An Impertinent question (may turn political)
- mrkelley23
- Posts: 6601
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:48 pm
- Location: Somewhere between Bureaucracy and Despair
An Impertinent question (may turn political)
Many of my friends are saying that Muslims should not be tarred with the brush of extremists, that these few criminals are not representative of the whole and therefore the peaceful Muslims should not be held accountable for their actions.
Many of the same friends were outraged several months ago when the #NotAllMen movement started.
Many of the same friends thought, several years ago, that the President of the United States should issue an official apology from America to every American of African extraction for slavery.
Can someone explain to me how these last two concepts are different from the first?
Many of the same friends were outraged several months ago when the #NotAllMen movement started.
Many of the same friends thought, several years ago, that the President of the United States should issue an official apology from America to every American of African extraction for slavery.
Can someone explain to me how these last two concepts are different from the first?
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled. -- Richard Feynman
- Flybrick
- Posts: 1570
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:44 am
Re: An Impertinent question (may turn political)
'Cuz Al Sharpton's gots to get paid...
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 16669
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22159
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: An Impertinent question (may turn political)
I'm not familiar with the #NotAllMen movement.mrkelley23 wrote:Many of my friends are saying that Muslims should not be tarred with the brush of extremists, that these few criminals are not representative of the whole and therefore the peaceful Muslims should not be held accountable for their actions.
Many of the same friends were outraged several months ago when the #NotAllMen movement started.
Many of the same friends thought, several years ago, that the President of the United States should issue an official apology from America to every American of African extraction for slavery.
Can someone explain to me how these last two concepts are different from the first?
But the preservation of slavery was, at one time, the official policy of the United States of America, most notoriously in the form of the Fugitive Slave Act. It makes sense to apologize for that, just as it made sense to apologize for the interment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. Not because every American is or was personally responsible, but because via official action we fell short of our ideals. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- BackInTex
- Posts: 13737
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
Re: An Impertinent question (may turn political)
Bob78164 wrote:I'm not familiar with the #NotAllMen movement.mrkelley23 wrote:Many of my friends are saying that Muslims should not be tarred with the brush of extremists, that these few criminals are not representative of the whole and therefore the peaceful Muslims should not be held accountable for their actions.
Many of the same friends were outraged several months ago when the #NotAllMen movement started.
Many of the same friends thought, several years ago, that the President of the United States should issue an official apology from America to every American of African extraction for slavery.
Can someone explain to me how these last two concepts are different from the first?
But the preservation of slavery was, at one time, the official policy of the United States of America, most notoriously in the form of the Fugitive Slave Act. It makes sense to apologize for that, just as it made sense to apologize for the interment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. Not because every American is or was personally responsible, but because via official action we fell short of our ideals. --Bob
I'm sorry.
There, now its done. Can we move on now??
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22159
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
Re: An Impertinent question (may turn political)
Did you get elected President while I wasn't looking? Or maybe you were apologizing on behalf of Texas for George W. Bush.BackInTex wrote:Bob78164 wrote:I'm not familiar with the #NotAllMen movement.mrkelley23 wrote:Many of my friends are saying that Muslims should not be tarred with the brush of extremists, that these few criminals are not representative of the whole and therefore the peaceful Muslims should not be held accountable for their actions.
Many of the same friends were outraged several months ago when the #NotAllMen movement started.
Many of the same friends thought, several years ago, that the President of the United States should issue an official apology from America to every American of African extraction for slavery.
Can someone explain to me how these last two concepts are different from the first?
But the preservation of slavery was, at one time, the official policy of the United States of America, most notoriously in the form of the Fugitive Slave Act. It makes sense to apologize for that, just as it made sense to apologize for the interment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. Not because every American is or was personally responsible, but because via official action we fell short of our ideals. --Bob
I'm sorry.
There, now its done. Can we move on now??
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: An Impertinent question (may turn political)
Did you get elected President while I wasn't looking? Or maybe you were apologizing on behalf of Texas for George W. Bush.
Its sad when people forget history.
600,000 killed wounded captured or missing
13th and 14th amendments
Its sad when people forget history.
600,000 killed wounded captured or missing
13th and 14th amendments
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.