Christmas conundrum
- Greyhound Dude
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:24 pm
- Location: Greyhound track near you
- andrewjackson
- Posts: 3945
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
- Location: Planet 10
- BackInTex
- Posts: 13493
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: In Texas of course!
I'll never understand this dog math! I thought you divided by 7.Greyhound Dude wrote: the distance is 61.61 ft. which is approximately 20.53 ft.

..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
~~ Thomas Jefferson
War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)
- Greyhound Dude
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:24 pm
- Location: Greyhound track near you
- andrewjackson
- Posts: 3945
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
- Location: Planet 10
I'm not questioning the math or that there is a possible arrangement that will result in a RB distance of 21 yards. My issue is that it looks to me like there are four possible arrangements of the trees that results in four different distances for RB. Here is one example. It is possible to draw the arrangement of trees like this. Ignore the dots since they are there only to correctly place the letters.Greyhound Dude wrote:For those of you who wonder how I got an "exact" answer, I am a computer drafting and design technician and have CAD software that allows me to lay out points based on distances from known objects.
Pretty simple.
So much for doggie math and multiplying by 7.
So there!!!!!!!!
.......................................O
......................................................R
..........................Y................................P
.............B
The OR distance is slightly shorter than OP (10 to 11) and YR is slightly shorter than YR (12 to 13) so R can wind up inside the triangle OYP but very close to P. Since OB is much longer than OY and PB is much longer than PY it winds up down in the lower left. However R is slightly closer to B than P so RB must be around 16 yds. Ignore the dots since they are there only to correctly place the letters. I've drawn this out and done the math and I get 16.4 yards for RB.
Last edited by andrewjackson on Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
No matter where you go, there you are.
- andrewjackson
- Posts: 3945
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
- Location: Planet 10
Or you can put the Blue tree up to upper right and get the same distance RB.
...................................................................................B
.......................................O
......................................................R
..........................Y................................P
But once again RB must be similar to the length of PB. There is no way it can be 21 yards.
...................................................................................B
.......................................O
......................................................R
..........................Y................................P
But once again RB must be similar to the length of PB. There is no way it can be 21 yards.
No matter where you go, there you are.
- Greyhound Dude
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:24 pm
- Location: Greyhound track near you
Basically, it's all about intersecting circles at different radii. You need to be drawing circles, not straight lines (if I'm understanding your diagram properly). If you have two objects at a certain distance, think of one object being the center of the circle and the other object being along the circumference of said circle with whatever radius you want. With only (2) objects, there are infinite possibilities (placement of the second object along the circumference). When you start adding other objects based on those original two objects, you narrow down the possible intersection points of the circumferences of the circles.
- andrewjackson
- Posts: 3945
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:33 pm
- Location: Planet 10
I understand all that and that's how I did it.Greyhound Dude wrote:Basically, it's all about intersecting circles at different radii. You need to be drawing circles, not straight lines (if I'm understanding your diagram properly). If you have two objects at a certain distance, think of one object being the center of the circle and the other object being along the circumference of said circle with whatever radius you want. With only (2) objects, there are infinite possibilities (placement of the second object along the circumference). When you start adding other objects based on those original two objects, you narrow down the possible intersection points of the circumferences of the circles.
I just seems to me like you can get different distances based on different arrangements of the trees that still respect the originally specified distances.
In the example that I tried to illustrate above I don't see how RB can be that much greater than PB.
But maybe not. Maybe I'm making some kind of fundamental mistake that I'm just not seeing.
No matter where you go, there you are.