The forum for general posting. Come join the madness.

-
Tocqueville3
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:39 am
- Location: Mississippi
#76
Post
by Tocqueville3 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:12 pm
Bob78164 wrote:TheCalvinator24 wrote:In fact, I think [Palin] might be the best pick Senator McCain could have made.
I'm wondering, Cal, whether you still stand by this statement. --Bob
I don't speak for Cal, but we are both pretty conservative.
I don't think that McCain could have picked anyone better.
I know that liberals have trouble believing that but as far as this election goes, Sarah Palin was the best choice for John McCain's running mate. A lot of my opinion has to do with John McCain. She is a good fit with him. She might not be as good a fit with some other republicans but she is a great fit on his ticket.
If I were Joe Biden right now, I would be nervous.
-
Bob Juch
- Posts: 27106
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
-
Contact:
#77
Post
by Bob Juch » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:14 pm
Tocqueville3 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:TheCalvinator24 wrote:In fact, I think [Palin] might be the best pick Senator McCain could have made.
I'm wondering, Cal, whether you still stand by this statement. --Bob
I don't speak for Cal, but we are both pretty conservative.
I don't think that McCain could have picked anyone better.
I know that liberals have trouble believing that but as far as this election goes, Sarah Palin was the best choice for John McCain's running mate. A lot of my opinion has to do with John McCain. She is a good fit with him. She might not be as good a fit with some other republicans but she is a great fit on his ticket.
If I were Joe Biden right now, I would be nervous.
She was a Hail Mary pass. The game's not over yet.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
-
Tocqueville3
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:39 am
- Location: Mississippi
#78
Post
by Tocqueville3 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:16 pm
Bob Juch wrote:Tocqueville3 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:I'm wondering, Cal, whether you still stand by this statement. --Bob
I don't speak for Cal, but we are both pretty conservative.
I don't think that McCain could have picked anyone better.
I know that liberals have trouble believing that but as far as this election goes, Sarah Palin was the best choice for John McCain's running mate. A lot of my opinion has to do with John McCain. She is a good fit with him. She might not be as good a fit with some other republicans but she is a great fit on his ticket.
If I were Joe Biden right now, I would be nervous.
She was a Hail Mary pass. The game's not over yet.
Really? No kidding.
-
Rexer25
- It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
- Posts: 2899
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: Just this side of nowhere
#79
Post
by Rexer25 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:25 pm
Tocqueville3 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:TheCalvinator24 wrote:In fact, I think [Palin] might be the best pick Senator McCain could have made.
I'm wondering, Cal, whether you still stand by this statement. --Bob
I don't speak for Cal, but we are both pretty conservative.
I don't think that McCain could have picked anyone better.
I know that liberals have trouble believing that but as far as this election goes, Sarah Palin was the best choice for John McCain's running mate. A lot of my opinion has to do with John McCain. She is a good fit with him. She might not be as good a fit with some other republicans but she is a great fit on his ticket.
If I were Joe Biden right now, I would be nervous.
I'm not asking to be argumentative, but why do you think Biden should be nervous? Because of the debate, or because a lot of people think he should be replaced on the ticket? Or something else?
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!
That'll be $10, please.
-
danielh41
- Posts: 1219
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:36 am
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
-
Contact:
#80
Post
by danielh41 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:44 pm
Rexer25 wrote:Tocqueville3 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:I'm wondering, Cal, whether you still stand by this statement. --Bob
I don't speak for Cal, but we are both pretty conservative.
I don't think that McCain could have picked anyone better.
I know that liberals have trouble believing that but as far as this election goes, Sarah Palin was the best choice for John McCain's running mate. A lot of my opinion has to do with John McCain. She is a good fit with him. She might not be as good a fit with some other republicans but she is a great fit on his ticket.
If I were Joe Biden right now, I would be nervous.
I'm not asking to be argumentative, but why do you think Biden should be nervous? Because of the debate, or because a lot of people think he should be replaced on the ticket? Or something else?
I think Biden should be nervous because of the debate coupled with some of the boneheaded things he has said in recent weeks, i.e. his comments about the ad his campaign ran about McCain's computer skills, his statement about AIG, his difference of opinion with Obama about coal mines, etc. These kinds of things just show that he doesn't think before he speaks. I think Sarah will take advantage of that.
