Article about some Family Week contestants

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Message
Author
User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Article about some Family Week contestants

#1 Post by MarleysGh0st » Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:53 pm

They'll be in the Hot Seats on Wednesday.

http://www.thedailystar.com/local/local ... 40006.html
Margaretville Village Treasurer Betty DeSilva may be keeping track of more than just the village's money after she appears on "Who Wants to Be A Millionaire" on Wednesday.

Betty DeSilva, 71, joined her daughter Diane DeSilva, 50, of Clifton Park, and her granddaughter, Bree Ballard, 26, of Clifton Park, as a team on a special family week on the show hosted by Meredith Vieira.


Sounds like a bunch of families got left behind.
The women arrived at ABC at 6 a.m. and were warned to plan to be there until 8 p.m. Betty said there were 10 to 12 family groups, but at the end of the day only six families made it on the show.
Ouch!

User avatar
ulysses5019
Purveyor of Avatars
Posts: 19442
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#2 Post by ulysses5019 » Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:55 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:They'll be in the Hot Seats on Wednesday.

http://www.thedailystar.com/local/local ... 40006.html
Margaretville Village Treasurer Betty DeSilva may be keeping track of more than just the village's money after she appears on "Who Wants to Be A Millionaire" on Wednesday.

Betty DeSilva, 71, joined her daughter Diane DeSilva, 50, of Clifton Park, and her granddaughter, Bree Ballard, 26, of Clifton Park, as a team on a special family week on the show hosted by Meredith Vieira.


Sounds like a bunch of families got left behind.
The women arrived at ABC at 6 a.m. and were warned to plan to be there until 8 p.m. Betty said there were 10 to 12 family groups, but at the end of the day only six families made it on the show.
Ouch!
I thought Bush said no one would be left behind?
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.

User avatar
Rafferbee
Posts: 758
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:43 am
Location: Columbia, MD
Contact:

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#3 Post by Rafferbee » Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:38 pm

If there were 10-12 family groups, that means there were at least 30 people in the Green Room.

User avatar
ulysses5019
Purveyor of Avatars
Posts: 19442
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#4 Post by ulysses5019 » Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:46 pm

Rafferty Barnes wrote:If there were 10-12 family groups, that means there were at least 30 people in the Green Room.
That does sound a wee bit crowded. Especially when the winners come back with their winnings, small unmarked bills only of course.
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#5 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:21 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:They'll be in the Hot Seats on Wednesday.

http://www.thedailystar.com/local/local ... 40006.html
Margaretville Village Treasurer Betty DeSilva may be keeping track of more than just the village's money after she appears on "Who Wants to Be A Millionaire" on Wednesday.

Betty DeSilva, 71, joined her daughter Diane DeSilva, 50, of Clifton Park, and her granddaughter, Bree Ballard, 26, of Clifton Park, as a team on a special family week on the show hosted by Meredith Vieira.


Sounds like a bunch of families got left behind.
The women arrived at ABC at 6 a.m. and were warned to plan to be there until 8 p.m. Betty said there were 10 to 12 family groups, but at the end of the day only six families made it on the show.
Ouch!
<sigh>

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27106
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#6 Post by Bob Juch » Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:26 pm

That could have been a major financial hit for the families that didn't get on. They probably brought more than just the team of three. That could have cost a couple of thousand if they flew from the west coast.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#7 Post by MarleysGh0st » Sun Nov 16, 2008 8:58 am

Bob Juch wrote:That could have been a major financial hit for the families that didn't get on. They probably brought more than just the team of three. That could have cost a couple of thousand if they flew from the west coast.
I wonder if TPTB decided to take some of the left out family team members as individual contestants in a regular episode? One from each family, probably.

It's going to be really interesting to see how they manage getting input from three different contestants at once, under the pressure of the damned clock.

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#8 Post by TheConfessor » Sun Nov 16, 2008 8:43 pm

According to Buzzer Blog, tomorrow's Expert is Alan Thicke, but he doesn't last the full week, since Ken Jennings returns later in the week. The speculation is that Thicke sucked, so Ken replaced him, which may or may not be true. I do know that the guy who runs that site communicates with Michael Davies sometimes, so his speculation may have some credibility.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#9 Post by MarleysGh0st » Sun Nov 16, 2008 8:57 pm

TheConfessor wrote:According to Buzzer Blog, tomorrow's Expert is Alan Thicke, but he doesn't last the full week, since Ken Jennings returns later in the week. The speculation is that Thicke sucked, so Ken replaced him, which may or may not be true. I do know that the guy who runs that site communicates with Michael Davies sometimes, so his speculation may have some credibility.
How in the world are they selecting these celebrity experts? Are they all people who Meredith or Michael meet at cocktail parties? :roll:

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#10 Post by TheConfessor » Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:39 pm

Thicke did OK today. He got an easy 8K question. Meredith kept pimping him and encouraging contestants to call him, especially when the question was related to TV in any way.

