirez-le dans le radeau" (come on, bring him in the raft) "Aide moi" (help me) "Il est lourd !" (he’s heavy)
"Tiens, il respire encore" (He's still breathing)
(speaking in French continues)


AUTOMATED VOICE OVER RADIO: 4... 8...
MONTAND: Robert... Regarde, le signal vient de l’ile. (look, the signal comes from the island)
ROBERT: Tu peux déterminer la source ? (can you find the source ?)
AUTOMATED VOICE OVER RADIO: 15... 16...
MONTAND: Bien sûr que oui. Regarde. (yes of course, look !)
ROBERT: Tu crois qu'l'île est habitée ? (do you think the island's inhabited ?)
(both speaking french)
ROUSSEAU: Ça va ? Comment tu te sens ? (how are you ? how are you feeling ?)
JIN: No understand.
ROUSSEAU: (French accent) You speak English?
JIN: (Panting) Little.
ROUSSEAU: Are you okay?
JIN: Yes.
ROUSSEAU: How did you get here?
JIN: Boat.
Robert surement : Qui est-ce? (who is he ?)
Montand : On s’en fout qui c'est. Qu’est ce qu’il fait ici ? (I don’t care who he is. What is he doing here ?)
ROUSSEAU: Il dit qu’il est venu en bateau. (he said he came by boat)
ROBERT: (French accent) What boat?
JIN: It's gone. Sink.
ROUSSEAU: It must've been caught in the same storm as ours.
MONTAND: Who are you? How long you in the water?
JIN: I don't know.
MONTAND: How do you not know how you wound up in the middle of the ocean, hein ?
ROUSSEAU: Montand ! Laisse-le, il est en état de choc. On a de l’eau à lui donner ? (leave him alone, he is shook up, do we have water for him ?)
Robert : Ouais. (yeah) (comes back with the water) Tiens. (Here)
ROUSSEAU: Merci, Robert. (thank you Robert)
JIN: (Exhales deeply) Thank you.
ROUSSEAU: What is your name?
JIN: Kwon Jin-su. Jin.
ROUSSEAU: Hello, Jin. I'm Danielle. Danielle Rousseau.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Last Night's Lost

#17 Post by MarleysGh0st » Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:01 pm

silverscreenselect wrote:
MarleysGh0st wrote:I missed the explanation:
Spoiler
Why did Claire's mom happen to be in LA and talking to Ben's lawyer, since she didn't know anything about Aaron?
Spoiler
She was in LA to receive the settlement check from the plane crash (as Claire's presumed next of kin). Apparently, the attorney was representing her and some of the other relatives of other victims.
Spoiler
Oceanic couldn't just mail the check to Australia? I thought it was only the Nigerians who have such trouble with international fund transfers! :P

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

Re: Last Night's Lost

#18 Post by tanstaafl2 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:03 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
MarleysGh0st wrote:I missed the explanation:
Spoiler
Why did Claire's mom happen to be in LA and talking to Ben's lawyer, since she didn't know anything about Aaron?
Spoiler
She was in LA to receive the settlement check from the plane crash (as Claire's presumed next of kin). Apparently, the attorney was representing her and some of the other relatives of other victims.
Spoiler
Oceanic couldn't just mail the check to Australia? I thought it was only the Nigerians who have such trouble with international fund transfers! :P
Spoiler
A wee bit less TV drama if they do something logical like that! Maybe they cut the check for her lawyer who takes his cut before passing on what little is left to her...
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
smilergrogan
Posts: 1529
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:22 pm
Location: under a big W

Re: Last Night's Lost

#19 Post by smilergrogan » Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:19 pm

tanstaafl2 wrote:
smilergrogan wrote:
Spoiler
Also am I right that every even-numbered flash always brings them back to the present time, i.e. the day the freighter blew up or following day or two? That would mean the outrigger boat people from last night arrived at that time (though they could be time travellers themselves, I guess). I wonder what the range of possible eras for the odd-numbered flashes is. Maybe limited by whenever the ship's tiller mechanism under the Orchid station was first established?
Spoiler
I don't think that is correct. After the camp with Richard in the 1950's disappeared they flashed forward to the time of the light from the hatch right? Then they flashed forward again to the outriggers (camp there but abandoned). The time frame is uncertain here. Is it shortly after the freighter blew up or long after (Those beer cans looked like they had been there awhile!). Then they flashed yet again, this time back to the time when Daniele arrived. If there is a rhyme or reason to the flashes it doesn't seem clear to me yet.
Spoiler
You're right - they went from 1954 to two months before the freighter blew up in one flash. The flashes do seem to favor important island events - H-bomb test, Nigerian plane arrives, Aaron's birth, Frenchies arrive. Probably there will be one going back to the Black Rock's arrival (I am guessing that will also be Richard's arrival), if that far back is allowed.