-
Tocqueville3
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:39 am
- Location: Mississippi
#81
Post
by Tocqueville3 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:46 pm
Rexer25 wrote:Tocqueville3 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:I'm wondering, Cal, whether you still stand by this statement. --Bob
I don't speak for Cal, but we are both pretty conservative.
I don't think that McCain could have picked anyone better.
I know that liberals have trouble believing that but as far as this election goes, Sarah Palin was the best choice for John McCain's running mate. A lot of my opinion has to do with John McCain. She is a good fit with him. She might not be as good a fit with some other republicans but she is a great fit on his ticket.
If I were Joe Biden right now, I would be nervous.
I'm not asking to be argumentative, but why do you think Biden should be nervous? Because of the debate, or because a lot of people think he should be replaced on the ticket? Or something else?
Because Biden has a way of appearing rude and condescending (shocker!) and if he's not careful Sarah Palin will come across as looking like a woman of the people and he'll come across looking like a rude, elitist snob.
She has a way, and I really can't put my finger on the right terminology, of being tough as nails and being warm at the same time. She can cut her political opponent right in two and still give off a feeling of motherlyness.
I'm sure he's got some zingers up his sleeve but he need not take her lightly. She could, quite possibly, chew him up and spit him out all without messing up her lipstick.
Last edited by
Tocqueville3 on Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
danielh41
- Posts: 1219
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:36 am
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
-
Contact:
#82
Post
by danielh41 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:46 pm
danielh41 wrote:Rexer25 wrote:Tocqueville3 wrote:
I don't speak for Cal, but we are both pretty conservative.
I don't think that McCain could have picked anyone better.
I know that liberals have trouble believing that but as far as this election goes, Sarah Palin was the best choice for John McCain's running mate. A lot of my opinion has to do with John McCain. She is a good fit with him. She might not be as good a fit with some other republicans but she is a great fit on his ticket.
If I were Joe Biden right now, I would be nervous.
I'm not asking to be argumentative, but why do you think Biden should be nervous? Because of the debate, or because a lot of people think he should be replaced on the ticket? Or something else?
I think Biden should be nervous because of the debate coupled with some of the boneheaded things he has said in recent weeks, i.e. his comments about the ad his campaign ran about McCain's computer skills, his statement about AIG, his difference of opinion with Obama about coal mines, etc. These kinds of things just show that he doesn't think before he speaks. I think Sarah will take advantage of that.
I should have said that it's Obama supporters who should be nervous about Biden. I don't think Biden himself is bright enough to be nervous...
-
TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
-
Contact:
#83
Post
by TheCalvinator24 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:51 pm
Yes, I still believe that Governor Palin was the best possible pick for Senator McCain. It might not result in a victory, but it won't be because of her.
The latest financial debacle may have been the blow from which the McCain campaign cannot recover.
The other women whose names are constantly floated would not have had the same positives. They wouldn't have had the same negatives, either, but each of them had greater negatives than positives.
The men who could have been chosen also did not not have the net potential benefit that Palin provided.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
-
themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
#84
Post
by themanintheseersuckersuit » Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:05 pm
The Democratic Party of the United States has put Nancy Pelosi and Robert Byrd 2 and 3 heartbeats away from the Oval Office and yet still criticize Palin, go figure
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
-
tlynn78
- Posts: 9559
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:31 am
- Location: Montana
#85
Post
by tlynn78 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:11 pm
The Democratic Party of the United States has put Nancy Pelosi and Robert Byrd 2 and 3 heartbeats away from the Oval Office and yet still criticize Palin, go figure
rec rec rec rec rec
t.
When reality requires approval, control replaces truth.
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. -Thomas Paine
You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. -Ayn Rand
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
-
Bob Juch
- Posts: 27106
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
-
Contact:
#86
Post
by Bob Juch » Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:31 pm
themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:The Democratic Party of the United States has put Nancy Pelosi and Robert Byrd 2 and 3 heartbeats away from the Oval Office and yet still criticize Palin, go figure
The only way Pelosi could become President would be if Bush and Cheney were killed at the same time.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
-
TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
-
Contact:
#87
Post
by TheCalvinator24 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:35 pm
Bob Juch wrote:themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:The Democratic Party of the United States has put Nancy Pelosi and Robert Byrd 2 and 3 heartbeats away from the Oval Office and yet still criticize Palin, go figure
The only way Pelosi could become President would be if Bush and Cheney were killed at the same time.
