wbtravis007 wrote:silvercamaro wrote:wbtravis007 wrote:
I'm wondering what you have seen or heard from Obama along the lines of a claim that his work was either particularly difficult or provided executive experience.
I don't know if Obama himself has stated such a claim. Some of his supporters have, though. Detractors of Sarah Palin were quick to say (I'm paraphrasing), "She doesn't have enough executive experience to be vice president." Her supporters answered, "She has more executive experience than Obama." The Obama camp responded (and, yes, I'm still paraphrasing,) "Obama's time as a community organizer provided him with executive experience." Never mind that they were trying to say that their presidential candidate was nearly as well qualified, in that sense, as the opposition's vice presidential candidate, but I thought it was a weak argument under any circumstances.
Nevertheless, as Frank Tangredi pointed out with eloquence, history has proven that such experience is not the most important factor in whether any individual will make a good president. Still, this thread was about community organizing, so that is the specific topic I was addressing.
Okay. I guess that we agree, then, that all this "executive experience" stuff is riidiculous. There are tens of millions of people who have more of that than any of these four.
If I had to guess, I'd say that at least a few million people in this country could have delivered the speech that Palin gave as well as she did.
I think that anybody who thinks that I'm wrong about that should get out more.
Obama's been in the crucible for the last couple of years, at least. That says a lot.
She's in a cocoon, at least for now.
I'm going to be lazy here an just quote myself from last week here:
Well, now I've seen her and heard her I can say with certainty that if she had sought any party's nomination for President she wouldn't have gotten very far.
Not so with Obama.
I think that a lot of people adopted the notion that Obama is an "empty suit" (or whatever) for a lot of different reasons. I think that many of those people have continued to assume that that's true, to the extent that they just quit paying attention to him -- not wanting to watch the Democrats' convention and what not.
I have seen a lot of those people dismiss people who have paid close attention to this and support Obama as "Kool-Aid drinkers" (or whatever).
Talk about arrogant! And insulting.
I wish that the people who fit that description would consider the possibility that those of us who have paid close attention and drawn a different conclusion about the man than they have are seeing something that they haven't seen, for whatever reason, and aren't just being hoodwinked.
I don't drink Kool-Aid. I just think that it would be good for the country to elect Obama President.
And, I think he's ready.
People are comparing those of us who have come to that conclusion to people who know little about Palin but would say that she's as ready to be President as Obama is, and saying there's no difference between us.
Talk about dumb!
You start thinking some people are kind of smart, and then see stuff like that.
I swannee.