Darn Those Taxes, Darn Them I Say
- wintergreen48
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 1:42 pm
- Location: Resting comfortably in my comfy chair
Darn Those Taxes, Darn Them I Say
Well, I just did my taxes, and I am not pleased. Despite (supposedly) reform in the Alternative Minimum Tax, I still got hit with over $8,000 in AMT, which is over and above the 'real' tax that I have to pay. Jeez. And that is despite the fact that I live in a relatively low-tax state, and don't have a mortgage (and thus, no interest deduction), the two items that usually trigger high AMT liability. The trigger for AMT, in my case, is that DESPITE not having mortgage interest and DESPITE not having high state taxes, my deductions are 'excessive' nonetheless: that's what I get for paying God's Share (the 10% that I give to church and other good causes). I bet the ACLU is behind this. Or maybe it is because of my snooty accent. Dang.
On the other hand, it could have been a lot worse. When I started the program (Turbo Tax), it downloaded a lot of my information and the first screen showed that I have over $34,000 in taxes DUE. Last year, I reduced my withholding exemptions to -0- figuring that this would cut my end-of-the-year tax liability, and I couldn't figure out why I still owed so much. Not to mention, I couldn't figure out how in the world I was going to pay $34,000+. After I cleaned the vomit and stomach acids off the keyboard, I saw that the TurboTax automatic download did not include my deductions, nor did it include estimated tax amounts that I paid during the year, and when all that was done, it turns out that I owe just a bit over $1,000: still more than I would like, but a LOT less than (barf) $34,000.
Which brings to mind another reason for me to be grateful to Capital One for firing me (although the Severance Letter does not say that I was 'fired,' it says that they 'terminated the work cluster and all associated personnel'). How kind of them, to do what they can to cut my tax liability...
Oh, and speaking of Capital One, I actually had a very nice warm and fuzzy that I want to share. I got an e-mail from someone who still has a job there, and she wrote to tell me about something that had happened that I actually had not thought about for awhile. A few years ago, one of the Administrative Assistants at Capital One completed a Certified Paralegal program, finishing at the top of her class, and wanted to go for a Paralegal position at Capital One (these pay pretty well, several times-- multiples-- of what the AA jobs pay). She checked in with HR, which told her (per policy) that she could not post for the position without obtaining several years' worth of outside experience, which she could only obtain if she were to leave Capital One entirely and then reapply, years afterward. For someone who already had 12 years in at that place (including time with the predecessor bank from which Capital One spun off), this was distressing. ANYway, her then manager (who is the one who sent me the e-mail today), came to me for some advice, and, well, I found a way around the problem (what HR told her was true and was a fixed policy; I spit on fixed policies). I suggested a few things that could be done to get around the problem, and she did them, and she got what she wanted (and a ton more money). And she is today one of my biggest fans. After my departure from the company this month, she told a lot of people about this incident, and her (former) manager e-mailed me to let me know. It is nice to be remembered by people in a positive way.
But I'm still ticked about the tax thing.
On the other hand, it could have been a lot worse. When I started the program (Turbo Tax), it downloaded a lot of my information and the first screen showed that I have over $34,000 in taxes DUE. Last year, I reduced my withholding exemptions to -0- figuring that this would cut my end-of-the-year tax liability, and I couldn't figure out why I still owed so much. Not to mention, I couldn't figure out how in the world I was going to pay $34,000+. After I cleaned the vomit and stomach acids off the keyboard, I saw that the TurboTax automatic download did not include my deductions, nor did it include estimated tax amounts that I paid during the year, and when all that was done, it turns out that I owe just a bit over $1,000: still more than I would like, but a LOT less than (barf) $34,000.
Which brings to mind another reason for me to be grateful to Capital One for firing me (although the Severance Letter does not say that I was 'fired,' it says that they 'terminated the work cluster and all associated personnel'). How kind of them, to do what they can to cut my tax liability...