You really don't know nearly as much as you think you do.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
-
Tocqueville3
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:39 am
- Location: Mississippi
#88
Post
by Tocqueville3 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:38 pm
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Bob Juch wrote:themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:The Democratic Party of the United States has put Nancy Pelosi and Robert Byrd 2 and 3 heartbeats away from the Oval Office and yet still criticize Palin, go figure
The only way Pelosi could become President would be if Bush and Cheney were killed at the same time.
You really don't know nearly as much as you think you do.
REC!!
-
Bob Juch
- Posts: 27106
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
-
Contact:
#89
Post
by Bob Juch » Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:41 pm
TheCalvinator24 wrote:Bob Juch wrote:themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:The Democratic Party of the United States has put Nancy Pelosi and Robert Byrd 2 and 3 heartbeats away from the Oval Office and yet still criticize Palin, go figure
The only way Pelosi could become President would be if Bush and Cheney were killed at the same time.
You really don't know nearly as much as you think you do.
Oh? Ever hear of the 25th Amendment?
Only if the President died, was succeeded by the VP, and then the new President died before the new VP could be confirmed, could the Speaker become President.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
-
Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22147
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
#90
Post
by Bob78164 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:49 pm
Bob Juch wrote:TheCalvinator24 wrote:Bob Juch wrote:
The only way Pelosi could become President would be if Bush and Cheney were killed at the same time.
You really don't know nearly as much as you think you do.
Oh? Ever hear of the 25th Amendment?
Only if the President died, was succeeded by the VP, and then the new President died before the new VP could be confirmed, could the Speaker become President.
This is almost accurate (you didn't include resignation or removal from office). It's different, though, from what you wrote the first time.
All of this begs the question, though. There's plenty of room for disagreement with the Congressional leadership on issues of policy. As far as I know, though, no one has accused them of being
out of
their league on a national stage. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
-
TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
-
Contact:
#91
Post
by TheCalvinator24 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:50 pm
Bob Juch wrote:TheCalvinator24 wrote:Bob Juch wrote:
The only way Pelosi could become President would be if Bush and Cheney were killed at the same time.
You really don't know nearly as much as you think you do.
Oh? Ever hear of the 25th Amendment?
Only if the President died, was succeeded by the VP, and then the new President died before the new VP could be confirmed, could the Speaker become President.
Exactly, which is directly contrary to your previous post. Well, not "exactly" because there are at least 2 other circumstances I can think of off the top of my head that would result in the SotH becoming President.
The first is the situation you described in your prior post.
The second, I'll leave for you to figure out.
Thank you for proving my point.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
-
TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
-
Contact:
#92
Post
by TheCalvinator24 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:53 pm
And Bob##### provides the information to get me to 19 ways it could happen.
Admittedly, none of them in the high probability range, but extant nonetheless.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
-
SportsFan68
- No Scritches!!!
- Posts: 21300
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
- Location: God's Country
#93
Post
by SportsFan68 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:48 pm
I cannot stand the idea of Palin being VP, but the right wing is still drooling over her, and despite one conservative columnist calling for her to step down, she is still bringing both light and heat to McCain's campaign. Pundits all over the country, instead of egging Biden on to a GO! FIGHT! WIN! knockout punch, are urging caution in his approach Thursday night. They think that he has the best chance of being on the losing end of somebody's signature here -- "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." They think that after two solid days of prepping, much like her acceptance speech, she will be the one watching Biden make a mistake, not the other way around.
In other words, I still think she was McCain's best possible pick. And I will continue to think so unless the VP debate demonstrates the same (or worse) command of the facts and inability to express McCain's positions that she showed with Couric.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller
-
themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
#94
Post
by themanintheseersuckersuit » Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:27 pm
Bob78164 wrote:
All of this begs the question, though. There's plenty of room for disagreement with the Congressional leadership on issues of policy. As far as I know, though, no one has accused them of being
out of
their league on a national stage. --Bob
Pelosi in SyriaWASHINGTON — An apparently botched message during a widely discouraged visit by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to Syria this week has U.S. officials criticizing rogue efforts at diplomacy among U.S. politicians.