User avatar
sunflower
Bored Hooligan
Posts: 8010
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
Location: East Hartford, CT

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#11 Post by sunflower » Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:51 pm

Some celebrities are rather smart, so you never know. You would probably never know if someone famous was a trivia guru...but I think Meredith was probably smart to steer contestants toward using him for tv questions which is probably Alan Thicke's strength. I would imagine there is some bad press about that lifeline so if they can do anything to help the stats, it might seem better. I wonder if they'll keep that for next season. I think if they do they should consider having a resident expert, for consistency, so you know you will get to call whoever no matter when you tape.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#12 Post by MarleysGh0st » Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:05 pm

sunflower wrote:Some celebrities are rather smart, so you never know. You would probably never know if someone famous was a trivia guru...but I think Meredith was probably smart to steer contestants toward using him for tv questions which is probably Alan Thicke's strength.
Yeah, but to paraphrase that JG Wentworth commercial: "It's your lifeline. Use it when you want to!" A lifeline that's only really good for one topic, where he may or may not be needed, is pretty crummy.
sunflower wrote:I would imagine there is some bad press about that lifeline so if they can do anything to help the stats, it might seem better. I wonder if they'll keep that for next season. I think if they do they should consider having a resident expert, for consistency, so you know you will get to call whoever no matter when you tape.
Has there been any press reviewing the new lifelines? I do a Google News search every day and all I find are occasional articles about contestants which may quote from the standard WWTBAM press release explaining what the new lifelines are. I don't think anybody is paying attention to this like we are.

Personally, I'd prefer that they discard the ATE next season and bring back Switch The Question. If used with Topic List, they could simply add one topic to the top of the list; switching the question would then mean skipping a question to one that would have been the next higher level.

But since TPTB are always so eager to take my advice... :|

User avatar
sunflower
Bored Hooligan
Posts: 8010
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
Location: East Hartford, CT

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#13 Post by sunflower » Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:11 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:Personally, I'd prefer that they discard the ATE next season and bring back Switch The Question. If used with Topic List, they could simply add one topic to the top of the list; switching the question would then mean skipping a question to one that would have been the next higher level.
I agree with you, Marley...STQ didn't help me personally, but I believe it was more valuable than an ask the expert would be. At least it's in my hands, and not some expert who I don't know and have zero faith in! And to just throw away a question can help you mentally, instead of getting hung up on it and burning multiple lifelines, you just throw it away!

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#14 Post by MarleysGh0st » Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:29 pm

sunflower wrote:
MarleysGh0st wrote:Personally, I'd prefer that they discard the ATE next season and bring back Switch The Question. If used with Topic List, they could simply add one topic to the top of the list; switching the question would then mean skipping a question to one that would have been the next higher level.
I agree with you, Marley...STQ didn't help me personally, but I believe it was more valuable than an ask the expert would be. At least it's in my hands, and not some expert who I don't know and have zero faith in! And to just throw away a question can help you mentally, instead of getting hung up on it and burning multiple lifelines, you just throw it away!
The one thing I didn't like about the STQ was that the replacement question sometimes wasn't much of a change; a pop music question might be replaced by another pop music question. If STQ was used with the Topic Tree, you'd know you'd be going from "Srcrabble" to "Express Yourself." Whatever that meant. :wink:

User avatar
gsabc
Posts: 6496
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
Contact:

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#15 Post by gsabc » Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:31 pm

sunflower wrote:
MarleysGh0st wrote:Personally, I'd prefer that they discard the ATE next season and bring back Switch The Question. If used with Topic List, they could simply add one topic to the top of the list; switching the question would then mean skipping a question to one that would have been the next higher level.
I agree with you, Marley...STQ didn't help me personally, but I believe it was more valuable than an ask the expert would be. At least it's in my hands, and not some expert who I don't know and have zero faith in! And to just throw away a question can help you mentally, instead of getting hung up on it and burning multiple lifelines, you just throw it away!
Could be worse. They might have gone the Play It! route and gone with PACS (Phone A Complete Stranger), picking numbers out of the NYC phone book or just stopping people walking by outside the studio at that moment.
I just ordered chicken and an egg from Amazon. I'll let you know.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#16 Post by MarleysGh0st » Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:44 pm

gsabc wrote: Could be worse. They might have gone the Play It! route and gone with PACS (Phone A Complete Stranger), picking numbers out of the NYC phone book or just stopping people walking by outside the studio at that moment.
Random strangers would unpleasantly remind TPTB of the Phone Game. Can't have anyone appear on the show, whether contestant or expert, without being vetted for personality! :roll:
Last edited by MarleysGh0st on Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
sunflower
Bored Hooligan
Posts: 8010
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
Location: East Hartford, CT

