Whoever coached Palin

Message

Beebs52 · #26 Post by **Beebs52** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:59 am

Bob Juch wrote:
Sir_Galahad wrote:
Bob Juch wrote: No, I hate snarky women.
Do you find them too intimidating?

Yes, I know... the truth hurts sometimes.
No, just irritating.

We're just hoping to pull a pearl from your inner sanctum.

silvercamaro · #27 Post by **silvercamaro** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:59 am

Bob Juch wrote: No, just irritating.

Not trying to be snarky here, just asking. How do you define snarky (men or women)? Is that anyone who disagrees with you?

Bob Juch · #28 Post by **Bob Juch** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:05 am

silvercamaro wrote:
Bob Juch wrote: No, just irritating.
Not trying to be snarky here, just asking. How do you define snarky (men or women)? Is that anyone who disagrees with you?

Someone who is sarcastic.

Timsterino · #29 Post by **Timsterino** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:17 am

Here I jump into the political fire....

I think how one views Palin's speech very much depends on our own political leaning. I make no excuses with the fact that I am a moderate Democrat.

I do want to say that I find talk of her inabiliy to lead because she is a mother or has small children to be absurd. I also find the sexual comments about her in relation to her being the VP nominee to be offensive. Although I do not agree with McCain or Palin on most issues, I am thrilled that McCain made a balsey choice in his VP. I think they are a strong combo.

With that said, I found her speech last night to be incredibly boring and uninspiring. But then again, like I said previously, I think views will vary based on your own political beliefs.

Bob Juch · #30 Post by **Bob Juch** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:21 am

Beebs52 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
Sir_Galahad wrote: Do you find them too intimidating?

Yes, I know... the truth hurts sometimes.
No, just irritating.
We're just hoping to pull a pearl from your inner sanctum.

I don't put pearls in my inner sanctum. I know that turns some people on but....

NellyLunatic1980 · #31 Post by **NellyLunatic1980** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:23 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
NellyLunatic1980 wrote: As opposed to somebody who is comfortable with, say, snarky phonies who flip-flop on every one of their core principles and have the brass ones to continue to call themselves "a maverick" and "an independent"?
You have me on one point there. Obama can't flip-flop on any of his core principles. He has no core principles other than the advancement of Obama, and I highly doubt he's ever going to flip-flop on that one.

Your political comments make me laugh every time. I think I'm gonna start referring to you as a comedian--the same way that Olbermann refers to Rush Limbaugh as a comedian.

silvercamaro · #32 Post by **silvercamaro** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:25 am

Bob Juch wrote:
I don't put pearls in my inner sanctum. I know that turns some people on but....

Oh, no! That sounded snarkily sarcastic.

earendel · #33 Post by **earendel** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:37 am

If I may interject a comment, I find the level of snarkitude among our female BBs to be just the right amount.

Beebs52 · #34 Post by **Beebs52** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:43 am

earendel wrote:If I may interject a comment, I find the level of snarkitude among our female BBs to be just the right amount.

You're a gentleman of exquisite taste.

Bob Juch · #35 Post by **Bob Juch** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:48 am

earendel wrote:If I may interject a comment, I find the level of snarkitude among our female BBs to be just the right amount.

Kiss ass!

Tocqueville3 · #36 Post by **Tocqueville3** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:49 am

Beebs52 wrote:
earendel wrote:If I may interject a comment, I find the level of snarkitude among our female BBs to be just the right amount.
You're a gentleman of exquisite taste.

Agreed. Although I disagree with him politically, I find ear to be a gentleman.

Unlike that asshole, BobJuch.

Snarky enough for ya?

peacock2121 · #37 Post by **peacock2121** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:49 am

Bob Juch wrote:
earendel wrote:If I may interject a comment, I find the level of snarkitude among our female BBs to be just the right amount.
Kiss ass!

LOL

snarkass

Beebs52 · #38 Post by **Beebs52** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:50 am

Bob Juch wrote:
Beebs52 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote: No, just irritating.
We're just hoping to pull a pearl from your inner sanctum.
I don't put pearls in my inner sanctum. I know that turns some people on but....

Of course you know that pearls aren't "put." They're created by irritation. Considering how many snarkessess you have to deal with on the bored I'd say you're sporting an opera length strand.

Bob Juch · #39 Post by **Bob Juch** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:54 am

Beebs52 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
Beebs52 wrote: We're just hoping to pull a pearl from your inner sanctum.
I don't put pearls in my inner sanctum. I know that turns some people on but....
Of course you know that pearls aren't "put." They're created by irritation. Considering how many snarkessess you have to deal with on the bored I'd say you're sporting an opera length strand.

I hate to destroy your innocence, but:
http://www.wickedtickles.co.uk/onlinesh ... r-744.html

Tocqueville3 · #40 Post by **Tocqueville3** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:56 am

Bob Juch wrote:
Beebs52 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote: I don't put pearls in my inner sanctum. I know that turns some people on but....
Of course you know that pearls aren't "put." They're created by irritation. Considering how many snarkessess you have to deal with on the bored I'd say you're sporting an opera length strand.
I hate to destroy your innocence, but:
http://www.wickedtickles.co.uk/onlinesh ... r-744.html

Dang! You found that site really fast. Was it bookmarked?

earendel · #41 Post by **earendel** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:03 pm

Bob Juch wrote:
earendel wrote:If I may interject a comment, I find the level of snarkitude among our female BBs to be just the right amount.
Kiss ass!

Women live longer and have more money. I know which side of my bread the butter is on.

Appa23 · #42 Post by **Appa23** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:14 pm

NellyLunatic1980 wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:
NellyLunatic1980 wrote: As opposed to somebody who is comfortable with, say, snarky phonies who flip-flop on every one of their core principles and have the brass ones to continue to call themselves "a maverick" and "an independent"?
You have me on one point there. Obama can't flip-flop on any of his core principles. He has no core principles other than the advancement of Obama, and I highly doubt he's ever going to flip-flop on that one.
Your political comments make me laugh every time. I think I'm gonna start referring to you as a comedian--the same way that Olbermann refers to Rush Limbaugh as a comedian.

I think that you should use his full name:

Keith "I'm running away to Europe to get that surgery so I can return and bear Barack's love child" Olbermann.

Beebs52 · #43 Post by **Beebs52** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:29 pm

Bob Juch wrote:
Beebs52 wrote:
Bob Juch wrote: I don't put pearls in my inner sanctum. I know that turns some people on but....
Of course you know that pearls aren't "put." They're created by irritation. Considering how many snarkessess you have to deal with on the bored I'd say you're sporting an opera length strand.
I hate to destroy your innocence, but:
http://www.wickedtickles.co.uk/onlinesh ... r-744.html

Class act there.