State Department officials said Thursday they made it quite clear they did not want Pelosi to visit Syria, a nation that is listed as a state sponsor of terror and is home to terror group Hezbollah, which started a low-grade war with Israel last summer.
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
-
Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22147
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
#95
Post
by Bob78164 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:29 pm
themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:The Democratic Party of the United States has put Nancy Pelosi and Robert Byrd 2 and 3 heartbeats away from the Oval Office and yet still criticize Palin, go figure
The primary job of Congressional leadership is
not their position in the line of succession. It's exceedingly unlikely that the line of succession would ever get beyond the Vice President.
On the other hand, being ready to assume office as President in virtually the Vice President's only job.
And didn't the Republican Party name Strom Thurmond as President Pro Tem of the Senate when it controlled that chamber? --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
-
Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22147
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
#96
Post
by Bob78164 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:31 pm
Bob Juch wrote:TheCalvinator24 wrote:Bob Juch wrote:
The only way Pelosi could become President would be if Bush and Cheney were killed at the same time.
You really don't know nearly as much as you think you do.
Oh? Ever hear of the 25th Amendment?
Only if the President died, was succeeded by the VP, and then the new President died before the new VP could be confirmed, could the Speaker become President.
By the way, it's not the Twenty-Fifth Amendment that provides the line of succession. It's an Act of Congress, passed pursuant to authority granted under the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
-
TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
-
Contact:
#97
Post
by TheCalvinator24 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:25 pm
Bob78164 wrote:themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:The Democratic Party of the United States has put Nancy Pelosi and Robert Byrd 2 and 3 heartbeats away from the Oval Office and yet still criticize Palin, go figure
The primary job of Congressional leadership is
not their position in the line of succession. It's exceedingly unlikely that the line of succession would ever get beyond the Vice President.
On the other hand, being ready to assume office as President in virtually the Vice President's only job.
And didn't the Republican Party name Strom Thurmond as President Pro Tem of the Senate when it controlled that chamber? --Bob
Despite my pokes at BobJuch earlier, I agree with Bob##### that the fitness for Presidency argument is pretty weak when you get past the Veep. If fitness for the Presidency were a valid requirement, under that theory, we would have to apply it to every cabinet position that is listed in the line of succession.
The chance of anyone past the Veep ascending to the Presidency is so remote as to be virtually non-existent.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
-
Bob Juch
- Posts: 27106
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
-
Contact:
#98
Post
by Bob Juch » Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:33 pm
If you want to complicate things, get lawyers involved.

I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
-
gsabc
- Posts: 6496
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
- Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
-
Contact:
#99
Post
by gsabc » Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:11 am
TheCalvinator24 wrote:If fitness for the Presidency were a valid requirement, under that theory, we would have to apply it to every cabinet position that is listed in the line of succession.
Yeah, I remember when John Volpe, former governor of MA, was secretary of transportation for Nixon. That was when I first learned about the succession rules, and figured out that he was 13th in line for the presidency. Not a comforting thought.
I just ordered chicken and an egg from Amazon. I'll let you know.
-
BigDrawMan
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:17 pm
- Location: paris of the appalachians
#100
Post
by BigDrawMan » Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:19 am
Tocqueville3 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:TheCalvinator24 wrote:In fact, I think [Palin] might be the best pick Senator McCain could have made.
I'm wondering, Cal, whether you still stand by this statement. --Bob
I don't speak for Cal, but we are both pretty conservative.
I don't think that McCain could have picked anyone better.
---------------
the former Miss Tenn South Carolina comes to mind.
US Americans could get behind that.
I know that liberals have trouble believing that but as far as this election goes, Sarah Palin was the best choice for John McCain's running mate. A lot of my opinion has to do with John McCain. She is a good fit with him. She might not be as good a fit with some other republicans but she is a great fit on his ticket.
--------------
I agree.She has W's air of incompetence which "some" people like in their leaders.
If I were Joe Biden right now, I would be nervous.
-----
she is quite the orator, to be sure.
I dont torture mallards all the time, but when I do, I prefer waterboarding.
-Carl the Duck