Democrats deny Colbert's ballot bid
Comedian Stephen Colbert’s whimsical bid to get on the 2008 ballot for president in his home state is a bust.
The South Carolina Democratic Party's executive committee decided Thursday Colbert would not be included on the ballot.
The S.C. Democratic Presidential Primary is scheduled to be held Jan. 26.
While Colbert, political satirist and self-proclaimed favorite son did not make the ballot, little known Henry Hewes of New York did.
Colbert collected the signatures required to be on the ballot and paid a filing fee.
No word yet of a write-in campaign, or if the Democrats plan to refund Colbert his $2,500 filing fee.
Colbert, host of Comedy Central’s "Colbert Report," toyed with running for president on the S.C. Republican Party’s primary ballot, too. But he reportedly decided to pass on the Republican's $25,000 filing fee.
http://thestatecom.typepad.com/ygatoday ... eny-c.html
I won't be voting for Steven Colbert
- themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7630
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
I won't be voting for Steven Colbert
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
- silvercamaro
- Dog's Best Friend
- Posts: 9608
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:45 am
- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27965
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: I won't be voting for Steven Colbert
Did he not collect sufficient signatures on his petitions or is this an arbitrary decision by the executive committee?themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:The South Carolina Democratic Party's executive committee decided Thursday Colbert would not be included on the ballot.
- earendel
- Posts: 13834
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
- Location: mired in the bureaucracy
Re: I won't be voting for Steven Colbert
It was a decision by the executive committee. I'm of two minds about this - I think he should have the right to run if he meets the requisite requirements. But BTST he is doing it for the entertainment value, not because he has a realistic shot at winning, and in so doing is making a mockery of the electoral process (some might say it's too late for that).MarleysGh0st wrote:Did he not collect sufficient signatures on his petitions or is this an arbitrary decision by the executive committee?themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:The South Carolina Democratic Party's executive committee decided Thursday Colbert would not be included on the ballot.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."
- eyégor
- ???????
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:26 am
- Location: Trollsberg
If you meet the requirements given to you for inclusion in a primary, you should be able to run, regardless of why you choose to run.
To exclude Colbert puts the SC Democratic primary in a category usually only occupied by sham elections in totalitarian regimes. There is no difference between this barring of a candidate and one based on the likelihood of someone defeating the executive committee's preferred candidate.
sad
To exclude Colbert puts the SC Democratic primary in a category usually only occupied by sham elections in totalitarian regimes. There is no difference between this barring of a candidate and one based on the likelihood of someone defeating the executive committee's preferred candidate.
sad

- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27965
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: I won't be voting for Steven Colbert
Just like the NOTA vote, comedians who run to make a point (and get a huge outpouring of popular support in the process) are part of our political system, too. How dare the executive committee reject the voice of the people?earendel wrote:It was a decision by the executive committee. I'm of two minds about this - I think he should have the right to run if he meets the requisite requirements. But BTST he is doing it for the entertainment value, not because he has a realistic shot at winning, and in so doing is making a mockery of the electoral process (some might say it's too late for that).MarleysGh0st wrote:Did he not collect sufficient signatures on his petitions or is this an arbitrary decision by the executive committee?themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:

Especially if they'll leave Henry Hewes of New York, whoever the heck he is, on the ballot...
- earendel
- Posts: 13834
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
- Location: mired in the bureaucracy
Re: I won't be voting for Steven Colbert
According to his official Web site:MarleysGh0st wrote:Especially if they'll leave Henry Hewes of New York, whoever the heck he is, on the ballot...
http://www.henryhewes.com/about/index.htm
He was a Republican until 2004 when his strong opposition to the war in Iraq and to the degradation of civil rights that flowed from the war on terror made it impossible for him to remain a Republican. He supports a $10 minimum wage, universal health care, and is opposed to abortion.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."
- Appa23
- Posts: 3768
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm
I say three cheers for that executive committee!!!
Clearly, they are like me and really enjoy The Colbert Report, so they did not want him to have to quit the show.
He could not be a political candidate and have a national cable show.
(Meanwhile, we wonder who, if anyone, will challenge TNT showing re-runs of the Fred Thompson episodes of Law *& Order.)
Clearly, they are like me and really enjoy The Colbert Report, so they did not want him to have to quit the show.
He could not be a political candidate and have a national cable show.
(Meanwhile, we wonder who, if anyone, will challenge TNT showing re-runs of the Fred Thompson episodes of Law *& Order.)
- peacock2121
- Posts: 18451
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am
tee heeAppa23 wrote:I say three cheers for that executive committee!!!
Clearly, they are like me and really enjoy The Colbert Report, so they did not want him to have to quit the show.
He could not be a political candidate and have a national cable show.
(Meanwhile, we wonder who, if anyone, will challenge TNT showing re-runs of the Fred Thompson episodes of Law *& Order.)
clearly
- TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4884
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
- Contact:
- minimetoo26
- Royal Pain In Everyone's Ass
- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:51 am
- Location: No Fixed Address
What I read is that it costs the party 20 grand for every name on the ballot. It makes good fiscal sense to eliminate the less-than-viable ones.TheCalvinator24 wrote:Has the Ex Council issued a statement? If I had to guess, I would say they had valid grounds to exclude him because I seriously doubt that Colbert filed all the appropriate paperwork with the FEC.
As much as I love the guy, it was a joke, and you're nowhere near viable if you only run in one state, and pick your party affiliation based on how much they charge you to file.
Jokes over. Back to the day job....
- PlacentiaSoccerMom
- Posts: 8134
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
- Location: Placentia, CA
- Contact:
- earendel
- Posts: 13834
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
- Location: mired in the bureaucracy