Oh, and speaking of Capital One, I actually had a very nice warm and fuzzy that I want to share. I got an e-mail from someone who still has a job there, and she wrote to tell me about something that had happened that I actually had not thought about for awhile. A few years ago, one of the Administrative Assistants at Capital One completed a Certified Paralegal program, finishing at the top of her class, and wanted to go for a Paralegal position at Capital One (these pay pretty well, several times-- multiples-- of what the AA jobs pay). She checked in with HR, which told her (per policy) that she could not post for the position without obtaining several years' worth of outside experience, which she could only obtain if she were to leave Capital One entirely and then reapply, years afterward. For someone who already had 12 years in at that place (including time with the predecessor bank from which Capital One spun off), this was distressing. ANYway, her then manager (who is the one who sent me the e-mail today), came to me for some advice, and, well, I found a way around the problem (what HR told her was true and was a fixed policy; I spit on fixed policies). I suggested a few things that could be done to get around the problem, and she did them, and she got what she wanted (and a ton more money). And she is today one of my biggest fans. After my departure from the company this month, she told a lot of people about this incident, and her (former) manager e-mailed me to let me know. It is nice to be remembered by people in a positive way.
But I'm still ticked about the tax thing.
- kayrharris
- Miss Congeniality
- Posts: 11968
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:48 am
- Location: Auburn, AL
- Contact:
All I know about taxes is the form I fill out for the accountant and the accompanying paperwork to go with it. I do feel your pain, as I'm sure a check will be in the mail from my household on April 15.
Congrats on the good advice and the ensuing success story. They knew who to call to get the job done right!
Congrats on the good advice and the ensuing success story. They knew who to call to get the job done right!
"An investment in knowledge pays the best interest. "
Benjamin Franklin
Benjamin Franklin
- TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4884
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
- Contact:
- Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 16192
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: Darn Those Taxes, Darn Them I Say
I feel for/with you about the tax thing, but you absolutely ROCK with the admin thing. I'm thinking you have a consultancy position via word of mouth that may be your true calling. What screwed up policies. And I thought I worked in the Mad Hatter's world. Not necessarily my company, but associated entities who are spawning Tweedledums and Dees as we speak.wintergreen48 wrote:to tell me about something that had happened that I actually had not thought about for awhile. A few years ago, one of the Administrative Assistants at Capital One completed a Certified Paralegal program, finishing at the top of her class, and wanted to go for a Paralegal position at Capital One (these pay pretty well, several times-- multiples-- of what the AA jobs pay). She checked in with HR, which told her (per policy) that she could not post for the position without obtaining several years' worth of outside experience, which she could only obtain if she were to leave Capital One entirely and then reapply, years afterward. For someone who already had 12 years in at that place (including time with the predecessor bank from which Capital One spun off), this was distressing. ANYway, her then manager (who is the one who sent me the e-mail today), came to me for some advice, and, well, I found a way around the problem (what HR told her was true and was a fixed policy; I spit on fixed policies). I suggested a few things that could be done to get around the problem, and she did them, and she got what she wanted (and a ton more money). And she is today one of my biggest fans. After my departure from the company this month, she told a lot of people about this incident, and her (former) manager e-mailed me to let me know. It is nice to be remembered by people in a positive way.
But I'm still ticked about the tax thing.
Well, then
- themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7631
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: Darn Those Taxes, Darn Them I Say
both of these would make good signature lineswintergreen48 wrote: I spit on fixed policies
But I'm still ticked about the tax thing.
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27965
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
I'm getting some money back from the feds, but I had to write another check to New York. Because my state taxes aren't deductible on my state return, I can't do better than the standard deduction, so all my charitable contributions count for nothing, as far as Albany is concerned.
And I recently got my new real estate assessment. The value of my house went up modestly, but they also boosted the assessments to be based on 100% of market value, from the previous 85% level. Oddly, I don't remember any headlines about the county legislature passing this 18% tax increase.

And I recently got my new real estate assessment. The value of my house went up modestly, but they also boosted the assessments to be based on 100% of market value, from the previous 85% level. Oddly, I don't remember any headlines about the county legislature passing this 18% tax increase.

- PlacentiaSoccerMom
- Posts: 8134
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
- Location: Placentia, CA
- Contact:
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 27033
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Because of the AMT, my $50,000 BAM winnins netted me a little less than $20,000.PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:I hate AMT taxes.