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24617
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Last Night's Lost

#20 Post by silverscreenselect » Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:24 pm

smilergrogan wrote:
tanstaafl2 wrote:
smilergrogan wrote:
Spoiler
Also am I right that every even-numbered flash always brings them back to the present time, i.e. the day the freighter blew up or following day or two? That would mean the outrigger boat people from last night arrived at that time (though they could be time travellers themselves, I guess). I wonder what the range of possible eras for the odd-numbered flashes is. Maybe limited by whenever the ship's tiller mechanism under the Orchid station was first established?
Spoiler
I don't think that is correct. After the camp with Richard in the 1950's disappeared they flashed forward to the time of the light from the hatch right? Then they flashed forward again to the outriggers (camp there but abandoned). The time frame is uncertain here. Is it shortly after the freighter blew up or long after (Those beer cans looked like they had been there awhile!). Then they flashed yet again, this time back to the time when Daniele arrived. If there is a rhyme or reason to the flashes it doesn't seem clear to me yet.
Spoiler
You're right - they went from 1954 to two months before the freighter blew up in one flash. The flashes do seem to favor important island events - H-bomb test, Nigerian plane arrives, Aaron's birth, Frenchies arrive. Probably there will be one going back to the Black Rock's arrival (I am guessing that will also be Richard's arrival), if that far back is allowed.
Spoiler
How about the arrival of the people who built the statue of a four-toed foot? Or are they just going to completely ignore that and hope we forget about it as well?

Although it would be neat if some time we saw Richard take his shoe off and show that he only had four toes on his foot.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
clem21
Nose Exploder
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: Got the New York City Rhythm

Re: Last Night's Lost

#21 Post by clem21 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:37 pm

silverscreenselect wrote:
tanstaafl2 wrote:
Spoiler
And it was equally clear to me right away that the Frenchies were Danielle and company. But are the doing all this for fun's sake? It wasn't as those Danielle appeared to recognize Jin 17 years (or how ever long it was) later. Of course back then they probably hadn't made up this story line!
Spoiler
Towards the end of the show, Ben told Sun that he had proof that Jin was still alive on the island, and it may have something to do with the time Jin spent with the Frenchies (perhaps a photo of him with Danielle that Ben got hold of years later).
Spoiler
Umm....did I miss this?

The last I saw Sun she was still in her car with a gun. Did I miss a scene somewhere?
"Some people never go crazy, What truly horrible lives they must live..."
-Charles Bukowski

2011 [Bleep]house Rats Award Winner
2011 I've Been Everywhere New England Region Co-Champion

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

Re: Last Night's Lost

#22 Post by tanstaafl2 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:39 pm

silverscreenselect wrote:
Spoiler
How about the arrival of the people who built the statue of a four-toed foot? Or are they just going to completely ignore that and hope we forget about it as well?

Although it would be neat if some time we saw Richard take his shoe off and show that he only had four toes on his foot.
Spoiler
Would be curious to see that explained but it may be one of the many details that never quite gets addressed. Theories on Lostpedia abound.

The theory that it represents some great past civilization that has since collapsed has always appealed to me but who knows with this show. Could just be thatthe producers are messing with us.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: Last Night's Lost

#23 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:50 pm

silverscreenselect wrote:
smilergrogan wrote:
tanstaafl2 wrote:
Spoiler
I don't think that is correct. After the camp with Richard in the 1950's disappeared they flashed forward to the time of the light from the hatch right? Then they flashed forward again to the outriggers (camp there but abandoned). The time frame is uncertain here. Is it shortly after the freighter blew up or long after (Those beer cans looked like they had been there awhile!). Then they flashed yet again, this time back to the time when Daniele arrived. If there is a rhyme or reason to the flashes it doesn't seem clear to me yet.
Spoiler
You're right - they went from 1954 to two months before the freighter blew up in one flash. The flashes do seem to favor important island events - H-bomb test, Nigerian plane arrives, Aaron's birth, Frenchies arrive. Probably there will be one going back to the Black Rock's arrival (I am guessing that will also be Richard's arrival), if that far back is allowed.
Spoiler
How about the arrival of the people who built the statue of a four-toed foot? Or are they just going to completely ignore that and hope we forget about it as well?

Although it would be neat if some time we saw Richard take his shoe off and show that he only had four toes on his foot.
In the Lost podcast, Cuse & Lindelof have said that we will see the 4-toed statue again. They implied that we would see it from before it was destroyed.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: Last Night's Lost

#24 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:51 pm

clem21 wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
tanstaafl2 wrote:
Spoiler
And it was equally clear to me right away that the Frenchies were Danielle and company. But are the doing all this for fun's sake? It wasn't as those Danielle appeared to recognize Jin 17 years (or how ever long it was) later. Of course back then they probably hadn't made up this story line!
Spoiler
Towards the end of the show, Ben told Sun that he had proof that Jin was still alive on the island, and it may have something to do with the time Jin spent with the Frenchies (perhaps a photo of him with Danielle that Ben got hold of years later).
Spoiler
Umm....did I miss this?

The last I saw Sun she was still in her car with a gun. Did I miss a scene somewhere?
Spoiler
It was in the preview of next week's episode.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

Post Reply