Does anyone know if this ref got a Bud Light?
- Jeemie
- Posts: 7303
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
- Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!
Does anyone know if this ref got a Bud Light?
Check out what the umpire does to the SC quarterback in this Youtube clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcdWdBgUBqw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcdWdBgUBqw
1979 City of Champions 2009
- gsabc
- Posts: 6496
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
- Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
- Contact:
Re: Does anyone know if this ref got a Bud Light?
Good grief! What sanctions have been put on that dude? Not to mention investigating possible bets on the other team.
I just ordered chicken and an egg from Amazon. I'll let you know.
- Jeemie
- Posts: 7303
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
- Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!
Re: Does anyone know if this ref got a Bud Light?
To be fair, I saw a website where this was discussed, and someone who is an official said the ump did exactly what he was trained to do when caught in "no man's land" with a player bearing down on him and he couldn't get out of the way.
I don't know, though- to me, it looked like the ump had plenty of time to backtrack to his left.
Ah...but to me, the best block ever by an official was one by the official in Super Bowl XIII that sprung Franco Harris free for a 22-yard touchdown run!
I don't know, though- to me, it looked like the ump had plenty of time to backtrack to his left.
Ah...but to me, the best block ever by an official was one by the official in Super Bowl XIII that sprung Franco Harris free for a 22-yard touchdown run!
1979 City of Champions 2009
- gsabc
- Posts: 6496
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
- Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
- Contact:
Re: Does anyone know if this ref got a Bud Light?
It also looks like he deliberately stepped into the ball carrier, while making no effort to look for what appears to be a fairly obvious "escape route". If the play made a difference in the game's outcome, I'd be more than a little suspicious.
I just ordered chicken and an egg from Amazon. I'll let you know.
- Tocqueville3
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:39 am
- Location: Mississippi
Re: Does anyone know if this ref got a Bud Light?
Heh.
Looks to me like an occupational hazard.
Looks to me like an occupational hazard.
"I would drape myself in velvet if it were socially acceptable."
--George Costanza
--George Costanza
- Jeemie
- Posts: 7303
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
- Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!
Re: Does anyone know if this ref got a Bud Light?
Gamecocks only lost by 7- I do not know if this prevented a TD from being scored.gsabc wrote:It also looks like he deliberately stepped into the ball carrier, while making no effort to look for what appears to be a fairly obvious "escape route". If the play made a difference in the game's outcome, I'd be more than a little suspicious.
1979 City of Champions 2009
- themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: Does anyone know if this ref got a Bud Light?
In an earlier play, the ref screened off a tackler from the gamecock ball carrier who went for a large gain. That's why we call it a game. This play was not a game changer.
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.