Nebraska 'safe haven' sad story 9 siblings dropped off!

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Snaxx
Posts: 4671
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:24 pm
Location: I've been everywhere. Really? Not quite really.
Contact:

Nebraska 'safe haven' sad story 9 siblings dropped off!

#1 Post by Snaxx » Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:21 pm

I may have noticed this because our Frogman also has ten kids, but is more fortunate than this clan that made the news:

Nebraska dad... says he was overwhelmed.

An out-of-work widower abandoned nine of his ten children, aged 1 to 17. Nebraska law may be changed to allow only infant dropoffs.
---
Winner of 2011 Sports Madness :mrgreen:

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#2 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:20 am

My heart goes out to that dad and to his kids.

The article says some relatives have come forward now. I wonder how things could have been different if the dad had asked or the relatives had volunteered earlier. Could have saved some trauma to those kids, and to the dad.

and..... changing the law to only infants? wtf?

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27106
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

#3 Post by Bob Juch » Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:29 am

I wish you could drop off 35 year old daughters.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#4 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:38 am

Bob Juch wrote:I wish you could drop off 35 year old daughters.
Sorry, Bob - but this really made me laugh.

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

#5 Post by Appa23 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:19 am

peacock2121 wrote:My heart goes out to that dad and to his kids.

The article says some relatives have come forward now. I wonder how things could have been different if the dad had asked or the relatives had volunteered earlier. Could have saved some trauma to those kids, and to the dad.

and..... changing the law to only infants? wtf?
I can not tell if you have a question about changing it only to infants?

I previously had posted about this law. A "Safe Haven" law was long overdue in Nebraska, but things got muddled in the Unicameral, especially once "lame duck" State Senator Ernie Chambers became involved. At this point, there has not yet been a case where a young mother has utilized the law for a recently-delivered child, which is the purpose of a Safe Haven law.

There is considerable public debate on this topic. Some are saying that the expanded law is good, as it is allowing these kids to get out of a household that is not beneficial to them. Detractors point out that there already were methods and policies to handle such situations.

I was a big proponent of getting a Safe Haven law passed in Nebraska. My only hope is that this current "circus" does not cause a rejection of the underlying purpose: to let young mothers know that they do not need to have a child secretly and then abandon that child in a rest room or field, for example.

User avatar
minimetoo26
Royal Pain In Everyone's Ass
Posts: 7874
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:51 am
Location: No Fixed Address

#6 Post by minimetoo26 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:24 am

I like the way it turned out. It gave a desperate person an option and might have educated some others about other options. He really tried to do what was best for the kids rather than starve them or beat them or abandon them some place unsafe like what may have happened if not for the "flawed" law.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#7 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:24 am

circus?!?

circus?!?

A family in pain and you call it a circus?

really?

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#8 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:26 am

what mini said.

She was not as outraged as me

It always comes out better when outrage is not present.

User avatar
minimetoo26
Royal Pain In Everyone's Ass
Posts: 7874
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:51 am
Location: No Fixed Address

#9 Post by minimetoo26 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:28 am

peacock2121 wrote:what mini said.

She was not as outraged as me

It always comes out better when outrage is not present.
Yeah, but you don't get the TV contracts my way.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#10 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:30 am

minimetoo26 wrote:
peacock2121 wrote:what mini said.

She was not as outraged as me

It always comes out better when outrage is not present.
Yeah, but you don't get the TV contracts my way.
LOL - that is true.

User avatar
Appa23
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm

#11 Post by Appa23 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:25 am

peacock2121 wrote:circus?!?

circus?!?

A family in pain and you call it a circus?

really?
I am not calling the turning over of kids a "circus". I am calling the media's reaction (local and national) to all of the teenagers being left at hospitals a "circus".

One of the things that the article did not note was that the mother apparently was a bit "off". Despite the family's financial problems, she actively pursued having kids. She had a stroke right after having thier last child, and then died a few months later.

It is a sad story. However, it was uplifting to hear how the teenage daughter was able to care for her siblings and still remain devoted enough to her schoolwork to be on track to graduate early from high school.

Post Reply