"An American Carol" movie review

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Flybrick
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:44 am

"An American Carol" movie review

#1 Post by Flybrick » Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:06 pm

Kinda.

I don't want to give it away but I encourage everyone to go see it. Not because it's particularly funny, but to just 'stick it' to Michael Moore and the uber-left. I'm hoping this thing makes a gagillion bucks to ram it down Moore's throat.

Made by the same guy that did "Airplane!" it's not as funny or witty. It's more obvious and slapstick, but there are some wickedly accurate imitations of losers and there are a few good lines.

It uses the premise from "A Christmas Carol" to educate the Michael Moore character on why he's such a schmuck.

There were also a couple of lines that really resonated. "We're not the bad guys," and "This is a war" in particular.

Two scenes made me feel especially proud - one in Afghanistan with a group of Army dudes in battle gear taking communion from a chaplain when incoming starts and they all man up and the ending with a line of soldiers through our history.

Please go see it and help stick it to the lunatic left (note, not the normal left or Democrats with a clue, but the ultra-crazies - 9/11 was an inside job, it's our fault for everything crowd).

User avatar
danielh41
Posts: 1219
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:36 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Contact:

#2 Post by danielh41 » Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:28 pm

I definitely plan on seeing it, not because I think it will be good, but just because I would like it to gross more than any Michael Moore movie ever did. I at least want it to do more business than that idiot Maher's new movie...

User avatar
geoffil
Posts: 1566
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:43 am
Location: Chicago

#3 Post by geoffil » Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:42 pm

I love the title. It has such a nice ring to it. :wink:

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

#4 Post by MarleysGh0st » Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:13 am

So who plays my role? :wink:

User avatar
Flybrick
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:44 am

#5 Post by Flybrick » Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:27 am

MarleysGh0st wrote:So who plays my role? :wink:
Kelsey Grammer as a pretty good Gen George S. Patton.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

#6 Post by MarleysGh0st » Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:41 am

Flybrick wrote:
MarleysGh0st wrote:So who plays my role? :wink:
Kelsey Grammer as a pretty good Gen George S. Patton.
General George S. Patton Marley...now there's a gh0st TPTB couldn't ignore! :twisted:

User avatar
Flybrick
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:44 am

#7 Post by Flybrick » Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:45 am

Actually, I stand corrected.

"Marley's Ghost" was personified by JFK telling the MM character he took the wrong part out his Inaugerial Address. That the US would 'bear any burden' was meant to be we'd fight for what we thought was right.

Still, having JFK character portray you ain't too shabby either!

And I bet TPTB would like him even better!

User avatar
Admiral Stockdale
Merry Man
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:24 am
Location: Here, but I don't know why!

#8 Post by Admiral Stockdale » Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:53 am

Flybrick wrote:Actually, I stand corrected.

"Marley's Ghost" was personified by JFK telling the MM character he took the wrong part out his Inaugerial Address. That the US would 'bear any burden' was meant to be we'd fight for what we thought was right.

Still, having JFK character portray you ain't too shabby either!

And I bet TPTB would like him even better!

I'm sorry Marley, but you're no Jack Kennedy!
Who am I?!?!?!?!? Why am I here!?!?!?

User avatar
SloppyDrunkGuy
Merry Man
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: At the (hic!) bar

#9 Post by SloppyDrunkGuy » Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:55 am

Admiral Stockdale wrote:
Flybrick wrote:Actually, I stand corrected.

"Marley's Ghost" was personified by JFK telling the MM character he took the wrong part out his Inaugerial Address. That the US would 'bear any burden' was meant to be we'd fight for what we thought was right.

Still, having JFK character portray you ain't too shabby either!

And I bet TPTB would like him even better!

I'm sorry Marley, but you're no Jack Kennedy!

(HIC!) I knew Jack Kennedy... (HIC!).. and... (HIC!) uh.... well, at least I did know him before I got plashtered... (HIC!) again (HIC, HIC!)...

Hey bartender! Another shhhhhotchhh! (HIC!)

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

Re: "An American Carol" movie review

#10 Post by peacock2121 » Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:51 am

Flybrick wrote:Kinda.

I don't want to give it away but I encourage everyone to go see it. Not because it's particularly funny, but to just 'stick it' to Michael Moore and the uber-left. I'm hoping this thing makes a gagillion bucks to ram it down Moore's throat.

Made by the same guy that did "Airplane!" it's not as funny or witty. It's more obvious and slapstick, but there are some wickedly accurate imitations of losers and there are a few good lines.

It uses the premise from "A Christmas Carol" to educate the Michael Moore character on why he's such a schmuck.

