



Vandal wrote:This is what Boston looks like right now:
@nickcafardo: Red Sox COO Sam Kennedy said no decision on tonight's Red Sox-Royals game "until we hear from city officials.


Despite the surviving brother having the name of the capital they never lived in Chechnya.Spock wrote:My 6 degrees of Separation.
Son of neighbor's-he is about my age and he worked for us growing up and stuff and we rent land from his folk's and we sometimes hunt together. Anyway, his daughter goes to Harvard(I do not know the daughter and did not know she went to Harvard). Anyway-her roommate lost both legs.
FWIW-when they showed the pics yesterday-I was thinking Chechens.
Not to make like of it at all, but they were redshirts.jarnon wrote:ABC News confirms that Dzhokhar is in custody.
In the last few days, law enforcement has solved their three biggest cases: the Texas prosecutor murders, the Ricin mailings, and the Boston Marathon bombing. It shows that when they apply all their resources, real-life cops can be as effective as the ones on TV.
Unfortunately, capturing these scumbags often comes at the cost of heroic police officers' lives. From J.D. Tippet (murdered by Lee Harvey Oswald) to Jeremiah MacKay (killed by Christopher Dorner) and Sean Collier (killed by the Tsarnaevs), and so many in between, they're prepared to sacrifice themselves to capture these assholes and protect the rest of us. They'll live forever in our grateful memories.
What ever would possess you to post something so patently and gratuitously offensive? I'm disgusted!Bob Juch wrote:Not to make like of it at all, but they were redshirts.
You have to ask?plasticene wrote:What ever would possess you to post something so patently and gratuitously offensive? I'm disgusted!Bob Juch wrote:Not to make like of it at all, but they were redshirts.
BackInTex wrote:You have to ask?plasticene wrote:What ever would possess you to post something so patently and gratuitously offensive? I'm disgusted!Bob Juch wrote:Not to make like of it at all, but they were redshirts.
Of course, I don't understand the reference, but given the source, I will trust you that it is offensive.

no one got to check if he had an explosive device in his rectum? really really high up?Vandal wrote:First shot of suspect as he was taken into custody:
Hey, somebody had to check if he was packing a suicide bomb.
Note: No red shirts to be found.
Huh? The capital of Chechnya is Grozny. The surviving brother is named Dzhokhar.Bob Juch wrote:Despite the surviving brother having the name of the capital they never lived in Chechnya.Spock wrote:My 6 degrees of Separation.
Son of neighbor's-he is about my age and he worked for us growing up and stuff and we rent land from his folk's and we sometimes hunt together. Anyway, his daughter goes to Harvard(I do not know the daughter and did not know she went to Harvard). Anyway-her roommate lost both legs.
FWIW-when they showed the pics yesterday-I was thinking Chechens.
TheConfessor wrote:Huh? The capital of Chechnya is Grozny. The surviving brother is named Dzhokhar.Bob Juch wrote:Despite the surviving brother having the name of the capital they never lived in Chechnya.Spock wrote:My 6 degrees of Separation.
Son of neighbor's-he is about my age and he worked for us growing up and stuff and we rent land from his folk's and we sometimes hunt together. Anyway, his daughter goes to Harvard(I do not know the daughter and did not know she went to Harvard). Anyway-her roommate lost both legs.
FWIW-when they showed the pics yesterday-I was thinking Chechens.
Wikipedia wrote:In Russian, "Grozny" means "fearsome", "awesome" or "redoubtable". During the existence of the separatist republic, the city was renamed Dzokhar-Ghala in 1996, and Chechen separatists sometimes continue to refer to the city as Dzhokhar or Djohar (Chechen: Джовхар-ГIала, Dƶovxar-Ġala); it was named so after Dzhokhar Dudaev, the first president of the separatist Chechen Republic of Ichkeria.
Yet another sad recent example of a well armed, well trained victim unable to defend himself against armed assailants who, as usually happens, have the element of surprise in a fatal confrontation. Yet the NRA continues to spin the yarn that the only thing we can do about this is to give ordinary law abiding citizens a rather illusory opportunity to arm oursevles as well as the Tsarnaev brothers so we'll have a sporting chance to outdraw and outshoot them. I'd rather we take more steps to deny them the firepower to engage in massive shootouts with police.ghostjmf wrote: Sean Collier was not sticking his neck out unnecessarily; he probably never knew what hit him & he actually was a real police officer; had been through the same training as real police & was 1st in line for the next position to open on the Somerville police roster. Says the mayor of Somerville.
I'll take the sporting chance, how small you may think it be, vs. no chance at all.silverscreenselect wrote:Yet another sad recent example of a well armed, well trained victim unable to defend himself against armed assailants who, as usually happens, have the element of surprise in a fatal confrontation. Yet the NRA continues to spin the yarn that the only thing we can do about this is to give ordinary law abiding citizens a rather illusory opportunity to arm oursevles as well as the Tsarnaev brothers so we'll have a sporting chance to outdraw and outshoot them. I'd rather we take more steps to deny them the firepower to engage in massive shootouts with police.
And by the way, the shootout didn't end with the cops outdrawing and outshooting the Tsarnaevs. It ended when the older brother ran out of ammunition and tried to surrender before the younger brother ran him over with the SUV.
And then there is this thing called the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution. It is part of a thing called the Bill of Rights. Our Rights. It kind of says that the Federal Government is specifically not allowed to infringe upon OUR rights to keep and bear arms. What they are trying to do seems an awful lot like infringing upon the right to keep and bear arms to me.BackInTex wrote:I'll take the sporting chance, how small you may think it be, vs. no chance at all.silverscreenselect wrote:Yet another sad recent example of a well armed, well trained victim unable to defend himself against armed assailants who, as usually happens, have the element of surprise in a fatal confrontation. Yet the NRA continues to spin the yarn that the only thing we can do about this is to give ordinary law abiding citizens a rather illusory opportunity to arm oursevles as well as the Tsarnaev brothers so we'll have a sporting chance to outdraw and outshoot them. I'd rather we take more steps to deny them the firepower to engage in massive shootouts with police.
And by the way, the shootout didn't end with the cops outdrawing and outshooting the Tsarnaevs. It ended when the older brother ran out of ammunition and tried to surrender before the younger brother ran him over with the SUV.
And the decision to draw on an unsuspecting individual includes the analysis of while I'm shooting this one who has only an illusory chance to outdraw me, I wonder how many of the others nearby who will have a very real advantage (should they be armed) of getting their sights on me before I can finish off Joe #1 and re-target.
In Boston, that decision is pretty easy. No chance of others getting the advantage on me. In Houston, not so much.
And no law on the book, proposed, or imagined by your small mind would have prevented these guys from getting guns.
I'm not sure how close Houston is to Kaufman County, but being armed in Texas didn't stop the DA from being shot 20 times.BackInTex wrote: In Boston, that decision is pretty easy. No chance of others getting the advantage on me. In Houston, not so much.
And no law on the book, proposed, or imagined by your small mind would have prevented these guys from getting guns.
Only if you enforce them. Ask Chicago how that is working out.silverscreenselect wrote:I'm not sure how close Houston is to Kaufman County, but being armed in Texas didn't stop the DA from being shot 20 times.BackInTex wrote: In Boston, that decision is pretty easy. No chance of others getting the advantage on me. In Houston, not so much.
And no law on the book, proposed, or imagined by your small mind would have prevented these guys from getting guns.
And by your logic, we shouldn't have any criminal laws because laws against murder didn't stop those guys from killing people. Gun control laws won't stop all criminals or would-be criminals from getting guns but it will stop some of them and make it easier to catch others.