Maddie had to pay them on her Jeopardy winnings because she was under the age of 14 and Jeff and I have been paying them for seven years.
I can't imagine the government fixing the issue because it is the source of so much revenue for them.

I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Appa23
- Posts: 3768
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:04 pm
I can see that the AMT cost you at least one G.Bob Juch wrote:Because of the AMT, my $50,000 BAM winnins netted me a little less than $20,000.PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:I hate AMT taxes.
Maddie had to pay them on her Jeopardy winnings because she was under the age of 14 and Jeff and I have been paying them for seven years.
I can't imagine the government fixing the issue because it is the source of so much revenue for them.

- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22002
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
That's rather hard for me to believe. I live in California, a state with a 9.3% marginal tax rate, and I've been subject to AMT for a number of years. Worse, I'm in the phase-out zone where my AMT exemption is evaporating, so each additional $100 of income increases my AMT tax base by $125. With all of that in place, my total marginal tax rate is still significantly south of 50%. --BobBob Juch wrote:Because of the AMT, my $50,000 BAM winnins netted me a little less than $20,000.
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 27033
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Bob, that increased the tax on my other income so the next effect was just a $20,000 gain.Bob78164 wrote:That's rather hard for me to believe. I live in California, a state with a 9.3% marginal tax rate, and I've been subject to AMT for a number of years. Worse, I'm in the phase-out zone where my AMT exemption is evaporating, so each additional $100 of income increases my AMT tax base by $125. With all of that in place, my total marginal tax rate is still significantly south of 50%. --BobBob Juch wrote:Because of the AMT, my $50,000 BAM winnins netted me a little less than $20,000.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- peacock2121
- Posts: 18451
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22002
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
That's why I referred to the <I>marginal</I> rate, not the nominal rate. My nominal rate (between state and federal) is 35.3%, but my marginal rate is north of 40%. --BobBob Juch wrote:Bob, that increased the tax on my other income so the next effect was just a $20,000 gain.Bob78164 wrote:That's rather hard for me to believe. I live in California, a state with a 9.3% marginal tax rate, and I've been subject to AMT for a number of years. Worse, I'm in the phase-out zone where my AMT exemption is evaporating, so each additional $100 of income increases my AMT tax base by $125. With all of that in place, my total marginal tax rate is still significantly south of 50%. --BobBob Juch wrote:Because of the AMT, my $50,000 BAM winnins netted me a little less than $20,000.
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- ToLiveIsToFly
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:34 am
- Location: Kalamazoo
- Contact:
We can't file our taxes until Frankie gets a SSN. Who knows when that will be.
We were all psyched to have the kid before the new year for the exemption. But it turns out our mortgage interest, taxes and charity add up to more than the standard (I wouldn't have thought so), so we get no tax break from the kid.
And our hospital stay ended up in two calendar years. BCBS sounds like they're not going to apply the max out-of-pocket for both years, but they haven't committed to it yet.
We were all psyched to have the kid before the new year for the exemption. But it turns out our mortgage interest, taxes and charity add up to more than the standard (I wouldn't have thought so), so we get no tax break from the kid.
And our hospital stay ended up in two calendar years. BCBS sounds like they're not going to apply the max out-of-pocket for both years, but they haven't committed to it yet.
- ToLiveIsToFly
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:34 am
- Location: Kalamazoo
- Contact:
I mean, we're still psyched he came before the new year. I don't think Margy would have stayed sane if she had to wait another 60 hours.ToLiveIsToFly wrote:We can't file our taxes until Frankie gets a SSN. Who knows when that will be.
We were all psyched to have the kid before the new year for the exemption. But it turns out our mortgage interest, taxes and charity add up to more than the standard (I wouldn't have thought so), so we get no tax break from the kid.
And our hospital stay ended up in two calendar years. BCBS sounds like they're not going to apply the max out-of-pocket for both years, but they haven't committed to it yet.
- TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4884
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
- Contact:
I'm not sure how the birth could not have positive tax consequences. You get an additional Exemption, and a Child Tax Credit.ToLiveIsToFly wrote:We can't file our taxes until Frankie gets a SSN. Who knows when that will be.