There were also a couple of lines that really resonated. "We're not the bad guys," and "This is a war" in particular.

Two scenes made me feel especially proud - one in Afghanistan with a group of Army dudes in battle gear taking communion from a chaplain when incoming starts and they all man up and the ending with a line of soldiers through our history.

Please go see it and help stick it to the lunatic left (note, not the normal left or Democrats with a clue, but the ultra-crazies - 9/11 was an inside job, it's our fault for everything crowd).
stick it to

ram it down the throat

schmuck

No thank you.

User avatar
NellyLunatic1980
Posts: 7935
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:54 am
Contact:

#11 Post by NellyLunatic1980 » Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:06 am

"An American Carol" grossed $3.8 million in its opening weekend. That's an average of $2,325 for each of the 1,639 theaters in which it plays. Compare that to the $24 million from only 868 theaters that "Fahrenheit 9/11" made on its opening weekend four years, it appears as though the American people will not "stick it to the lunatic left".

User avatar
littlebeast13
Dumbass
Posts: 31585
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
Contact:

#12 Post by littlebeast13 » Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:09 am

Where is our old friend MichaelMooreIsABigFatIdiot.....?

lb13

User avatar
NellyLunatic1980
Posts: 7935
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:54 am
Contact:

#13 Post by NellyLunatic1980 » Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:51 am

littlebeast13 wrote:Where is our old friend MichaelMooreIsABigFatIdiot.....?

lb13
Probably hanging out with RushLimbaughIsABigFatIdiot.

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

#14 Post by ne1410s » Mon Oct 06, 2008 8:14 am

nel:
Probably hanging out with RushLimbaughIsABigFatIdiot.
And with Rush's twin brother, RushLimbaughIsABigFatLiar.

shove this
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
ghostjmf
Posts: 7452
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:09 am

#15 Post by ghostjmf » Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:39 am

What I find really funny, though not in a ha-ha manner necessarily, is the very-short-list of very-right-wing big name actors in the film. I mean, hey, actors will take jobs playing characters they politically disagree with because, uh, its called "acting". But the director on this one nevertheless hedged their bets with political sympaticos. Gee, I wish the director doing the next in-depth profile of Hitler would go for that; it would make such projects, of which there have been way too many for my taste, that much harder to cast. I think.

I heard an interview with the director which got defrayed by static as I drove farther & farther away from the station. There was a bit of verbal interplay wherein the director got snarly about the word "surely" which I hope was all-in-pun, considering the "Airplane" legacy. Or "Naked Gun" legacy. Wherever "surely/Shirley" comes from. I missed the part, given in the intro, where the director's kids are supposedly made to feel bad at school for their parent's politics. That would be a low blow, if true.

User avatar
Flybrick
Posts: 1570
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:44 am

#16 Post by Flybrick » Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:35 pm

NellyLunatic1980 wrote:"An American Carol" grossed $3.8 million in its opening weekend. That's an average of $2,325 for each of the 1,639 theaters in which it plays. Compare that to the $24 million from only 868 theaters that "Fahrenheit 9/11" made on its opening weekend four years, it appears as though the American people will not "stick it to the lunatic left".
Ah, but "Fahrenheit 911" was a 'documentary.'*







* You had to see the movie to catch the humor.

User avatar
dimmzy
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:23 am

#17 Post by dimmzy » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:48 am

"An American Carol" grossed $3.8 million in its opening weekend.
Who can afford to go to the movies?

Poor timing on this.

Given that, the right has a right to make movies.

Too bad it's not wittier.

At the same time, Religulous is also a little pompous.

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24609
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: "An American Carol" movie review

#18 Post by silverscreenselect » Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:15 am

This is a bad movie, not because of its politics, but because it's simply not very funny and often in poor taste. Poor taste when it's funny is hilarious; just look at Monty Python. Poor taste when it's not funny can be grating.

This movie's idea of humor is Leslie Nielsen hitting a woman in the head with a Frisbee, one Arab terrorist flunky bashing another one's head into a wall (which happens about twenty times during the movie) or a kid on crutches accidentally being knocked down by the Michael Moore character (that happens three times in the movie). The political jokes were far too often preachy rather than funny.

Conseratives can be funny. Rush Limbaugh has a wicked sense of humor as evidenced by some of the spoofs he has run over the years. Usually however, they mistake cutting people and institutions down with humor. That's why there's never really been good right wing sketch humor (Fox put on a show a few months back and it was an absolute disaster).

Right wingers can and do write good thrillers. They may make a political point but they keep it within the bounds of the plot and the action. When liberals write thrillers, they tend to be talky and more concerned with scoring political points than having an entertaining plot.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

Post Reply