A question...Annie can answer maybe?

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
T_Bone0806
FNGD Forum Moderator
Posts: 6928
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:24 pm
Location: State of Confusion

A question...Annie can answer maybe?

#1 Post by T_Bone0806 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:13 pm

This just dawned on me...

We have the bored designations of two footers (those who walk on two feet) and four footers (those who walk on four feet).

I don't walk at all. I mean, I USED to be a two footer, but not anymore. Does that make me a no footer? Or a four wheeler? Or, since I sit on my rear end to get around, would I be a one butter? Or a two cheeker?

Where do I fit in? Do I belong at all? Am I a misfit like Rudolph and Hermie and that cowboy that rides an ostrich? Should I use an ostrich instead of a wheelchair? Do I have too much time to sit and think about stupid stuff like this? Do you know the way to San Jose?
"#$%&@*&"-Donald F. Duck

User avatar
a1mamacat
Posts: 7118
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Great White North

#2 Post by a1mamacat » Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:31 pm

you can be Professor T-Xavier... :lol:
Lover of Soft Animals and Fine Art
1st annual international BBBL Champeeeeen!

User avatar
T_Bone0806
FNGD Forum Moderator
Posts: 6928
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:24 pm
Location: State of Confusion

#3 Post by T_Bone0806 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:34 pm

a1mamacat wrote:you can be Professor T-Xavier... :lol:
Not bad, but I don't think I'd look so good bald.

Although at some point I may not have any choice :roll:
"#$%&@*&"-Donald F. Duck

User avatar
AnnieCamaro
Four-Footer
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Rainbow Bridge

#4 Post by AnnieCamaro » Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:39 pm

Mr. T, you are a two-footer. If you didn't have any legs at all, you would still be a two-footer. In your particular case, you're a two-footer on wheels. Being a two-footer or a four-footer is about attitude, not shoes or transportation.

But, do you have an ostrich you could ride? That would be so cool!

The way to San Jose from my house is to drive north on I-35, then turn west on I-40, then when you get somewhere near Los Angeles, then take a right and drive north on I-5 until you get there. I've never taken that route myself, but I'm going to ask my mom to drive me there, to make sure I'm giving you accurate directions.
Sou iu koto de.

User avatar
T_Bone0806
FNGD Forum Moderator
Posts: 6928
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:24 pm
Location: State of Confusion

#5 Post by T_Bone0806 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:24 pm

AnnieCamaro wrote:Mr. T, you are a two-footer. If you didn't have any legs at all, you would still be a two-footer. In your particular case, you're a two-footer on wheels. Being a two-footer or a four-footer is about attitude, not shoes or transportation.

But, do you have an ostrich you could ride? That would be so cool!

The way to San Jose from my house is to drive north on I-35, then turn west on I-40, then when you get somewhere near Los Angeles, then take a right and drive north on I-5 until you get there. I've never taken that route myself, but I'm going to ask my mom to drive me there, to make sure I'm giving you accurate directions.
Thank you Miss Annie. You are wise beyond your years.

I don't think they sell ostriches at the pet store in the mall, but maybe they can special order one.
"#$%&@*&"-Donald F. Duck

User avatar
ulysses5019
Purveyor of Avatars
Posts: 19442
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: A question...Annie can answer maybe?

#6 Post by ulysses5019 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:03 pm

T_Bone0806 wrote:This just dawned on me...

We have the bored designations of two footers (those who walk on two feet) and four footers (those who walk on four feet).

I don't walk at all. I mean, I USED to be a two footer, but not anymore. Does that make me a no footer? Or a four wheeler? Or, since I sit on my rear end to get around, would I be a one butter? Or a two cheeker?

Where do I fit in? Do I belong at all? Am I a misfit like Rudolph and Hermie and that cowboy that rides an ostrich? Should I use an ostrich instead of a wheelchair? Do I have too much time to sit and think about stupid stuff like this? Do you know the way to San Jose?

i think you should try murderball
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.

User avatar
AnnieCamaro
Four-Footer
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Rainbow Bridge

#7 Post by AnnieCamaro » Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:06 pm

Mr. T, I was wondering if you had any of those duct tape underoos, like Mr. Uly is wearing in his photograph?

I think it's nice when Mr. Uly uses his own photo for an avatar.

/:P\
Sou iu koto de.

User avatar
Beebs52
Queen of Wack
Posts: 16411
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Location.Location.Location

#8 Post by Beebs52 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:08 pm

You're an alternative footer. You may be whatever you want to be. Maybe a progressive footer.
Well, then

User avatar
cindy.wellman
LOLOLOL
Posts: 1641
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:42 pm
Location: Alaska

#9 Post by cindy.wellman » Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm

I agree with the 2-footer answer. As usual, that was a great answer, Annie. I giggled at the two-cheeker option though. :lol:

Fanny was involved in an interesting discussion about the island of misfit toys. If she sees this thread, I wonder if she'll remember it. I don't think her questions were ever resolved.