We were all psyched to have the kid before the new year for the exemption. But it turns out our mortgage interest, taxes and charity add up to more than the standard (I wouldn't have thought so), so we get no tax break from the kid.
And our hospital stay ended up in two calendar years. BCBS sounds like they're not going to apply the max out-of-pocket for both years, but they haven't committed to it yet.
The Standard Deduction really has nothing to do with it.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
-
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:10 pm
I agree with Bob about this. A 60% marginal tax rate on your winnings simply isn't a possibly.Bob Juch wrote:Bob, that increased the tax on my other income so the next effect was just a $20,000 gain.Bob78164 wrote:That's rather hard for me to believe. I live in California, a state with a 9.3% marginal tax rate, and I've been subject to AMT for a number of years. Worse, I'm in the phase-out zone where my AMT exemption is evaporating, so each additional $100 of income increases my AMT tax base by $125. With all of that in place, my total marginal tax rate is still significantly south of 50%. --BobBob Juch wrote:Because of the AMT, my $50,000 BAM winnins netted me a little less than $20,000.
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 27033
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
Let me type this slowly: The increase in income from BAM's $50,000 put me in the maximum rates for both NY and Federal taxes. That caused a huge increase in the taxes on my regular employment income. I did not say my total income was taxed at 60%.slam wrote:I agree with Bob about this. A 60% marginal tax rate on your winnings simply isn't a possibly.Bob Juch wrote:Bob, that increased the tax on my other income so the next effect was just a $20,000 gain.Bob78164 wrote:That's rather hard for me to believe. I live in California, a state with a 9.3% marginal tax rate, and I've been subject to AMT for a number of years. Worse, I'm in the phase-out zone where my AMT exemption is evaporating, so each additional $100 of income increases my AMT tax base by $125. With all of that in place, my total marginal tax rate is still significantly south of 50%. --Bob
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- dodgersteve182
- Posts: 543
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:41 pm
- Bob78164
- Bored Moderator
- Posts: 22002
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
- Location: By the phone
I'll type equally slowly. No, it didn't.Bob Juch wrote:Let me type this slowly: The increase in income from BAM's $50,000 put me in the maximum rates for both NY and Federal taxes. That caused a huge increase in the taxes on my regular employment income.
You appear to have made a common error, one that frequently requires correcting on a tax board that I frequent. The maximum rates don't "reach back" to sweep in earlier income. So if on a $70,000 income your tax rate was, say, 20%, and if adding $50,000 to that income puts you in, say, the 28% bracket, you do not reach back and apply the 28% rate to the first $70,000. Instead, you continue to apply the lower rate until the lower bracket fills up. The higher rate is applied only to the income that's above the cutoff for the lower bracket.
It is possible for the extra income to affect taxation of "earlier" income, but that occurs by phasing out deductions and/or exemptions that formerly shielded some of that income from taxation. When you work the math (and I have), you'll find that it's simply not possible to come close to a 60% marginal rate. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson
- MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27965
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
The Bobs are having a knock-down, drag-out over the tax code.Bob78164 wrote:I'll type equally slowly. No, it didn't.Bob Juch wrote:Let me type this slowly: The increase in income from BAM's $50,000 put me in the maximum rates for both NY and Federal taxes. That caused a huge increase in the taxes on my regular employment income.
Good entertainment for a Friday afternoon!

- TheConfessor
- Posts: 6462
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm
- Rexer25
- It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
- Posts: 2899
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: Just this side of nowhere
- christie1111
- 11:11
- Posts: 11630
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:54 am
- Location: CT
- peacock2121
- Posts: 18451
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am
This just cracked me up.Bob Juch wrote:Let me type this slowly: The increase in income from BAM's $50,000 put me in the maximum rates for both NY and Federal taxes. That caused a huge increase in the taxes on my regular employment income. I did not say my total income was taxed at 60%.slam wrote:I agree with Bob about this. A 60% marginal tax rate on your winnings simply isn't a possibly.Bob Juch wrote: Bob, that increased the tax on my other income so the next effect was just a $20,000 gain.
Let me type this slowly!!!!!!
Cracked me up.