Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
minimetoo26
Royal Pain In Everyone's Ass
Posts: 7874
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:51 am
Location: No Fixed Address

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#26 Post by minimetoo26 » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:12 am

Shrill? :roll:
Knowing a great deal is not the same as being smart; intelligence is not information alone but also judgment, the manner in which information is collected and used.

-Carl Sagan

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24616
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#27 Post by silverscreenselect » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:13 am

franktangredi wrote: As for #1 -- it was certainly not directed at you unless you really believe that it is a bad thing to elect any African American to the presidency. (Reread what I said, please. It had nothing to do with Barack Obama, it had to do with America.) I do not believe you are a bigot if you oppose Obama. I do believe you are one if you oppose elected any African American (or Jew or Catholic or Mormon or Arab or Italian ....)
It's interesting that there wasn't similar acclaim when Clarence Thomas was named to the Supreme Court, when Colin Powell and Condi Rice were named Secretary of States, or when Michael Steele, Lynn Swann and Ken Blackwell ran for governors. While the media has been peeing in its pants in its efforts to turn Obama into the second Abe Lincoln, there was silence or condemnation for what those others I mentioned had accomplished. Claims that Clarence Thomas was unqualified (and I do think he is well qualified for the Supreme Court in terms of intellect, although his answers to a lot of questions about what opinions he had formed were debatable) were par for the course.

Obama's election is an advance for us as a nation in terms of racial tolerance. I don't know of anyone other than a handful of the worst degenerates out there who thinks that the days of lynch mobs and Jim Crow were the "good old days." But I feel that a large part of the adulation and self-congratulation that people are doing is in equal part due to their perception that Obama is a liberal who will bring "change we can believe in."
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#28 Post by ne1410s » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:13 am

frank:
Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?
Frank, no good deed or intention EVER goes unpunished...
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
minimetoo26
Royal Pain In Everyone's Ass
Posts: 7874
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:51 am
Location: No Fixed Address

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#29 Post by minimetoo26 » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:15 am

franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?

Why? Be yourself. Don't let the shouters change you into what they want you to be.
Knowing a great deal is not the same as being smart; intelligence is not information alone but also judgment, the manner in which information is collected and used.

-Carl Sagan

User avatar
franktangredi
Posts: 6678
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:34 pm

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#30 Post by franktangredi » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:18 am

minimetoo26 wrote:
franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?

Why? Be yourself. Don't let the shouters change you into what they want you to be.
It's not that. It's that it has become an occasion for acrimony, and I was at least partly responsible for that. And that doesn't make me happy.

But maybe you're right. Maybe my new motto should be POMPOUS AND PROUD OF IT!

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24616
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#31 Post by silverscreenselect » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:18 am

minimetoo26 wrote:I think sss post with the term "about to" was the one jumping to conclusions. But I guess he gets a free pass since you agree with him, huh?
Does anyone on this Bored really think there aren't a whole lot of people in this country who have sky-high expectations about what they think Obama is going to accomplish?
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#32 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:20 am

Although the "shame on you" parts of the original post could have been omitted, I want to say that I agree with everything frank wrote. Even the "shame on you"s.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
Tocqueville3
Posts: 702
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:39 am
Location: Mississippi

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#33 Post by Tocqueville3 » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:20 am

minimetoo26 wrote:Shrill? :roll:
Oh please.

You're the one who asked.
"I would drape myself in velvet if it were socially acceptable."
--George Costanza

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#34 Post by ne1410s » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:21 am

sss:
Does anyone on this Bored really think there aren't a whole lot of people in this country who have sky-high expectations about what they think Obama is going to accomplish?
George W Bush has set the bar so low for so long that expectations do not have to be "sky-high". About chin high should do it.
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
minimetoo26
Royal Pain In Everyone's Ass
Posts: 7874
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:51 am
Location: No Fixed Address

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#35 Post by minimetoo26 » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:21 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
minimetoo26 wrote:I think sss post with the term "about to" was the one jumping to conclusions. But I guess he gets a free pass since you agree with him, huh?
Does anyone on this Bored really think there aren't a whole lot of people in this country who have sky-high expectations about what they think Obama is going to accomplish?
SOME people have sky-high expectations about every incoming president. Here we tend to be more reasoned and rational.


Well, SOME of us. Others seem unnaturally bitter, and others overoptimistic. But as of today he is the president, and we'll have to deal with that and hope for the best.

Which is what Frank said and got his head bitten off for saying it.
Knowing a great deal is not the same as being smart; intelligence is not information alone but also judgment, the manner in which information is collected and used.

-Carl Sagan

User avatar
WheresFanny
???????
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:24 am
Location: Hello Kitty Paradise

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#36 Post by WheresFanny » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:21 am

minimetoo26 wrote:
franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?

Why? Be yourself. Don't let the shouters change you into what they want you to be.
Don't go to all that trouble, Frank. You can fix that post in three easy steps:

1. Edit your post to add "In my opinion" to the beginning (or the end). :wink:

2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic! :D

3. Read it over and make sure you didn't use the word "clearly" anywhere. :P

Viola!
Last edited by WheresFanny on Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
We, the HK Brigade, do hereby salute you, Marley, for your steadfast devotion to ontopicosity. Well done, sir!