User avatar
AnnieCamaro
Four-Footer
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Rainbow Bridge

#10 Post by AnnieCamaro » Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:52 pm

Sigh. Mr. Uly changed his underwear.
Sou iu koto de.

User avatar
ulysses5019
Purveyor of Avatars
Posts: 19442
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#11 Post by ulysses5019 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:57 pm

AnnieCamaro wrote:Mr. T, I was wondering if you had any of those duct tape underoos, like Mr. Uly is wearing in his photograph?

I think it's nice when Mr. Uly uses his own photo for an avatar.

/:P\
what photograph
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.

User avatar
AnnieCamaro
Four-Footer
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Rainbow Bridge

#12 Post by AnnieCamaro » Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:04 pm

ulysses5019 wrote:
AnnieCamaro wrote:Mr. T, I was wondering if you had any of those duct tape underoos, like Mr. Uly is wearing in his photograph?

I think it's nice when Mr. Uly uses his own photo for an avatar.

/:P\
what photograph
The one that's #4 in the gallery here:

http://www.asylum.com/2008/09/04/25-ama ... duct-tape/

I couldn't figure out how to copy it, or it would be pasted right here for all the world to admire as much as I do.

/:P\
Sou iu koto de.

User avatar
ulysses5019
Purveyor of Avatars
Posts: 19442
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#13 Post by ulysses5019 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:38 pm

AnnieCamaro wrote:
ulysses5019 wrote:
AnnieCamaro wrote:Mr. T, I was wondering if you had any of those duct tape underoos, like Mr. Uly is wearing in his photograph?

I think it's nice when Mr. Uly uses his own photo for an avatar.

/:P\
what photograph
The one that's #4 in the gallery here:

http://www.asylum.com/2008/09/04/25-ama ... duct-tape/

I couldn't figure out how to copy it, or it would be pasted right here for all the world to admire as much as I do.

/:P\
i do not recall ever seeing let alone using said photograph
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.

User avatar
AnnieCamaro
Four-Footer
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Rainbow Bridge

#14 Post by AnnieCamaro » Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:05 am

ulysses5019 wrote:
AnnieCamaro wrote:
ulysses5019 wrote: what photograph
The one that's #4 in the gallery here:

http://www.asylum.com/2008/09/04/25-ama ... duct-tape/

I couldn't figure out how to copy it, or it would be pasted right here for all the world to admire as much as I do.

/:P\
i do not recall ever seeing let alone using said photograph
Oh. I get it.

I must have been mistaken, and all the people who saw that photograph here earlier tonight must have been mistaken, too. Unless they say they were not.

If I weren't mistaken, I would have noted that I thought it was a nice picture of you, even though we (the ones who are mistaken) like the photos of you where you are smiling the best. You have a very nice smile, which was not displayed to its best advantage, so to speak, in the photo that we mistakenly thought we saw, but perhaps didn't.

Two-footers are so complicated! I don't see how any of you manage to get along with each other. Dogs have it much easier. We have to remember only two basic interactions: Tail-waggy nice dog -- sniff. Fang-snarly mean dog -- run. It works for us.

/:P\
Sou iu koto de.

User avatar
Evil Squirrel
Merry Man
Posts: 1212
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:13 am
Location: Sprotsie Baby's back door!

#15 Post by Evil Squirrel » Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:08 am

AnnieCamaro wrote:Two-footers are so complicated! I don't see how any of you manage to get along with each other. Dogs have it much easier. We have to remember only two basic interactions: Tail-waggy nice dog -- sniff. Fang-snarly mean dog -- run. It works for us.

/:P\

I have just one basic interaction..... chuck and snicker.

~~/--\ :twisted:
Squirrels are the architects of forests, the planters of trees, nature's own acrobats and show a zest for life that can inspire us. Every day should be National Squirrel Appreciation Day!

--squirrelmama (10/3/07)

Many of these (squirrel) migrations were probably caused by food shortages as well as habitat overcrowding. We solved that for them. We not only reduced their habitat, we reduced the whole species by about 90%. The least we can do now is share a little birdseed with them.

--Richard E. Mallery

2008 Squirrel of the Year Award winner

User avatar
AnnieCamaro
Four-Footer
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Rainbow Bridge

#16 Post by AnnieCamaro » Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:12 am

Evil Squirrel wrote:
I have just one basic interaction..... chuck and snicker.
That is why the basic dog-squirrel interaction is bark and duck.
Sou iu koto de.

User avatar
cindy.wellman
LOLOLOL
Posts: 1641
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:42 pm
Location: Alaska

#17 Post by cindy.wellman » Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:17 am

I think it is very cute and clever that Annie found the hidden doggie smileys (emoticons?) on this board.

Post Reply