Change You Can Believe In

[silverscreenselect]

From today's Wall Street Journal:

President-elect Barack Obama is unlikely to radically overhaul controversial Bush administration intelligence policies, advisers say, an approach that is almost certain to create tension within the Democratic Party.

Civil-liberties groups were among those outraged that the White House sanctioned the use of harsh intelligence techniques -- which some consider torture -- by the Central Intelligence Agency, and expanded domestic spy powers. These groups are demanding quick action to reverse these policies.

Former National Counterterrorism Center chief John Brennan, leader of Obama's intelligence-transition team.
Mr. Obama is being advised largely by a group of intelligence professionals, including some who have supported Republicans, and centrist former officials in the Clinton administration. They say he is likely to fill key intelligence posts with pragmatists.

"He's going to take a very centrist approach to these issues," said Roger Cressey, a former counterterrorism official in the Clinton and Bush administrations. "Whenever an administration swings too far on the spectrum left or right, we end up getting ourselves in big trouble."

On the campaign trail, Mr. Obama criticized many of President George W. Bush's counterterrorism policies. He condemned Mr. Bush for promoting "excessive secrecy, indefinite detention, warrantless wiretapping and 'enhanced interrogation techniques' like simulated drowning that qualify as torture through any careful measure of the law or appeal to human decency."

As a candidate, Mr. Obama said the CIA's interrogation program should adhere to the same rules that apply to the military, which would prohibit the use of techniques such as waterboarding. He has also said the program should be investigated.

Yet he more recently voted for a White House-backed law to expand eavesdropping powers for the National Security Agency. Mr. Obama said he opposed providing legal immunity to telecommunications companies that aided warrantless surveillance, but ultimately voted for the bill, which included an immunity provision.

The new president could take a similar approach to revising the rules for CIA interrogations, said one current government official familiar with the transition. Upon review, Mr. Obama may decide he wants to keep the road open in certain cases for the CIA to use techniques not approved by the military, but with much greater oversight.

Civil-liberties and human-rights advocates, who helped Mr. Obama win election, are seeking both a reversal of Bush administration policies and expanded investigations into possible illegal actions when the administration sought to track down terrorists after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Expect to see more of these articles in months to come as change proves harder and harder to find.... The bold section is not an offhand comment but another trial balloon that Obama likes to float to see just what type of adverse reaction these suggestions get.

[danielh41]

Expect to see more of these articles in months to come as change proves harder and harder to find.... The bold section is not an offhand comment but another trial balloon that Obama likes to float to see just what type of adverse reaction these suggestions get.

On the other hand, perhaps Obama was alarmed enough by the intelligence reports that he now has access to that he wants to keep certain intelligence policies in place.

[nitrah55]

Reading the Wall Street Journal to get an idea of what Obama's going to do is like reading the Racing Form to pick a movie.

[MarleysGh0st]

An unidentified (Republican) government official is speculating on what Obama might do?

Really, SSS, won't there be time to criticize after he's inaugurated and actually doing things you disapprove of?

Until then...




Give it a rest!

[gsabc]

I agree with Marley. This is the only "change we can believe in" reference I want to see for a while.

http://www.usmint.gov/mint_programs/lincolnRedesign/