Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
- minimetoo26
- Royal Pain In Everyone's Ass
- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:51 am
- Location: No Fixed Address
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
Shrill? 
Knowing a great deal is not the same as being smart; intelligence is not information alone but also judgment, the manner in which information is collected and used.
-Carl Sagan
-Carl Sagan
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 24615
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
It's interesting that there wasn't similar acclaim when Clarence Thomas was named to the Supreme Court, when Colin Powell and Condi Rice were named Secretary of States, or when Michael Steele, Lynn Swann and Ken Blackwell ran for governors. While the media has been peeing in its pants in its efforts to turn Obama into the second Abe Lincoln, there was silence or condemnation for what those others I mentioned had accomplished. Claims that Clarence Thomas was unqualified (and I do think he is well qualified for the Supreme Court in terms of intellect, although his answers to a lot of questions about what opinions he had formed were debatable) were par for the course.franktangredi wrote: As for #1 -- it was certainly not directed at you unless you really believe that it is a bad thing to elect any African American to the presidency. (Reread what I said, please. It had nothing to do with Barack Obama, it had to do with America.) I do not believe you are a bigot if you oppose Obama. I do believe you are one if you oppose elected any African American (or Jew or Catholic or Mormon or Arab or Italian ....)
Obama's election is an advance for us as a nation in terms of racial tolerance. I don't know of anyone other than a handful of the worst degenerates out there who thinks that the days of lynch mobs and Jim Crow were the "good old days." But I feel that a large part of the adulation and self-congratulation that people are doing is in equal part due to their perception that Obama is a liberal who will bring "change we can believe in."
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- ne1410s
- Posts: 2961
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
- Location: The Friendly Confines
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
frank:
Frank, no good deed or intention EVER goes unpunished...Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."
- minimetoo26
- Royal Pain In Everyone's Ass
- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:51 am
- Location: No Fixed Address
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?
Why? Be yourself. Don't let the shouters change you into what they want you to be.
Knowing a great deal is not the same as being smart; intelligence is not information alone but also judgment, the manner in which information is collected and used.
-Carl Sagan
-Carl Sagan
- franktangredi
- Posts: 6678
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:34 pm
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
It's not that. It's that it has become an occasion for acrimony, and I was at least partly responsible for that. And that doesn't make me happy.minimetoo26 wrote:franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?
Why? Be yourself. Don't let the shouters change you into what they want you to be.
But maybe you're right. Maybe my new motto should be POMPOUS AND PROUD OF IT!
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 24615
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
Does anyone on this Bored really think there aren't a whole lot of people in this country who have sky-high expectations about what they think Obama is going to accomplish?minimetoo26 wrote:I think sss post with the term "about to" was the one jumping to conclusions. But I guess he gets a free pass since you agree with him, huh?
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com
- TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
- Contact:
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
Although the "shame on you" parts of the original post could have been omitted, I want to say that I agree with everything frank wrote. Even the "shame on you"s.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
- Tocqueville3
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:39 am
- Location: Mississippi
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
Oh please.minimetoo26 wrote:Shrill?
You're the one who asked.
"I would drape myself in velvet if it were socially acceptable."
--George Costanza
--George Costanza
- ne1410s
- Posts: 2961
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
- Location: The Friendly Confines
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
sss:
George W Bush has set the bar so low for so long that expectations do not have to be "sky-high". About chin high should do it.Does anyone on this Bored really think there aren't a whole lot of people in this country who have sky-high expectations about what they think Obama is going to accomplish?
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."
- minimetoo26
- Royal Pain In Everyone's Ass
- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:51 am
- Location: No Fixed Address
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
SOME people have sky-high expectations about every incoming president. Here we tend to be more reasoned and rational.silverscreenselect wrote:Does anyone on this Bored really think there aren't a whole lot of people in this country who have sky-high expectations about what they think Obama is going to accomplish?minimetoo26 wrote:I think sss post with the term "about to" was the one jumping to conclusions. But I guess he gets a free pass since you agree with him, huh?
Well, SOME of us. Others seem unnaturally bitter, and others overoptimistic. But as of today he is the president, and we'll have to deal with that and hope for the best.
Which is what Frank said and got his head bitten off for saying it.
Knowing a great deal is not the same as being smart; intelligence is not information alone but also judgment, the manner in which information is collected and used.
-Carl Sagan
-Carl Sagan
- WheresFanny
- ???????
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:24 am
- Location: Hello Kitty Paradise
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
Don't go to all that trouble, Frank. You can fix that post in three easy steps:minimetoo26 wrote:franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?
Why? Be yourself. Don't let the shouters change you into what they want you to be.
1. Edit your post to add "In my opinion" to the beginning (or the end).
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic!
3. Read it over and make sure you didn't use the word "clearly" anywhere.
Viola!
Last edited by WheresFanny on Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
We, the HK Brigade, do hereby salute you, Marley, for your steadfast devotion to ontopicosity. Well done, sir!
- TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
- Contact:
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
And ne1410s wins the "who will post the first slam of George W. Bush in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with him?" contest
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
- franktangredi
- Posts: 6678
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:34 pm
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
Of course there are! Some people are incredibly unrealistic. That neither validates nor invalidates the fact that all your expectations are in the opposite direction.silverscreenselect wrote:Does anyone on this Bored really think there aren't a whole lot of people in this country who have sky-high expectations about what they think Obama is going to accomplish?minimetoo26 wrote:I think sss post with the term "about to" was the one jumping to conclusions. But I guess he gets a free pass since you agree with him, huh?
I know that some Obama supporters will have disappointments ahead. You should be hoping for pleasant surprises.
- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27966
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
You can edit your own posts, but you can't delete the thread, which includes quoted portions of your original text. Everyone else who posted would have to edit their own posts.franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?
A moderator might have the power to delete the thread, but the general consensus has been to avoid heavy-handed moderation of that sort.
- franktangredi
- Posts: 6678
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:34 pm
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
What does this mean?WheresFanny wrote:
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic!![]()
- ne1410s
- Posts: 2961
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
- Location: The Friendly Confines
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
cal:
I don't write the jokes: they write themselves.
One cannot type "George W Bush" without having it be a slam. Kinda like "Warren G Harding".And ne1410s wins the "who will post the first slam of George W. Bush in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with him?" contest
I don't write the jokes: they write themselves.
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."
- Tocqueville3
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:39 am
- Location: Mississippi
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
I think she means that Appa edits his posts. A lot. To say the least.franktangredi wrote:What does this mean?WheresFanny wrote:
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic!![]()
"I would drape myself in velvet if it were socially acceptable."
--George Costanza
--George Costanza
- WheresFanny
- ???????
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:24 am
- Location: Hello Kitty Paradise
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
franktangredi wrote:What does this mean?WheresFanny wrote:
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic!![]()
Also known as an Appa Pass or a Passive Aggressive Stick.
If you add an emoticon at the end, you can say whatever you want and nobody can disagree or take offense. Because you were j/k!
Some people seem to think so, anyway.
(I was actually just trying to add a little levity to the situation.)
Last edited by WheresFanny on Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
We, the HK Brigade, do hereby salute you, Marley, for your steadfast devotion to ontopicosity. Well done, sir!
- peacock2121
- Posts: 18451
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
That you want to do that says enough.franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?
- WheresFanny
- ???????
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:24 am
- Location: Hello Kitty Paradise
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
I didn't even think of that, but it plays as well.Tocqueville3 wrote:I think she means that Appa edits his posts. A lot. To say the least.franktangredi wrote:What does this mean?WheresFanny wrote:
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic!![]()
We, the HK Brigade, do hereby salute you, Marley, for your steadfast devotion to ontopicosity. Well done, sir!
- peacock2121
- Posts: 18451
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
This is very funny.WheresFanny wrote:Don't go to all that trouble, Frank. You can fix that post in three easy steps:minimetoo26 wrote:franktangredi wrote:Is there any way I can delete this entire thread and start over again with the edited sentiment?
Why? Be yourself. Don't let the shouters change you into what they want you to be.
1. Edit your post to add "In my opinion" to the beginning (or the end).![]()
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic!![]()
3. Read it over and make sure you didn't use the word "clearly" anywhere.![]()
Viola!
- tlynn78
- Posts: 9565
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:31 am
- Location: Montana
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
And ne1410s wins the "who will post the first slam of George W. Bush in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with him?" contest
Shirley, you're not surprised?
t.
When reality requires approval, control replaces truth.
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. -Thomas Paine
You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. -Ayn Rand
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. -Thomas Paine
You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. -Ayn Rand
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
- Jeemie
- Posts: 7303
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:35 pm
- Location: City of Champions Once More (Well, in spirit)!!!!
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
This thread should be left as a standing testament to Wintergreen's oft-repeated statement that our biases are most clearly revealed in our mistakes.
1979 City of Champions 2009
- PlacentiaSoccerMom
- Posts: 8134
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
- Location: Placentia, CA
- Contact:
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
Clearly, Fanny is correct!WheresFanny wrote:franktangredi wrote:What does this mean?WheresFanny wrote:
2. Give it a Holt Dad, they're magic!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Also known as an Appa Pass or a Passive Aggressive Stick.
If you add an emoticon at the end, you can say whatever you want and nobody can disagree or take offense. Because you were j/k!
- WheresFanny
- ???????
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:24 am
- Location: Hello Kitty Paradise
Re: Inauguration thoughts we should all be able to agree on
In your opinion. I think.PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:Clearly, Fanny is correct!WheresFanny wrote:franktangredi wrote: What does this mean?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Also known as an Appa Pass or a Passive Aggressive Stick.
If you add an emoticon at the end, you can say whatever you want and nobody can disagree or take offense. Because you were j/k!
We, the HK Brigade, do hereby salute you, Marley, for your steadfast devotion to ontopicosity. Well done, sir!