The stats:
35.5 inches; 27.5 pounds.
My days as the tallest in the house may come to an end.
What's that percentagewise, for 18 months?Appa23 wrote:Princess Pudding Pop (from the Land of J-E-L-L-O) went to the doctor today. She took exception to the 4 shots.
The stats:
35.5 inches; 27.5 pounds.
My days as the tallest in the house may come to an end.
If the theory to double the height of the child (female) at 18 months is true, then you have reason to be concerned. When she gets older, I can help with where to find long pants though! LOLAppa23 wrote:Princess Pudding Pop (from the Land of J-E-L-L-O) went to the doctor today. She took exception to the 4 shots.
The stats:
35.5 inches; 27.5 pounds.
My days as the tallest in the house may come to an end.
I assume and trust that is healthy and normal. I'm just thinking that if I had the same weight to height ratio, I'd weigh about 57 pounds. But I'd probably be dead long before I reached that point.Appa23 wrote: The stats:
35.5 inches; 27.5 pounds.
MarleysGh0st wrote:What's that percentagewise, for 18 months?Appa23 wrote:Princess Pudding Pop (from the Land of J-E-L-L-O) went to the doctor today. She took exception to the 4 shots.
The stats:
35.5 inches; 27.5 pounds.
My days as the tallest in the house may come to an end.
Yup, I did that. Big J was 3'4 at age 2.Ritterskoop wrote:To get your adult height, measure the child at age 24 months and double that. It worked within an inch for all three of us and numerous others my family knows.
Yeah, my mom told me that back when I was young, she had heard it was double the height at 18 months for girls, and 2 years for boys.a1mamacat wrote:Yup, I did that. Big J was 3'4 at age 2.Ritterskoop wrote:To get your adult height, measure the child at age 24 months and double that. It worked within an inch for all three of us and numerous others my family knows.
EEEEEEEK!!!
Ok. Our pediatrician has gone high tech.Appa23 wrote:MarleysGh0st wrote:What's that percentagewise, for 18 months?Appa23 wrote:Princess Pudding Pop (from the Land of J-E-L-L-O) went to the doctor today. She took exception to the 4 shots.
The stats:
35.5 inches; 27.5 pounds.
My days as the tallest in the house may come to an end.
Looking at the CDC growth charts, she would be well over the top line (which is the 95 percent line), so I would guesstimate around 99th percentile for height.
Her weight was around 90th percentile.
Very healthy. She hopefully will be having her last surgery for the congenital nevus on her scalp in the next month or two.
The scientist in me laughs.Appa23 wrote:Ok. Our pediatrician has gone high tech.Appa23 wrote:MarleysGh0st wrote: What's that percentagewise, for 18 months?
Looking at the CDC growth charts, she would be well over the top line (which is the 95 percent line), so I would guesstimate around 99th percentile for height.
Her weight was around 90th percentile.
Very healthy. She hopefully will be having her last surgery for the congenital nevus on her scalp in the next month or two.
When I got home, there was a sheet with the exact percentiles.
99.76% for height, 84.24% for weight, and 59.48% for head circumference.
I did wonder about the hundredth-place "accuracy". I know that they moved to a "paperless" office, where everything is computerized, with those tablet computers.mrkelley23 wrote:The scientist in me laughs.Appa23 wrote:Ok. Our pediatrician has gone high tech.Appa23 wrote:
Looking at the CDC growth charts, she would be well over the top line (which is the 95 percent line), so I would guesstimate around 99th percentile for height.
Her weight was around 90th percentile.
Very healthy. She hopefully will be having her last surgery for the congenital nevus on her scalp in the next month or two.
When I got home, there was a sheet with the exact percentiles.
99.76% for height, 84.24% for weight, and 59.48% for head circumference.
Because even if your pediatrician did go "high-tech," I guarantee you that only a very small percentage of those measurements are made by high precision tools. So to claim precision to the hundredth of a percentile is as laughable as my students who copy all nine digits off their calculator on a given lab problem, because more digits must mean more correct, right?
Congratulations on rearing a fine, healthy lass, BTW.
Weight is roughly proportional to volume, which varies roughly as height cubed, so you should take the ratio of weight to the cube of the height. If you are 73.5 inches tall and have the same ratio as the Jello pudding child, then your weight would be 244 pounds, and you should probably go easy on the pudding.TheConfessor wrote:I assume and trust that is healthy and normal. I'm just thinking that if I had the same weight to height ratio, I'd weigh about 57 pounds. But I'd probably be dead long before I reached that point.Appa23 wrote: The stats:
35.5 inches; 27.5 pounds.
Damn. Now I want pudding and there's none in the house.smilergrogan wrote:
Weight is roughly proportional to volume, which varies roughly as height cubed, so you should take the ratio of weight to the cube of the height. If you are 73.5 inches tall and have the same ratio as the Jello pudding child, then your weight would be 244 pounds, and you should probably go easy on the pudding.