User avatar
TheCalvinator24
Posts: 4886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#37 Post by TheCalvinator24 » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:22 am

And ne1410s wins the "who will post the first slam of George W. Bush in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with him?" contest
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore

User avatar
franktangredi
Posts: 6678
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:34 pm

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#38 Post by franktangredi » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:24 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
minimetoo26 wrote:I think sss post with the term "about to" was the one jumping to conclusions. But I guess he gets a free pass since you agree with him, huh?
Does anyone on this Bored really think there aren't a whole lot of people in this country who have sky-high expectations about what they think Obama is going to accomplish?
Of course there are! Some people are incredibly unrealistic. That neither validates nor invalidates the fact that all your expectations are in the opposite direction.

I know that some Obama supporters will have disappointments ahead. You should be hoping for pleasant surprises.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#39 Post by MarleysGh0st » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:24 am

franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?
You can edit your own posts, but you can't delete the thread, which includes quoted portions of your original text. Everyone else who posted would have to edit their own posts.

A moderator might have the power to delete the thread, but the general consensus has been to avoid heavy-handed moderation of that sort.

User avatar
franktangredi
Posts: 6678
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:34 pm

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#40 Post by franktangredi » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:26 am

WheresFanny wrote:
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic! :D
What does this mean?

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#41 Post by ne1410s » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:27 am

cal:
And ne1410s wins the "who will post the first slam of George W. Bush in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with him?" contest
One cannot type "George W Bush" without having it be a slam. Kinda like "Warren G Harding".

I don't write the jokes: they write themselves.
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
Tocqueville3
Posts: 702
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:39 am
Location: Mississippi

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#42 Post by Tocqueville3 » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:29 am

franktangredi wrote:
WheresFanny wrote:
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic! :D
What does this mean?
I think she means that Appa edits his posts. A lot. To say the least.
"I would drape myself in velvet if it were socially acceptable."
--George Costanza

User avatar
WheresFanny
???????
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:24 am
Location: Hello Kitty Paradise

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#43 Post by WheresFanny » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:32 am

franktangredi wrote:
WheresFanny wrote:
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic! :D
What does this mean?
:D :) :o :P :wink:

Also known as an Appa Pass or a Passive Aggressive Stick.

If you add an emoticon at the end, you can say whatever you want and nobody can disagree or take offense. Because you were j/k!

Some people seem to think so, anyway.

(I was actually just trying to add a little levity to the situation.)
Last edited by WheresFanny on Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
We, the HK Brigade, do hereby salute you, Marley, for your steadfast devotion to ontopicosity. Well done, sir!

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#44 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:34 am

franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?
That you want to do that says enough.

User avatar
WheresFanny
???????
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:24 am
Location: Hello Kitty Paradise

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#45 Post by WheresFanny » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:34 am

Tocqueville3 wrote:
franktangredi wrote:
WheresFanny wrote:
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic! :D
What does this mean?
I think she means that Appa edits his posts. A lot. To say the least.
I didn't even think of that, but it plays as well.
We, the HK Brigade, do hereby salute you, Marley, for your steadfast devotion to ontopicosity. Well done, sir!

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#46 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:35 am

WheresFanny wrote:
minimetoo26 wrote:
franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?

Why? Be yourself. Don't let the shouters change you into what they want you to be.
Don't go to all that trouble, Frank. You can fix that post in three easy steps:

1. Edit your post to add "In my opinion" to the beginning (or the end). :wink:

2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic! :D

3. Read it over and make sure you didn't use the word "clearly" anywhere. :P

Viola!
This is very funny.

User avatar
tlynn78
Posts: 9565
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:31 am
Location: Montana

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#47 Post by tlynn78 » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:41 am

And ne1410s wins the "who will post the first slam of George W. Bush in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with him?" contest

Shirley, you're not surprised?


t.
When reality requires approval, control replaces truth.
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. -Thomas Paine
You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. -Ayn Rand
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire

User avatar
Jeemie
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#48 Post by Jeemie » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:49 am

This thread should be left as a standing testament to Wintergreen's oft-repeated statement that our biases are most clearly revealed in our mistakes.
1979 City of Champions 2009

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#49 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:57 am

WheresFanny wrote:
franktangredi wrote:
WheresFanny wrote:
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic! :D
What does this mean?
:D :) :o :P :wink:

Also known as an Appa Pass or a Passive Aggressive Stick.

If you add an emoticon at the end, you can say whatever you want and nobody can disagree or take offense. Because you were j/k!
Clearly, Fanny is correct! ;)

User avatar
WheresFanny
???????
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:24 am
Location: Hello Kitty Paradise

Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on

#50 Post by WheresFanny » Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:58 am

PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:
WheresFanny wrote:
franktangredi wrote: What does this mean?
:D :) :o :P :wink:

Also known as an Appa Pass or a Passive Aggressive Stick.

If you add an emoticon at the end, you can say whatever you want and nobody can disagree or take offense. Because you were j/k!
Clearly, Fanny is correct! ;)
In your opinion. I think.
We, the HK Brigade, do hereby salute you, Marley, for your steadfast devotion to ontopicosity. Well done, sir!

Post Reply