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#17 Post by sunflower » Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:58 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:
gsabc wrote:
sunflower wrote: Could be worse. They might have gone the Play It! route and gone with PACS (Phone A Complete Stranger), picking numbers out of the NYC phone book or just stopping people walking by outside the studio at that moment.
Random strangers would unpleasantly remind TPTB of the Phone Game. Can't have anyone appear on the show, whether contestant or expert, without being vetted for personality! :roll:
Hey! I didn't right that! I agree that it would suck, but it's not my quote! :P

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#18 Post by MarleysGh0st » Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:04 pm

sunflower wrote: Hey! I didn't right that! I agree that it would suck, but it's not my quote! :P
Oops, I cut out your comments (since I was responding to gsabc) but left in your quote tags. :oops:

It's fixed now. :)

User avatar
gsabc
Posts: 6496
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
Contact:

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#19 Post by gsabc » Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:55 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:
sunflower wrote: Hey! I didn't right that! I agree that it would suck, but it's not my quote! :P
Oops, I cut out your comments (since I was responding to gsabc) but left in your quote tags. :oops:

It's fixed now. :)
That's okay. Get ignored when my post count increases over someone else's, have my quotes attributed to someone else - it's all just part of my Mr. Cellophane persona.

(If it's not already prepared, I may just have created my own portrait from ES.)
I just ordered chicken and an egg from Amazon. I'll let you know.

User avatar
sunflower
Bored Hooligan
Posts: 8010
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
Location: East Hartford, CT

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#20 Post by sunflower » Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:56 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:
sunflower wrote: Hey! I didn't right that! I agree that it would suck, but it's not my quote! :P
Oops, I cut out your comments (since I was responding to gsabc) but left in your quote tags. :oops:

It's fixed now. :)
That's okay, I apparently don't know how to spell "write"...we all make mistakes!! I was trying to be a wise ass and managed to mess it up! :oops:

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#21 Post by MarleysGh0st » Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:11 pm

gsabc wrote: That's okay. Get ignored when my post count increases over someone else's, have my quotes attributed to someone else - it's all just part of my Mr. Cellophane persona.

(If it's not already prepared, I may just have created my own portrait from ES.)
Yeah, sure, Mr. Cellophane. If I lose my concentration on my gh0stly appararition for just a second, I

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#22 Post by TheConfessor » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:26 pm

The speculation that Thicke would be Thick as a Brick seems unfounded. He came through again today, although he still seems not all that eager to be there, except to promote a couple books he wrote.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#23 Post by MarleysGh0st » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:39 pm

TheConfessor wrote:The speculation that Thicke would be Thick as a Brick seems unfounded. He came through again today, although he still seems not all that eager to be there, except to promote a couple books he wrote.
I can't wait to see if it's another challenging question like Bill Cosby's sweaters! :roll:

Please don't spoil it! :P

User avatar
sunflower
Bored Hooligan
Posts: 8010
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
Location: East Hartford, CT

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#24 Post by sunflower » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:45 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:
TheConfessor wrote:The speculation that Thicke would be Thick as a Brick seems unfounded. He came through again today, although he still seems not all that eager to be there, except to promote a couple books he wrote.
I can't wait to see if it's another challenging question like Bill Cosby's sweaters! :roll:

Please don't spoil it! :P
I really can't believe with 3 generations, that they didn't know that. That was THE show to watch back in the day!

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

Re: Article about some Family Week contestants

#25 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:46 pm

gsabc wrote:
MarleysGh0st wrote:
sunflower wrote: Hey! I didn't right that! I agree that it would suck, but it's not my quote! :P
Oops, I cut out your comments (since I was responding to gsabc) but left in your quote tags. :oops:

It's fixed now. :)
That's okay. Get ignored when my post count increases over someone else's, have my quotes attributed to someone else - it's all just part of my Mr. Cellophane persona.

(If it's not already prepared, I may just have created my own portrait from ES.)
Did you turn green?

Post Reply